What have you done to your truck today?
#7533
#7535
#7536
#7537
Yeah, I was standing there when you figured out what you'd done. But you don't need to beat me up very much as I've done it to myself a bunch. Glad those bungs come 2 to a package.
#7539
Yesterday and tonight I finished putting my 9 inch all back together. Its got 2.75 gears for those 40 mile round trips 5 days a week. Im hoping I get a little bit better mpg.
<a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/685/dsc1097ff.jpg/'><img src='http://imageshack.us/a/img685/3872/dsc1097ff.jpg' border='0'/></a><br>Uploaded with <a target='_blank' href='http://imageshack.us'>ImageShack.us</a>
<a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/685/dsc1097ff.jpg/'><img src='http://imageshack.us/a/img685/3872/dsc1097ff.jpg' border='0'/></a><br>Uploaded with <a target='_blank' href='http://imageshack.us'>ImageShack.us</a>
#7540
That is a BIG change on the power, or small, part of the rod. And, it is a fairly big change on the cruise/economy end of the rod.
Did you drive it gently, so it stayed in the economy mode with the rod down, meaning on the .058" part? Make sure you try getting on it enough that the vacuum drops and the rods come up, as I'm afraid the .048" part will be too lean for power.
By the way, why "old409"? Are you, like myself, a fan of the GMC truck engine?
Did you drive it gently, so it stayed in the economy mode with the rod down, meaning on the .058" part? Make sure you try getting on it enough that the vacuum drops and the rods come up, as I'm afraid the .048" part will be too lean for power.
By the way, why "old409"? Are you, like myself, a fan of the GMC truck engine?
The truck seemed to run fine. There wasn't much change on my vacuum gauge. I really only drove it a couple miles so far. My exhaust isn't near a rich as it was.
I've had a lot of problems with the ethanol gas, softening the hose parts on the gas line and gumming up my filter. I hope the ethanol soon gets all the old scummy film cleaned off everything. My truck runs much better and I get 4 or 5 mpg more on the old gas but it is expensive and not always available.
#7541
Hey gary. Sorry I have not been on lately. things are more active than an invading bee hive here. How are things? Say, I have a problem. My 84 300 i6 has a fly wheel with a part nomber c6ae-6380-c (164tooth)and is eating starters. Is this the correct flywheel? and can I simply change the ring gear. It is plumb towup!!!! give me a call if you feel so inclined and still have my phone nomber.
#7542
#7543
The old409 comes from my days of running 348 and 409 Chevys. I loved those old "W" motors. I have a trip down the dragstrip in a Z11 409 on my bucket list. I had faster cars but none as fun to take down the strip.
The truck seemed to run fine. There wasn't much change on my vacuum gauge. I really only drove it a couple miles so far. My exhaust isn't near a rich as it was.
I've had a lot of problems with the ethanol gas, softening the hose parts on the gas line and gumming up my filter. I hope the ethanol soon gets all the old scummy film cleaned off everything. My truck runs much better and I get 4 or 5 mpg more on the old gas but it is expensive and not always available.
The truck seemed to run fine. There wasn't much change on my vacuum gauge. I really only drove it a couple miles so far. My exhaust isn't near a rich as it was.
I've had a lot of problems with the ethanol gas, softening the hose parts on the gas line and gumming up my filter. I hope the ethanol soon gets all the old scummy film cleaned off everything. My truck runs much better and I get 4 or 5 mpg more on the old gas but it is expensive and not always available.
I hope the rod change works out for you, but am a bit worried that the power A/F ratio will be too lean.
Hey gary. Sorry I have not been on lately. things are more active than an invading bee hive here. How are things? Say, I have a problem. My 84 300 i6 has a fly wheel with a part nomber c6ae-6380-c (164tooth)and is eating starters. Is this the correct flywheel? and can I simply change the ring gear. It is plumb towup!!!! give me a call if you feel so inclined and still have my phone nomber.
Let me know if you find one near me. I owe you, big time.
#7544
Remember Gary, that the number lost dane reads stamped or cast into a part is the engineering number, NOT the part number.
LD's engineering number shows the part was designed originally as an engine part for a 1966 full sized Ford, and the 'C' suffix denotes the third revision.
That basic part # (3680) would tend to be somewhere between the flywheel bolt and ring gear.
And a C6 should have a flex plate, not a flywheel.
LD's engineering number shows the part was designed originally as an engine part for a 1966 full sized Ford, and the 'C' suffix denotes the third revision.
That basic part # (3680) would tend to be somewhere between the flywheel bolt and ring gear.
And a C6 should have a flex plate, not a flywheel.
#7545
Remember Gary, that the number lost dane reads stamped or cast into a part is the engineering number, NOT the part number.
LD's engineering number shows the part was designed originally as an engine part for a 1966 full sized Ford, and the 'C' suffix denotes the third revision.
That basic part # (3680) would tend to be somewhere between the flywheel bolt and ring gear.
And a C6 should have a flex plate, not a flywheel.
LD's engineering number shows the part was designed originally as an engine part for a 1966 full sized Ford, and the 'C' suffix denotes the third revision.
That basic part # (3680) would tend to be somewhere between the flywheel bolt and ring gear.
And a C6 should have a flex plate, not a flywheel.
The discrepancy is the 6380. As you point out, probably by checking the MPC, it isn't a flywheel nor the bolt nor the ring gear. In fact, it doesn't show in the MPC.
As for the term "flywheel", I have always called it a flexplate when used on an automatic, but realized this morning that Ford calls it a flywheel - at least in the MPC. It shows #6375 and then "Flywheel Assy" and includes those for both manual transmissions as well as automatics. I'll look later, after I finish my coffee, and see what the factory shop manual calls it. I wonder if we've brought external terminology into Fordom.