Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

66v8 progress report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2017 | 12:59 PM
  #46  
SuperSabre's Avatar
SuperSabre
Laughing Gas
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 14
From: Tucson, Arizona
Let's try this diagram from the Jim Osborn Reproductions 1966 Ford Truck Wiring Diagram Manual. I went out and looked at my truck. There is a four wire black plastic gang plug which plugs into the voltage regulator which includes the green/red wire. Of course it disappears into a wrapped bundle that I don't want to unwrap, so you'll just have to use this picture. The wire number is 904. It shows a break at the firewall main disconnect. I think this should do it for you. Good luck.
 
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2017 | 05:30 PM
  #47  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Thanks SS, I have the Jim Osbourne reproduction wiring diagram, and with regards to the Custom cab auxiliary gauges, it's useless.

As an aerospace engineer, I think it is appalling. It depicts some but not all disconnects, it doesn't have separate drawings for the different options. It implies that what is installed on an F600 is the same as an F100. It's better than nothing, but I'm really hoping the shop manuals are much better.

I'm sure I can make the gauges work, and when the harness shows up I'll be able to do a better job of sorting out what connection goes where.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2017 | 05:19 PM
  #48  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Repro Wire harnesses

I talked to the fine folks at Narrangansett Reproductions and found out that the 904 green/red wire in the 10A655 harness is not used in my truck since it came equipped with the alternator light wiring as part of the 14401(?) headlight harness.

Also, although it isn't listed in their on-line catalog, the 10A655 harness (ammeter and oil pressure gauge) is available in reproduction as part number C666613.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 05:54 PM
  #49  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
oil bath breather

One of the oil bath breathers I recovered from the Utah F250 was stamped as shown below.

When I tried to clean it off with just water and a little dish detergent it started to smear so I stopped. I would love to get a stamp made but I don't know what I would have to do to get a license from Ford.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2017 | 02:01 AM
  #50  
KO1960's Avatar
KO1960
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 113
From: Chico, Ca.
https://northeastclassicfordparts.co...ner-decal.html
Not quite the same, but close.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2017 | 08:01 AM
  #51  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Originally Posted by KO1960
Interesting. I guess the -R is probably for a straight 6 whereas the -Y is for the V8. But I would also imagine they would have both been stamped rather than one use a decal.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 12:49 PM
  #52  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

I wouldn't be comparing this aspect of a Bronco directly to our trucks.

C6TF-9600-Y stamping is correct for (at least)

1966/67 F100/250 (4x2) 8-Cylinder 352
1965 F100/350 8-Cylinder 352
1964 N500/700 8-Cylinder 292
1964 F100/700, B500/700, C500/700, P350/500 8-Cylinder 292

The -Y is purely a coincidence and doesn't have anything to do with a Y in the VIN meaning 352 in 1966. Same letter of the alphabet, but no correlation in this case.

The actual part number for this filter is

C3TZ-9600-AA

Identified C6TF-9600-T,S,Y,Z - any of the letters are valid for this ID.

You can see the stamping and the separate decals in this close up of an engine still on the assembly line in 1966 model year.

Chad

.
 
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 01:41 PM
  #53  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

Here's one of a few that I have in the collection.

This one is identified C5TF-9600-B (also -A is valid) replaced by C3TZ-9600-AA (yours)

Actual part number for this one is C3TZ-9600-V

Applications: 1965 F100/350 8-Cylinder 352
1966 F100/250 (4 x 2) 8-Cylinder 352
F350 8-Cylinder 352

How does this differ from yours? Do you know?

Name:  FC2B3761-03B8-4A5E-9962-329B86C33991_zpsyc5haflx.jpg
Views: 696
Size:  98.2 KB

Also, have you ever had a chance to compare these 1966 4x2 oil bath air cleaners to the 1966 4x4 oil bath air cleaners. Anyone know what is different? It's pretty interesting.

Chad

.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 05:19 PM
  #54  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

Here's another with ID number C5TF-9600-F. I won't go into the details of this one, but used with C and N-series. Another example of the ink stamping and how it only varied slightly from model to model.

Name:  76BD443A-2447-4651-AFD1-48E254113723_zpsznsakj4r.jpg
Views: 676
Size:  109.2 KB

Chad

.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 11:06 AM
  #55  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Wow, that's just crazy having so many different ID numbers and then not even being the same as the part numbers. Visually at least they all look the same to me.

I'd still like to have a stamp made for mine.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 11:50 AM
  #56  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

A stamp would be great. Would be trick to make it so that the number could be swapped so the stamp would be universal, not that it would matter for a one time use.

They visually varied some. These two are of the "closed system" style where the snorkle is connected to the oil fill cap, which is a different style also than on the "open system"

Name:  1AD7981B-9B41-4C6E-8BBD-AA9CF17C321E_zpszao5k8dx.jpg
Views: 710
Size:  83.4 KB


Name:  BF29E24B-713C-4A5F-96DA-9953DE78B1F7_zpsyoqw2dry.jpg
Views: 691
Size:  129.4 KB

Here's two "open system" style, with a 2WD like yours on the right and the 1966 4WD for 8-Cylinder 352 on the left. Instead of the top fitting over the bottom like you might be used to, this one the bottom is more exposed and the top nests down inside of the bottom. The decals and ink stamping are actually on the outside of the BOTTOM piece, rather than the TOP piece like yours.

The one on the left is part number C6TZ-9600-E

Identification number C6TF-9600-D,E

Name:  088D1092-DE17-429E-9E12-2124384ACD27_zpsvnwalsph.jpg
Views: 693
Size:  82.7 KB

Here's the same one on the left as above, but on the right is the one for 1966 4WD with 6-Cylinder 240/300. Base is different since it is a 1V carb, but the top is the same.

Part number is C6TZ-9600-C

Identification numbers C6TF-9600-A,C,L,N

Name:  3F0A89E7-5894-4136-8757-D259533BA479_zpsgzrc5cnt.jpg
Views: 700
Size:  86.4 KB

Name:  C3A5B744-5185-42B5-9AD8-29142B27AC4F_zps8kunncgk.jpg
Views: 697
Size:  89.0 KB

LOTS of variations across all of the oil baths they made. This is just truck and what applied to 1966 F250 (and others).

Chad

.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 12:33 PM
  #57  
6t6merc's Avatar
6t6merc
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 46
From: Vancouver
Yes, that is interesting. I have never seen that stamp before. I wonder why it is described as "heavy duty" when it was the only one available...or was it?
Eric
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 12:39 PM
  #58  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

"Super Duty", "Heavy Duty". It's all Duty to me....lol. Or should I say "Doody". Ha!

Chad

.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 01:14 PM
  #59  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Having different ID/part numbers for the different styles makes sense: 6 cyl vs 8 cyl, closed emissions vs open emissions, 2WD vs 4WD (although why they should be different is not at all apparent).

All 3 of mine are identical; 2WD, 8 cyl, open emissions. Only on has the stamp legible enough to photograph.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 01:57 PM
  #60  
TA455HO's Avatar
TA455HO
Lead Gopher
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 10,028
Likes: 1,580
From: Seattle
Club FTE Silver Member

Interesting if nothing else. In 1966 they changed the oil bath on the 4WD trucks. I believe it has to do with extra baffling to help keep the oil in place while on some more extreme angles that were being achieved in them at the time.

Some
Name:  D198FCEE-9D16-4E40-A01B-9715AEEE4542_zpskwhnyzcf.jpg
Views: 687
Size:  48.3 KB
like that.

Chad

.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE