Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

66v8 progress report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2019 | 09:30 AM
  #121  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

No worries. Also, if you refer back to the photo in post #119 I believe you can see the adapter that they used at the factory for the brake line to master.

Chad
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 09:41 AM
  #122  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
I did notice the adapter. Very curious. Are you sure that's really an old '60s era photo?
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 10:06 AM
  #123  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

LOL. If I recall you have the MPC.

- Illustration Section 21 Page 16 part number 358165-S

Need anyone say more?

Chad
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 12:01 PM
  #124  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
The pictures in the Illustrations are generic, and clearly that is the '64 design. I found this picture on an old thread here posted by OldHarley back in '09:


And here is an NOS 64 MC with the copper cap:
 

Last edited by 66v8baby; May 7, 2019 at 12:09 PM. Reason: deleted '63
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 12:16 PM
  #125  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
You've made a good point though: the drawing shows they came from the factory with the fitting. I guess I have an oddball one that has the seat machined into it. I haven't been able to bleed the brakes yet, but if it works it's going to stay put.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 12:36 PM
  #126  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by 66v8baby
The pictures in the Illustrations are generic, and clearly that is the '64 design. I found this picture on an old thread here posted by OldHarley back in '09:
The picture you are showing that was posted by Old Harley is definitely a 1965 or 1966 there. You can also see the spring wire clamps on the short rubber tube coming off of the brake booster to the hard line. That's a detail that you could add for an original look.

Chad
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 01:16 PM
  #127  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Right again Chad! The picture is of a '66. I figured someone just grabbed the '64 MC (or maybe just the lid) because they had a good spare and needed it.

My '66 F250 also has power brakes and the original steel vacuum line. I plan to send it to classic Lines to be duplicated, then I'll add the Corbin clamps for the finishing touch.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2019 | 03:56 PM
  #128  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

Yes, I was admiring the vacuum line on your setup. Looks good. They sure routed it forward quite a ways before heading to the firewall. I bought a used booster and got the line with it, too. Needs some cleanup, but not too bad. I already took the booster apart.

Your engine compartment is looking fantastic!

Here's the one I got. Clip on the line but no attaching hardware for the clip to firewall. Can you take a close-up of that on your truck if you have you and a camera and the truck in the same place again?



Chad
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 8, 2019 | 06:09 AM
  #129  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Thanks Chad, it's taken way longer than I imagined to get here, but if I can get the brakes bled I'll be on the road this weekend.

I think this is what you're asking for:

My crappy hand bent line is not as crisp as the factory part even using soft copper/nickel tubing I couldn't get a tighter radius without collapsing the tube.

I also made mine longer than the originals. That's an easy fix though.
 

Last edited by 66v8baby; May 8, 2019 at 06:10 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old May 11, 2019 | 04:19 PM
  #130  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Got the interior in today. Getting close to the finish line!

The tach is an old school Fariah 5K, perfect for a truck.

Seat covers by SMS Auto.

The under dash evaporator is from a '66 Mustang. Unfortunately I wasn't able to finish making the hoses because they sent two 6' pieces of #8 hose instead of a #6 hose for the liquid line. I was able to make the discharge hose and the suction hose, but I was really hoping to wrap up the A/C this weekend. The shifter on the Tremec 5 speed worked out perfect. There's about a 1/2" gap between shifter handle and evaporator in 1st gear.

I had ordered a master cylinder rebuild kit because my NOS master is for some other application. The depth of the recess in the piston is much greater than stock and too much to be able to adjust. It was guaranteed delivery by Friday. Ha! Last I checked it was in San Juan Puerto Rico!! Gotta love the USPS.

I'm probably going to steal the one from my F250 to try to get it on the road.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2019 | 07:21 PM
  #131  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Almost done. I couldn't stand it any longer. I swiped the factory brake booster vacuum line and Corbin clamps from my F250. The obvious attach point for the line clip was where the ground strap attaches to the firewall.

The brakes are giving me fits. There's a leak when I press on the brakes, I believe it's where the hoses purchased from Mac's attach to the wheel cylinders. The hex on the hoses foul with the I beams such that you can't get a wrench on them, I ordered another pair from NPD. I hope they fit right.

I also did a little research on the master cylinder. I found a reference from the Mustang restoration crowd that beginning in January 1966, the master cylinders had the inverted flare seat machined into the master cylinder instead of using the fitting. Also, the part number in the MPC illustration catalog cannot be found in the text catalog, neither the 1975 edition nor the Sept 1967 edition which covers '57 to '67. The master cylinder fittings are in group 2076, but the '61-'66 F100 application isn't listed. The fitting for the '60 and earlier master cylinders uses NPT thread at the MC. I found out from a restorer/re-builder that the part number for the '61-'65 that's not listed used a 3/8-24 thread in the MC.

I used #8 reduced barrier hose for the suction and discharge hoses. The sight glass hose is from a '69 Mustang which has the quick disconnect. I cut the evaporator end off and put a #6 flare fitting on to mate with the '66 Mustang evaporator.

In addition to fixing the brake leaks, I need to adjust the hood latch before I can drive, but hopefully that won't be much longer.
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2019 | 09:13 AM
  #132  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

I saved off pics of the March 1966 built truck with under 12,000 miles on it and it has the same adapter as all of my trucks do. I've looked at every pic I have of that area on original trucks and can't come up with one that doesn't have the adapter. Can you? Just curious.

Chad
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2019 | 12:32 PM
  #133  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Originally Posted by TA455HO
I saved off pics of the March 1966 built truck with under 12,000 miles on it and it has the same adapter as all of my trucks do. I've looked at every pic I have of that area on original trucks and can't come up with one that doesn't have the adapter. Can you? Just curious.

Chad
No, it's a lot easier to find documentation on Mustangs than trucks, even though the Mustang MC is different than the truck design with the brake switch angling down instead of up, I figured it was reasonable to make the same change to both parts at the same time. I pulled my NOS Bendix master cylinder off to swap out the piston with one from an NOS truck rebuild kit. While I had it off I checked the date code on the bottom. The other ones I've seen start with a letter for the month, e.g. A106 would be January 10, 1966. Mine just has "145". My guess is 14 is the day of the month and 5 would be 1965, but with no letter I can't be certain of anything. It's also the only date code on it. Others I've seen have another one on the bowl that's usually easier to read.

NPD sells an adapter in their Mustang catalog that fits in MCs machined like mine and has a female flare fitting to give the appearance of the stock adapter for people who want a concourse appearance. I don't need to go that far... yet anyway. The cheap aftermarket MC I had barely lasted a year and not a single mile! At least with this one I have a reasonable expectation that it will last several years.

These old trucks will probably never have the dedicated hobbyists or documentation like the Mustang does, so it's mostly you and me that care about this level of detail. BTW, I ordered some split band radiator hose clamps from Ecklers that were listed for the 1960 T-bird and look just like the ones in the assembly line pictures you posted.
 
Reply
Old May 28, 2019 | 08:08 PM
  #134  
DX323's Avatar
DX323
5th Wheeling
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: El Dorado, AR
I've been replacing the brake lines and master cylinder in my '66. When I try and connect the line to the cylinder there's some movement like it isn't screwed in enough, but I can't tighten it anymore. Is that normal? Truck looks amazing by the way.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2019 | 06:13 AM
  #135  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
You need to use an adapter at the master cylinder. If it's an aftermarket MC you need a metric to SAE 3/8-24 female inverted flare fitting. If it's original you need a 3/8-24 male to 3/8-24 female inverted flare. Most of these single pot MCs don't have a seat machined into them like mine.

Thanks for the compliment
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE