Tuned Dyno Numbers
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Yall are gona like this.... post #127
I figured I'd save Matt the trouble of having to repost over here.
http://www.thedieselgarage.com/forum...=61721&page=13
Matt if you read this-
What kind of boost numbers are you seing?
How are the stock studs holding up? Or do you have aftermarket studs?
I figured I'd save Matt the trouble of having to repost over here.
http://www.thedieselgarage.com/forum...=61721&page=13
Matt if you read this-
What kind of boost numbers are you seing?
How are the stock studs holding up? Or do you have aftermarket studs?
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
The stock dmax injectors are good for 800RWHP for what it's worth. (not on a stock turbo obviously) The extra 1000psi is good for the CP3 if it's true but I wouldn't bet my life savings on it since I have seen a spike of 32,000 on a dmax CP3. 
Honestly I can't believe the stock tranny is holding it and not burning to nothing on the inside. Time will tell. So far I am impressed.
FWIW, a 4wheel drive (3wd actually) boosted lauches/burnouts are a blast.
Honestly I can't believe the stock tranny is holding it and not burning to nothing on the inside. Time will tell. So far I am impressed.
FWIW, a 4wheel drive (3wd actually) boosted lauches/burnouts are a blast.
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, NC
Originally Posted by duramaximizer
Honestly I can't believe the stock tranny is holding it and not burning to nothing on the inside. Time will tell. So far I am impressed.
I do know that the 2003-2007 transmissions will NOT hold 900+torque at the wheels even periodically. Supposedly these are the same transmissions internally, but I'm having a hard time believing that at this point...considering I'm approaching 10,000 tuned miles and the fluid is still blood red 
New User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by oilburnr
Maybe not, but removing the DPF will certainly signal modification and void your warranty just as fast.
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Wouldn't there be evidence that it had been removed though. I will admit I have not looked at this close. But It would probably be pretty easy to detect the DPF removal. Or maybe dealers wouldn't care if they had a plausible way to overlook it. After all they are probably not looking to void warrantys because they get paid by FORD.
Elder User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Rialto, Ca.
Originally Posted by oilburnr
Wouldn't there be evidence that it had been removed though. I will admit I have not looked at this close. But It would probably be pretty easy to detect the DPF removal. Or maybe dealers wouldn't care if they had a plausible way to overlook it. After all they are probably not looking to void warrantys because they get paid by FORD.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Las Vega$
Originally Posted by meanv10
Man i cant believe you guys wold risk voiding your warranty on a brand new truck that you guys just paid huge bucks for, just to make some more power. This is a new moter that hasn't even been out very long, what if they find some huge defect that costs thousands to fix and you get f ed, because you threw a tuner on it. sounds craze to me. This might be because I'm young and ignorant, or it could just be the pure jelose i have towards someone being able to just throw a tuner on a truck and make almost 500hp and like 900ftlbs and that is refricken diculous.( to bad ford couldnt find a way to get that kind of power right form the factory, don't get me wrong though if i was in you guys shoes with a 6.4 i would be tempted) just my 2cents
they've logged over a MILLION miles on these motors before finally making it to production for sale... i seriously doubt anything such as a "huge defect" would show itself now after all the testing they've done.
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Las Vega$
Originally Posted by 1968gtcs
Ford never left the game.
now modified is a different story, and yes it's a tad easier to get more power out of the CR, but ford was always right in the middle of the battle..
and i must say, the 6.4 is quite an impressive setup.. when i drove to NC to have matt build my motor he had just picked up his 08 the day before i got there... it still had the dealer plate on the back and was BONE STOCK..
and it was hanging w/my truck when it was stock w/a SCT turned up pretty high... i was impressed with how fast it was in stock trim !!
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Las Vega$
Originally Posted by barry1me
haha want to know the specific numbers with a DPF vs without......simple answer ~300rwhp with DPF and so far ~500RWHP without. For those that think they can run much of a tune and retain the DPF....they have another thing coming. DPF will fail at a tremdous rate when ran with a significent tune. FACT!
by just deleting the DPF, and running a tune that has does NOT ADD POWER, but simply turns off the dpf function, how much of a difference would that make ??
the thing is, since you NEED to get a tuner when deleting the DPF, you might as well add a few ponies while you are at it
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Las Vega$
Originally Posted by SANDDEMON08
This is information i have on the 150HP spartan tune from dyno runs i have made. It's not the new tune Matt is running but i would think the values would be the same for the DPF restrictions. Dont know what the cat yeilds yet havent taken it off. Note,After 3 dyno runs with the tunes and the DPF the HP started droping so we stoped. After turning it back to stock, the truck went right into regen, so it does fill the DPf fast.
Stock 6.4 with CAT and DPF (runs 1 thru 5)
Average 281 HP 496 TQ
6.4 with 150 HP spartan tune's with CAT and DPF (runs 6 thru 9)
Average 360 HP 634 TQ
6.4 with same spartan tune with CAT and without DPF (runs 10 thru 12)
Average 412 HP 731 TQ
Stock 6.4 with CAT and DPF (runs 1 thru 5)
Average 281 HP 496 TQ
6.4 with 150 HP spartan tune's with CAT and DPF (runs 6 thru 9)
Average 360 HP 634 TQ
6.4 with same spartan tune with CAT and without DPF (runs 10 thru 12)
Average 412 HP 731 TQ
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Las Vega$
Originally Posted by SANDDEMON08
Mabey its just me but im impressed that the engine performs so well at such a low RPM in comparision to the 6.oh runing well past 4200 RPM
but even though we can rev past 4200.. you've seen mine at 4500 on the dyno before... but remember the peak power figures were all at around 3k.. so basically it's not really worth it for me to rev it so high since it does nothing to increase my peak power
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Beaumont Texas
Originally Posted by LvTitan
hey shane did you ever get it to where you could run your afe intake w/out the CEL ??
