Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Is CP4 still a problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2022 | 11:41 AM
  #121  
acdii's Avatar
acdii
Lead Driver
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 7,996
Likes: 4,063
Originally Posted by Overkill2
Yep have looked at Schaeffer's before... Never used it but believe it to be a premium oil for sure. One of my friends in the Club sent me a link about Triax. When I get a chance and find it, I'll PM you.

Just had an "issue" recently... I just got done fueling up, started the truck back up and immediately got a "Low Oil Pressure" warning... my heart dropped...I drove to the closet auto parts store, not far away, shut her off. I checked the oil and it was low on the stick but definitely on the stick at the lower notch. I bought a gallon of oil T4 10w30 and put in a quart. That put it halfway in the cross hatched area. I'm kind of pissed because I was going to have the oil analyzed and may still on this upcoming oil change... The warning still came back on but was relieved it wasn't because the oil was way low.

I looked online and found this is a common problem with the 6.7 Powerstroke. I bought a new oil pressure sensor switch but haven't put it in yet. It went on and off for a few days but is now off. I bought the Carquest one that has the lifetime warranty... I was going to go with the Motorcraft one but decided on the lifetime warranty instead. I'm now convinced that it was an electrical gremlin (the sensor itself) and not the lower oil level as that's not low enough in opinion to bring on the sensor... especially since it still came on after the quart was added and was very intermittent also.
I have a similar issue on my 20 year old Kubota. Normally the dash lights up when I first turn the key on for the oil pressure, but lately it is off until I crank it over then it flickers, comes on just as the engine starts and then turns off. Thinking it is time to replace the sending unit. It will be getting a complete fluid and filter change out this spring, so will tackle the OPSU at the same time.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2022 | 03:43 PM
  #122  
High_HP's Avatar
High_HP
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Likes: 179
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
I used Mobil Delvac in my 6.0PSD for almost 200k miles and it was an excellent oil for the 6.0PSD. Was a bit disappointed when Mobil and Chevron decided to reduce Zinc/Phosphorous to gas engine specifications in their diesel oil API CK4 spec, which made absolutely zero sense, but looks like they may have increased it now to get in align with the Ford Zinc/Phosphorous requirements.
I believe you are referring to the Delvac 1300. I used that oil exclusively until Mobil decided it would be dual spec oil (car + diesel) and removed anti-wear additives. The 15w-40 Extreme is full synthetic and has over 1,100 ppm of additives across the board, no sacrifices made on that oil thankfully.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2022 | 05:16 PM
  #123  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 2,681
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by High_HP
I believe you are referring to the Delvac 1300. I used that oil exclusively until Mobil decided it would be dual spec oil (car + diesel) and removed anti-wear additives. The 15w-40 Extreme is full synthetic and has over 1,100 ppm of additives across the board, no sacrifices made on that oil thankfully.
Yes the Delvac 1300
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2022 | 09:57 AM
  #124  
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
FTE Legend
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,979
Likes: 9,200
From: Western NY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by acdii
I have a similar issue on my 20 year old Kubota. Normally the dash lights up when I first turn the key on for the oil pressure, but lately it is off until I crank it over then it flickers, comes on just as the engine starts and then turns off. Thinking it is time to replace the sending unit. It will be getting a complete fluid and filter change out this spring, so will tackle the OPSU at the same time.
That was prior to the storm coming and I didn't feel like effing with it.. I'll keep an eye on it. As long as I know she's full of oil, NOT 13 gallons , I'm good.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2022 | 11:21 PM
  #125  
jollyrogr's Avatar
jollyrogr
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 949
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
Good to see you guys are catching on to Triax...

Also a bit of caution with Schaeffer's that it would produce high lead content in UOA's for the 7.3 PSD and the 6.0 PSD years ago. Obviously, that was with the API CI4+ oils but never did trust that brand since.
Schaeffer's is family owned and operated since 1839. My family has used their oils for many years with good success. My oil analysis results were always good and allowed for extended OCI's. I thought Triax seemed like a good product with some good reviews and very reasonably priced. My oil analysis with it was not bad, but you will definitely get nowhere near the OCI that Triax claims. Anyway my experiment with it is over and my next change will be with Schaeffers 5w-40. I still have some inventory of Triax to use up in my gas vehicles.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 09:21 AM
  #126  
carl2591's Avatar
carl2591
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 87
From: North Carolina, Raleigh
I suppose the disaster kits can work,, but from the many post i have seen some state otherwise.. And having a 7.3L 2003 with some now 230K miles on the OEM pump I can tell you the difference between a CP4 failure and a HPOP failure are like 10K apart.. When a 7.3 pump goes it just stops running most of the time.. NO "**** the pants" type deal with injectors replace, lines, pump , and drop fuel tank to clean a 10-14K problem.

Ram ONLY used the CP4 for 2 yrs (2019 -2020) ,, GM dropped them after only 5 yrs, (2011 to 2016) but Ford continues to use them to the demise of many a owner. Yes many do go miles with no issues for sure. but when you see most of the issues on complaints sites is death wobble and fuel pump issues it kinda make sense it the biggest issues for many owners.

Not mention the lawsuits, ongoing lawsuits against Ford and GM about the fuel pumps,, Hell Ram is currently in a middle of a nationwide recall to replace the CP4 pumps with a CP3 hybrid no less.. Something ford and GM did do.

Would i love to buy a ford diesel,, right now NO.. especially with the cost of diesel vs gas the 7.3L is running to the front.. and NO to the CP4 pump..





Originally Posted by brokestroke
Disaster prevention kit is $450, if the pump actually fails it cosots ~$1000 to replace. Whether or not it fails is TBD. $1450 to replace the pump (including the DPK cost) if you can do the work yourself, even cheaper. Not much different than owning a 7.3 that has an hpop failure.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 09:30 AM
  #127  
brokestroke's Avatar
brokestroke
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 993
Originally Posted by carl2591
I suppose the disaster kits can work,, but from the many post i have seen some state otherwise.. And having a 7.3L 2003 with some now 230K miles on the OEM pump I can tell you the difference between a CP4 failure and a HPOP failure are like 10K apart.. When a 7.3 pump goes it just stops running most of the time.. NO "**** the pants" type deal with injectors replace, lines, pump , and drop fuel tank to clean a 10-14K problem.

Ram ONLY used the CP4 for 2 yrs (2019 -2020) ,, GM dropped them after only 5 yrs, (2011 to 2016) but Ford continues to use them to the demise of many a owner. Yes many do go miles with no issues for sure. but when you see most of the issues on complaints sites is death wobble and fuel pump issues it kinda make sense it the biggest issues for many owners.

Not mention the lawsuits, ongoing lawsuits against Ford and GM about the fuel pumps,, Hell Ram is currently in a middle of a nationwide recall to replace the CP4 pumps with a CP3 hybrid no less.. Something ford and GM did do.

Would i love to buy a ford diesel,, right now NO.. especially with the cost of diesel vs gas the 7.3L is running to the front.. and NO to the CP4 pump..
Watch a couple of the S&S videos if you don't believe it works. The way it is designed there is no possible way for the injectors to get contaminated. It physically can't, the path the fuel travels is completely blocked off.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 09:56 AM
  #128  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 2,681
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by carl2591
I suppose the disaster kits can work,, but from the many post i have seen some state otherwise.. And having a 7.3L 2003 with some now 230K miles on the OEM pump I can tell you the difference between a CP4 failure and a HPOP failure are like 10K apart.. When a 7.3 pump goes it just stops running most of the time.. NO "**** the pants" type deal with injectors replace, lines, pump , and drop fuel tank to clean a 10-14K problem.

Ram ONLY used the CP4 for 2 yrs (2019 -2020) ,, GM dropped them after only 5 yrs, (2011 to 2016) but Ford continues to use them to the demise of many a owner. Yes many do go miles with no issues for sure. but when you see most of the issues on complaints sites is death wobble and fuel pump issues it kinda make sense it the biggest issues for many owners.

Not mention the lawsuits, ongoing lawsuits against Ford and GM about the fuel pumps,, Hell Ram is currently in a middle of a nationwide recall to replace the CP4 pumps with a CP3 hybrid no less.. Something ford and GM did do.

Would i love to buy a ford diesel,, right now NO.. especially with the cost of diesel vs gas the 7.3L is running to the front.. and NO to the CP4 pump..
The implementation of the CP4.2 on GM and Ram was different than Ford. GM chose to not include a lift pump like Ford and forced the CP4.2 to pull fuel from the fuel tank. We now know the CP4.2 doesn't tolerate air in the fuel so that was a bad decision by GM. RAM used a asymmetrical CP4.2 pump that was a disaster and then after a year went to a symmetrical style pump like Ford's version but the PR damage was already done. To date I don't personnally know or met someone who owns a 6.7PSD that had CP4.2 pump failure, but know/met several people who experienced CP4.2 failures on Rams and Duramax trucks. As a matter of fact I traveled to Atlanta earlier this week and the guy I shared a rental car with just recently experienced a CP4.2 pump failure on his Duramax truck.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 10:08 AM
  #129  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 2,681
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
Looks like Hot Shot secrets is blended with demusiliers as well.

How Does Water Get Into Diesel Fuel? (hotshotsecret.com)
Ran 4 tanks treated with Hot Shots EDT and don't see any fuel economy improvement nor do I see a reduction in regens. This is while running Exxon diesel efficient fuel.

Here's some fuel additive test that may or may not apply to extending the life of the CP4.2, but the rust test is a pretty telling.

 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 11:14 AM
  #130  
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
FTE Legend
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,979
Likes: 9,200
From: Western NY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by carl2591
I suppose the disaster kits can work,, but from the many post i have seen some state otherwise.. And having a 7.3L 2003 with some now 230K miles on the OEM pump I can tell you the difference between a CP4 failure and a HPOP failure are like 10K apart.. When a 7.3 pump goes it just stops running most of the time.. NO "**** the pants" type deal with injectors replace, lines, pump , and drop fuel tank to clean a 10-14K problem.

Ram ONLY used the CP4 for 2 yrs (2019 -2020) ,, GM dropped them after only 5 yrs, (2011 to 2016) but Ford continues to use them to the demise of many a owner. Yes many do go miles with no issues for sure. but when you see most of the issues on complaints sites is death wobble and fuel pump issues it kinda make sense it the biggest issues for many owners.

Not mention the lawsuits, ongoing lawsuits against Ford and GM about the fuel pumps,, Hell Ram is currently in a middle of a nationwide recall to replace the CP4 pumps with a CP3 hybrid no less.. Something ford and GM did do.

Would i love to buy a ford diesel,, right now NO.. especially with the cost of diesel vs gas the 7.3L is running to the front.. and NO to the CP4 pump..
Originally Posted by brokestroke
Watch a couple of the S&S videos if you don't believe it works. The way it is designed there is no possible way for the injectors to get contaminated. It physically can't, the path the fuel travels is completely blocked off.
S&S has a video where they drive a 6.7 with a damaged CP4.2 that they intentionally damaged one of the rollers, then put it back together and reinstalled it, with their Gen 2 kit, where the hose is longer than the Gen 1 kit, and they actually drove the truck in that condition.

It's here in Part 1.



Here in Part 2 they examine the rest of the system.



Just found this one, it's a quick recap of the first 2 videos.

 

Last edited by Overkill2; Dec 4, 2022 at 11:32 AM. Reason: Add link
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 12:47 PM
  #131  
seijirou's Avatar
seijirou
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 955
From: Kaufman TX
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by carl2591
I suppose the disaster kits can work,, but from the many post i have seen some state otherwise..
They aren't all made the same, and some of the shortcomings of the earlier revisions have been better addressed in later ones. There are no sure things in life, but running a current revision CP4 bypass the ability for failure to extend beyond the pump is virtually eliminated. Hypothetically material could still back-feed through 14 inches of line and up hill and upstream but in reality I'm doubtful that it's possible. If a person was still worried though they could add a 1 way valve in the hose. The only other avenue would be particles making it through 3 filters. Yeah it could happen but I'd bet on the heat death of the universe before it did.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2022 | 04:11 PM
  #132  
chadstickpoindexter's Avatar
chadstickpoindexter
Lead Driver
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 3,540
From: Uh oh, CA
Originally Posted by Overkill2
S&S has a video where they drive a 6.7 with a damaged CP4.2 that they intentionally damaged one of the rollers, then put it back together and reinstalled it, with their Gen 2 kit, where the hose is longer than the Gen 1 kit, and they actually drove the truck in that condition.

It's here in Part 1.

https://youtu.be/F-vZEH1yEs8


Here in Part 2 they examine the rest of the system.

https://youtu.be/ZHuA7VbXLY0


Just found this one, it's a quick recap of the first 2 videos.

https://youtu.be/hT0DbvrlN6o
I had seen these videos shared a few times, but just now watched them... wow! That's crazy at how much junk the DPK stopped and contained. Sure does make me happy I put one on my truck sooner rather than later! And for the record, I am glad I got my truck now. Despite the cost of diesel or the CP4. Sure, I wish fuel was less expensive, and that Ford would use a different fuel pump, but the S&S DPK kit sure does seem proven and gives me comfort when thinking about the CP4. As far as Dodge and GM, it sounds like the pump wasn't their issues so much as their own design around the pump... Ford must be doing it much better than those other guys.

 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2022 | 09:27 AM
  #133  
High_HP's Avatar
High_HP
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Likes: 179
I talked to a knowledgeable service advisor at my local dealer, not a small one either. They stated most failures they see are due to DEF or unleaded in the tank, user error. They said it is rare for them to see CP4 failure outside of those reasons.

They also said a DPK would not impact the warranty unless the kit directly causes the damage.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2022 | 11:36 AM
  #134  
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
FTE Legend
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,979
Likes: 9,200
From: Western NY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by High_HP
I talked to a knowledgeable service advisor at my local dealer, not a small one either. They stated most failures they see are due to DEF or unleaded in the tank, user error. They said it is rare for them to see CP4 failure outside of those reasons.

They also said a DPK would not impact the warranty unless the kit directly causes the damage.
Funny you mentioned that, about DEF, because I just heard of a guy who deals and sells Amish built sheds, just effed his Ford 6.7 Powerstroke because he pumped DEF from the pump and must have started it...

But this does go along with what the Ford tech who works at my buddy's shop said -- that most of the time it's DEF or maybe gas that someone puts in. But we do know that moisture contaminated fuel will and has taken out CP4.2s before.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2022 | 05:12 PM
  #135  
jollyrogr's Avatar
jollyrogr
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 949
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
The implementation of the CP4.2 on GM and Ram was different than Ford. GM chose to not include a lift pump like Ford and forced the CP4.2 to pull fuel from the fuel tank. We now know the CP4.2 doesn't tolerate air in the fuel so that was a bad decision by GM. RAM used a asymmetrical CP4.2 pump that was a disaster and then after a year went to a symmetrical style pump like Ford's version but the <acronym title="Page Ranking">PR</acronym> damage was already done. To date I don't personnally know or met someone who owns a 6.7PSD that had CP4.2 pump failure, but know/met several people who experienced CP4.2 failures on Rams and Duramax trucks. As a matter of fact I traveled to Atlanta earlier this week and the guy I shared a rental car with just recently experienced a CP4.2 pump failure on his Duramax truck.
GM didn't use lift pumps on the older Duramax trucks with CP3's either. It was rare but not unheard of for the lack of a supply pump to cause damage to the CP3. It was more common to simply cause a lack of power.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE