Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Excursion V10 and V/X codes pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2018 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
Excursion V10 and V/X codes pics

I have been doing lots of research on here and have decided to replace the front springs on my Excursion. It looks as though the front is just starting to sag, or the rear is sitting high, however you want to look at it. I don't want a harsh ride, as it is my wife's primary driver, just a little stiffer, sportier, more stable, etc etc. I was wanting to put the v codes on there, purchasing them from ATS. From what I have seen the ex codes sit a little high for my liking, and from what I have read maybe a little too stiff for the V10. We don't do any towing with it as I have a 7.3 super duty for that, so I intend to leave the rear springs alone and put a heavier-duty sway bar in.
I I would like to request pictures of the v codes in excursions that have the V10 engine. I have seen tons of pictures of them installed, but for some reason if people have listed in their signature what engine is in their truck it does not show up on the mobile site.

Thanks!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2018 | 08:03 PM
  #2  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
Saggy britches

 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2018 | 08:08 PM
  #3  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
I’d take some measurements and compare. That doesn’t look like a factory ride height. They may already have been swapped.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2018 | 08:31 PM
  #4  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by andym
I’d take some measurements and compare. That doesn’t look like a factory ride height. They may already have been swapped.
That is kind of what I was thinking, about the rear anyway, but the front to me looks like a typical low Excursion. That being said the front does sit higher then my 2002 f250, but that has 270,000 miles on it and the springs are arched backwards, x codes for that next. unfortunately I won't be home for another week and the measurements will have to wait till then.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2018 | 10:07 PM
  #5  
seijirou's Avatar
seijirou
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,863
Likes: 943
From: Kaufman TX
Club FTE Gold Member
C\X on mine with drop shackles in the front as well.

 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 05:31 AM
  #6  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by danno676
That is kind of what I was thinking, about the rear anyway, but the front to me looks like a typical low Excursion. That being said the front does sit higher then my 2002 f250, but that has 270,000 miles on it and the springs are arched backwards, x codes for that next. unfortunately I won't be home for another week and the measurements will have to wait till then.
The best place to start this quest is to get your exact measurements and go from there, this thread https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...easurents.html has the stock measurements as well as those from a wide variety of modified setups. You want to measure from the hub center to the top of the wheelwell arch, that takes out any tires size variations.
And remember, the shocks play the biggest part in determining the actual ride feel, springs are just there to carry the weight (but of course way too much spring will stiffen it up).
V-10s came from with C code front springs rated at 3680lbs (per pair), replacing those with a set of V codes (5200lbs) should net a 1.77" increase in ride height, W codes (5600) +2.77" and X codes (6000lbs) +2.90".
You do realize that a properly geared V-10 will out tow a stock 7.3, right? But I'm sure that your 7.3, like most, is not stock, so that is a non-issue and you are towing with the right truck.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 06:24 AM
  #7  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
^^^^^^^™ Awesome Thread!!!!

In reading this form for the past few weeks I have noticed that you and Stuart have deposited a wealth of information! That and ATS Junior, I have been able to make some very good and informed decisions about this excursion, and my f250. I can't say that I have any complaints about the way the Excursion rides with the current c codes, it does appear to have a recently installed set of Bilsteins installed on it. I just did not want to install the stiffest spring possible, or put it to high or put it too high in the air for our intended use of it.

​​​​​I can't say that I fully agree with the V10 out towing a 7.3, but I have never towed with a stock 7.3, and the V10's that I have towed with were not properly geared. I think my argument at that point would come in about fuel economy towing between the two. At any rate, the Excursion we just bought is very nice, and my super duty is mostly a work truck and commuter vehicle so it gets the abuse.

I checked "desktop site" on my phone and users signatures magically showed up, now I can see wjat I am comparing.

