When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Installed a 3 gauge piller mount glow shift max tow gauge set. the trans temp from the gauge is 20 deg off lower than the ecm reading. With the stock tranny being soo sensitive to temp which reading should I use. I know , but 20deg does matter, Right. or am I being to ****.
I have a laser thermometer for things like this. I aim around under there, looking at all the different parts of the vehicle I can access externally. I can look for temps on brake rotors, fluids, bearings, U-joints, etc....
You might be able to settle the dispute between the gauges with that third opinion, but it's still a good question on the forum for those in-the-know about transmissions. Sadly, I know next to nothing about the inner-workings of the device that takes all the oomph from a 7.3L and puts it to the wheels.
Installed a 3 gauge piller mount glow shift max tow gauge set. the trans temp from the gauge is 20 deg off lower than the ecm reading. With the stock tranny being soo sensitive to temp which reading should I use. I know , but 20deg does matter, Right. or am I being to ****.
My isspro evo2 gauge matches my areoforxe gauge ecm trans temp reading almost perfectly.
It's pretty normal/common to see a difference in the two readings. I wondered the same a few years ago when I noticed it in my F-250. The gauge is reading from the test port on the passenger side of the tranny and the PCM is reading from the internal sensor.
From Mark K.
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
A 20°F degree difference between the test port and the internal sensor is normal. Sometimes the test port will be higher, sometimes the internal sensor will be higher. It depends on operating temperatures.
With my autometer trans temp gauge I see the same as you are reporting. When using the torque app the two are exactly 20 degrees different. my concern was that the PCM's reporting temp is always 20* higher than the analog.
My AutoMeter trans temp gauge and DP Infinity show about a 20* difference as well.
I saw a post by Mark K. in my travels where he stated that the stock sensor was very accurate, it's just the in-dash gauge that isn't. So, I usually go off of the PCM reading.
It's pretty normal/common to see a difference in the two readings. I wondered the same a few years ago when I noticed it in my F-250. The gauge is reading from the test port on the passenger side of the tranny and the PCM is reading from the internal sensor.
From Mark K.
Originally Posted by t.scottNDU
My AutoMeter trans temp gauge and DP Infinity show about a 20* difference as well.
I saw a post by Mark K. in my travels where he stated that the stock sensor was very accurate, it's just the in-dash gauge that isn't. So, I usually go off of the PCM reading.
Yep, that all correct. The sender in the test port is in a different location than the internal sensor. Temperatures vary across the trans, that's normal. You do t have a bad sender, you have a normal temperature distribution.
Yep, that all correct. The sender in the test port is in a different location than the internal sensor. Temperatures vary across the trans, that's normal. You do t have a bad sender, you have a normal temperature distribution.
As will I. My analog gauge is 10 degrees low until it reaches saturation based on ambient temp/load. I will be dumping my analog gauge and using the Torque app to monitor the more accurate internal temp.
Go tow up a mountain. You'll find that the two readings swap positions, though I can't tell you why. As Mark said, sometimes one is higher, sometimes the other one is.
My isspro evo2 gauge matches my areoforxe gauge ecm trans temp reading almost perfectly.
90pioneer... you are the perfect person to ask the following questions of, since you have used both a digital Aeroforce and an analog EV2 for reading the same thing (TFT).
- Which gauge is easier for you to monitor and understand at a glance?
- Which gauge is easer to read/see at night?
- Which gauge is easier to read/see during the day?
- Can the Aeroforce be set to automatically inverse the LCD when the lights are turned on?
- Can the Aeroforce illumination be dimmed in concert with the rest of the IP illumination?
The decision about which gauge to use should factor in the ergonomics of being able to monitor the data in all driving conditions, with as little driver involvement as possible. The readability issues might be more important than small temperature differences, because if it is too much of a hassle to see or understand the gauge at a glance, then the length of time the transmission is operating at an elevated temperature without the operators awareness might be worse than a lower reading that is easily seen and instantaneously comprehended.
My isspro reads 10 degrees cooler than the reading I get with scan gauge II. My system holds about 9 more quarts than stock so it stays relatively cool for the most part.
My system holds about 9 more quarts than stock so it stays relatively cool for the most part.
The extra 9 quarts equals 2.25 gallons.
The transmission pumps fluid at about 1.2 gallons per minute.
Therefore, in less than 2 minutes, that extra 9 quarts will all get pumped thru the heat generating torque converter and get just as hot as the rest of the fluid.
By contrast, the 6.0 tranny cooler in your sig is an effective means of REMOVING heat from the fluid, not just delaying for a couple minutes how hot all the fluid gets.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.