reprogrammers can be traced
How high is Bellefontaine, OH?
1550 above sea level......I live at 780
QUOTE]
Something in this thread just triggered my memory (senior moment). I had a SCMT on my 7.3 and was getting extreamly high EGT's empty. No weight but the truck. I sent it back to SC to be tested and recalibrated. They sent it back and the same thing was happening so I called and was told that because I was above 3000 feet that the egt temps were ok but if I was at sea level it would be a problem. I actually bought that line until just about 3 minutes ago when I said to myself, self, since when does altitude make a temp less hot??? It makes the air thinner but heat less, All righty then
The point behind this is they (all performance companies) claim alot to sell product but it is up to us to use common sense.
As far as tuners go I'm really in a quandry as to what to do......I'm anxiously waiting. Again hoping this thread is all a hoax, but probably not. Shut site down after my last post so didn't get post until this AM.
JB
(Does that sound like a Yogi Berra saying
)ONLY if you have to go in for warranty work FOR something that MAY be blamed on a tuner....
I've got 38K on mine and NO issues....
I would suggest you break in your truck normally and get past the "newlywed" period to determine if your truck has any "issues" to be taken care of.... after that go for it....
the differences are astounding...
The service writer called and said that after diagnosis it was a rear main seal but when I picked the truck up last night the service invoice actually showed that the front cover gasket had been replaced?
I also mentioned that I was seeing a P0480 code being thrown every now and then. This is a cooling fan 1 control circuit error or something like that.
I had set my SCMT back to stock tune and run the truck for about two weeks before taking it in. No questions or problems came up due to the fact that I had once had a tuner installed.
Given that I had told them that the truck was throwing a code they would have hooked the diagnostic system and pulled all the codes from the computer. If they were looking for traces of a tuner so that any warranty work could be denied, this was their chance.
But either they didn't look, or they didn't find anything.
The technician had gone home by the time I got there to pick up the truck and the service writer was pretty clueless as to what was done for the P0480 error if anything so I have to call back next week. And time will tell if they fixed the leak.
But it was all covered under warranty.
He might be feeding me full of poop just to make a sell. But I hope he's right.
I'll spill the beef in the morning, I'm tired and headed to bed
I'd do it now but its gonna be a loooong post...
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but I'm shocked that anyone is surprised to find out that there are more codes than generally published, and more information that can be tracked or ascertained. The PCM is a computer, it runs software & programs, it has memory. Attaching an aftermarket device to "crack" the codes is all well and dandy, but if anyone is seriously pushing the concept that a complete swap out of the program being utilized is not recorded or marked by other software on the PCM ... well ... you have another thing coming. The aftermarked Chip companies don't even have the first clue as to the complete contents of the memory on the PCM.
Neither is Ford interested in a rising cost of millions ... millions of dollars expended on warranty repairs due to running power-up program swaps. Warranty policies, cost controls, maintenance policies and etc. are all under discussion presently. It's not a matter of knowing when programs have been swapped or memory changes ... it's a matter of what the response needs to be and how Ford will deal with it in a way that is fair to consumers ... but also fair to producers.
Look at the PXXXX listings you have and think about all those missing numbers in-between. Why don't you have all the numbers?
Once FTE finds a way to bring in some official Ford-contacts and knowledge, then you'd see this sight take off. But I guess that a business deal and strategy that may not be possible within the realm of experience running this one.
The 2005 May be able to record a PCM reflash but that is yet to be proved or disproved.
There are some World Class Computer Geeks on this forum that have researched this so quit worrying about it. If anyone asks you to explain a p-603 code tell them you cleaned the battery terminals.
By the way, you can clear these codes with the Predator's code reading/clearing function.
the smart way to design & build the PCM would be to build it dump-capable at a level beyond normal maintenance, and not put this, or the tool out to the dealerships. There's a good reason for this. If the tech/dealership had full access, then absolutely everything could be reset or written over. Fomoco would have no possible method to ascertain a bottom line. Additionally, you may not always be able to completely trust what is being done at the dealership level (e.g. it's the Tech's buddy's truck, and the Tech is more loyal to the buddy). So if nothing else, it would seem to me to be prudent to have the capability, when needed, to come in with the correct know-all tool, and knowing the dates involved would be important as well. That would be important for any crucial claims.Futhermore, the direction that manufacturers are taking ultimately is really to prevent bogus lawsuits, in which the driver was being stupid, and then wants to sue for $millions.
Just my opinion.
or just surmising
or just "blowviating" - to coin a phrase

ANYTHING is possible - really it is... but...
Curious that the same company that would delete a $7 hood blanket, might consider spending a LOT of money - both hardware and software wise to do this....
an auto is a VERY hostile place for electronics...
heat, vibration, variations power levels... etc...
just wondering how much WOULD be done.... given the $$$$'s
************************************
I can think of a hundred ways to help my corporation with software....
but until the ROI is approved by 5 levels of mgmt... and funded...
it don't happen
Last edited by jdadamsjr; Oct 23, 2004 at 11:40 PM.