Thanks for the reply!!!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 07:04 AM
  #8  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
In my opinion, this forum is the best automotive forum on the web (at least in my experience) loaded with very knowledgeable and helpful folks that are willing to provide all sorts of info and guidance with very, very little of the drama or cliqueiness found on so many of the other forums around. I'm glad to be a small part of it!
These days finding a completely stock 7.3 is pretty rare, and finding a properly geared V-10 is nearly as rare, what was Ford thinking when they put 3.73 gears behind the 6.8? But yeah, once the PSD gets even a minor tune or tweek it will outshine the V-10 no matter the gasser's gears, and the 7.3 nearly always does better in the fuel mileage department. The Ohio Chapter here at FTE used to have an annual Get Together where they did a tow comparison between members rigs with a 15K lbs dump trailer loaded with gravel up a long winding hill. Some folks were surprised when the V-10 with 4.30 gears made the climb quicker than the stock 7.3 truck, the 3.73 V-10 didn't do nearly as well, unfortunately that's what most of them came with. I have towed a 12K enclosed trailer (28' loaded with Technical Rescue gear) with a stock 7.3 (4.88 geared) F-550, both Fire Dept rigs and I know my (mildly modified and geared) V-10 does a better job with our nearly 12K TT on the hitch. It's no match for any nicely modded PSD for sure, but it does the job pretty well.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 27, 2018 | 07:58 AM
  #9  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
Yeah, I will agree that a stock 7.3 it's not a super exciting towing machine. My first 7.3 towing experience was pretty disappointing, towing about 12,000 pounds of race car and trailer up in the mountains of West Virginia, it was struggling at best to maintain any type of speed upgrade. A couple of Banks options and a turbonetics turbo later and the truck had no problem maintaining 65-plus in overdrive. The Excursion I have now unfortunately has 3.73 gearing, that is another reason why I don't want to go to high because don't want to increase the tire size beyond a 285 75. I'm sure in the future I will upgrade to 4.30 or 4.88, but that is on down the road, at which point I may add a set of 2 in hangers and increase the tire size too. I assume Ford was trying to gain some type of highway MPG rating with the 3.73 gears, that is the only thing that I can guess. I will say that my hand calculated mileage of 12.5 is not too bad, my 7.3 averages just shy of 17. When I average the cost per mile based on the price per gallon between the two trucks, the gasser ex is cheaper to drive than the diesel. That was quite a pleasant surprise.

This site surely has been awesome.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2019 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
The best place to start this quest is to get your exact measurements and go from there, this thread https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...easurents.html has the stock measurements as well as those from a wide variety of modified setups. You want to measure from the hub center to the top of the wheelwell arch, that takes out any tires size variations.
And remember, the shocks play the biggest part in determining the actual ride feel, springs are just there to carry the weight (but of course way too much spring will stiffen it up).
V-10s came from with C code front springs rated at 3680lbs (per pair), replacing those with a set of V codes (5200lbs) should net a 1.77" increase in ride height, W codes (5600) +2.77" and X codes (6000lbs) +2.90".
You do realize that a properly geared V-10 will out tow a stock 7.3, right? But I'm sure that your 7.3, like most, is not stock, so that is a non-issue and you are towing with the right truck.
My measurements are
F 23.75
R 24.00
I will post in the thread that you gave me the link to as well.

I believe I will be doing V's on the EX and X's on the F250 (7.3).
Thanks for you help again, yours looks great. What kind of fuel mileage do you get? I know it's a v10....we're getting ~12.5, hand calculated, all city/country driving.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2019 | 07:36 PM
  #11  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by danno676
My measurements are
F 23.75
R 24.00
I will post in the thread that you gave me the link to as well.

I believe I will be doing V's on the EX and X's on the F250 (7.3).
Thanks for you help again, yours looks great. What kind of fuel mileage do you get? I know it's a v10....we're getting ~12.5, hand calculated, all city/country driving.
Thanks!
My EX doesn't see any daily driving these days, mostly all of its miles are logged with the 11,300 lb TT hanging off the hitch, there it gets 8/9 MPG on our mostly highway trips with a best yet of 9.5 over 420 miles. This past Summer we made a rare unloaded trip home near Philly from Columbus OH and it got 14.5 MPG with the cruise set at 65 MPH the entire way with the AC on about half the time. I always drive with an eye on the fuel mileage as I'm a hyper miler in real life where 63 MPG tanks are the norm in my '94 Geo Metro.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 07:09 AM
  #12  
danno676's Avatar
danno676
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 7
94 Geo metro...wow!
Seems like my 12.5 avg is about on par. I do want to one day do some mods, but for now I just have too many projects open.
Thanks for your input.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BeesX
Excursion - King of SUVs
58
Jun 12, 2025 02:27 PM
Tinman27
Excursion - King of SUVs
21
Feb 24, 2014 11:14 PM
Ultraboy
Excursion - King of SUVs
2
Sep 29, 2013 07:25 PM
mwsmith100
Excursion - King of SUVs
3
Jun 20, 2012 07:12 PM
dogbite1
Excursion - King of SUVs
3
Apr 12, 2007 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE