When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I actually have a little aero experience and it still screwed with me for a while!!
It messes with most people (me included). I first had this brain teaser way back in college physics 100. But the point of the problem wasn't to teach us physics, it was meant to teach us the difference between common sense and sense, as our Professor put it. Common sense being what we believe will happen based on our own life experience. And sense being what well established and tested Physical Laws tell us is going to happen. And that often times common sense can be waaaaaaaay off!
It messes with most people (me included). I first had this brain teaser way back in college physics 100. But the point of the problem wasn't to teach us physics, it was meant to teach us the difference between common sense and sense, as our Professor put it. Common sense being what we believe will happen based on our own life experience. And sense being what well established and tested Physical Laws tell us is going to happen. And that often times common sense can be waaaaaaaay off!
What you, and a few others, are not accepting (neither was I) is that the plane absolutely is moving forward and creating airspeed....the moving runway has nothing to do with impeding forward progress.
If the plane is moving forward, then, technically, you have no problem to answer. It doesn't matter if the wheels turn or not. The plane could be on skids as far as I'm concerned (ever seen a pilot on the catapult of a carrier forget to unlock his brakes? The plane still takes off, it just has to land with 2 blown tires). If the plane is moving forward with the conveyor belt, it is being provided forward momentum, causing airflow across the flight surfaces, which, in turn, creates lift.
Physics dictates it will take off and the only effect will be the wheels will spin faster.
Imagine you're on a tricyle on a treadmill and someone is pulling you forward with a rope (ie, thrust). You move forward despite there being a treadmill. The only difference between being pulled forward on unmoving ground and on a treadmill is the wheels will move slightly faster. While this creates some drag, it's an incredibly small amount in comparison to the thrust applied.
Likewsie, a plane is creating thrust against the momentum of the earth, not against the treadmill. The treadmill's only effect will be an increase in wheel speed.
The engines pull or push the plane foreward. Depending on prop or jet.
The wheels are freeturning, this allows the thrust from the engine or prop to move the plane to attain foreward speed.
If the belt turns and matches the speed of the wheels there will be no airflow above and below the wings to create lift. It will not move.
No it will not take off.
Yeah I used to work on airplanes but we never tried this.
This was debated once before, and led to a heated discussion.
The plane flies, even though most people think it won't. Mainly because people think of a plane as a car where the wheels apply power to the ground. A plane does not work that way - the power is applied to the air around it via the jet engines. Thus the speed and direction of the wheels are irrelevant to the problem.
Edit: think of the forces involved. The engines are at full throttle, so they will apply force to the plane in the forward direction. In order for the plane not to fly, there would have to be an equal force in the opposite direction. Where does this force come from?
The engines pull or push the plane foreward. Depending on prop or jet.
The wheels are freeturning, this allows the thrust from the engine or prop to move the plane to attain foreward speed.
If the belt turns and matches the speed of the wheels there will be no airflow above and below the wings to create lift. It will not move.
No it will not take off.
Yeah I used to work on airplanes but we never tried this.
Man, That's EXACTLY how I explained it.........when I was wrong
I can see this one comeing from a mile away.
When I was in the AF I flew in C-130,s.
We would takeoff from dirt runways on many occasions and they were what we called Assault Takeoffs.
The brakes would be locked and power applied to the engines untill the wheels started to drag in the dirt, then the brakes were released and we got jerked back and picked up foreward speed.
I have ran the engines to take off power on a cement ramp with the brakes locked and chocks in place and the plane didn't move.
C-130,s use skids or snow skees in Alaska in the winter.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.