Notices

Cam help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2020 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
77custom408's Avatar
77custom408
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville Arkansas
Cam help

I’m gathering the parts now for my 400 build for my Bronco and I’m looking to get 400hp/450tq out of this build and need some advice on a camshaft to get me there, I’m looking at 3 options right now and I was gonna use a Crane standard base roller cam with link bar lifters but $1,200 for the set up nah I’ll stick to flat tappet.
here is what I have so far for my motor.

TF 195 72cc heads
Holley SA 670 carb
Edelbrock manifold
FK water pump
Cloyes timing chain
every ARP bolt or stud I can find
gonna use TMeyer pistons

the 3 cam options I’m considering are
Comp XE274H
Comp 268H
or a custom grind from a MPG

any advice on a cam would be appreciated thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2020 | 08:07 PM
  #2  
kopfenjager's Avatar
kopfenjager
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 3
From: In the woods of Oregon
Comp XE274H should net you well over 400hp with those heads, and the Comp 268H is going to net you just a smidge under 400hp. Both will provide well over 450tq. paying attention to DCR your going to want to up your compression for the XE274H, with the 268H you should be fine with the compression you have. And depending on what you want, the edelbrock manifold will net you a little more torque and the weind manifold gives a little more horsepower. I found on my build that the ports on the weind manifold matched the TFS 195 heads a whole lot better then the edelbrock and made gasket matching a bunch easier.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2020 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
77custom408's Avatar
77custom408
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville Arkansas
Do you think with my heads and Tim’s pistons that I wouldn’t have enough compression for the XE274 cam? What cam would you recommend to get me to my goals? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2020 | 09:55 PM
  #4  
77custom408's Avatar
77custom408
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville Arkansas
Also I went with the Edelbrock intake over the Weiand after reading lots of reviews on it, I have a Weiand CJ Intake to match my FR SCJ heads for my 521 build and it’s a nice piece but I heard the ones made for the 400 were junk but I have no experience with them
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2020 | 03:54 PM
  #5  
kopfenjager's Avatar
kopfenjager
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 3
From: In the woods of Oregon
I have found that the new weinds are a better manifold. Larger, rounder, more even runners and it lined up better with the ports in my TFS 195 heads. There is a thread were Tim does a dyno test with both manifolds. The weind made 473hp and 503tq and the edelbrock made 452hp and 512tq.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...shoot-out.html
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2020 | 08:48 PM
  #6  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 385
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
IMHO, Comp is a mass production (McDonald's type) company which - seems to have experience more cam lobe failures than most and places the blame on the low ZDDP in the oils...then experiences valve spring failure, and it just does a cycle..... the owner, is an attorney (or at least was) and the atmosphere inside Comp has ranged from good to beyond bad...to the point about 10 years ago they hired (IIRR) Harvey Cranes son to help straighten the place out.... IIRR he was there for a few years but left.. like just about every senior machinist.

With regards to their cams billets, I highly suspect that they are also using Chinese & they do not include Parkerizing their cams unless you want to pay extra for it (Parkerizing is the final step and a crucial step to help break the cam in- a heated acid bath that microscopically etches the metal surface and adds a very thin layer of graphite coating which allows the cam lube to hang onto and penetrate into the cam surface during cam break in) unless you specifically request and pay additional money for it. Some will swear by their Comp Cam and when I have spoken and inquired with them I have found in most cases the cam is cut on Comps 8620 core (copper colored base) which runs $400+. But the typical MacD production cam has a silver / metal camshaft made from the cheaper 5150 cores that won't last 20K miles before wiping out and failing.

This is a not so unusual posting about Comp and their components…..


http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/vi...-camshaft.html

Considering the cam has such critical importance to the engines performance and life, to me it makes sense to use a cam grinder who will talk with you directly- even modify the cam grind to fit your needs even better and to address the possibility of cam lobe failure with the new oils. When it comes to making an engine breathe, there are so many variables including elevation, humidity, fuel blends/available octane, most cam mfgs will vary a "core grind pattern" to match the external impactors in addition to the internal impactors- which today IMHO makes the different between and engine that runs well, to one that just seems to run a little bit better, smoother and gets better mileage than expected.

With regards to price...the difference is nil- especially considering its cheap insurance to know exactly who is machining such a critical part for your engine. And remember, advertized lift/duration/lobe separation is just that- advertized and not the specific grind including ramp profile that is used on the cam. Which is why you can take to cams with the same lift/duration (nearly) from 2 different cam grinders and each will perform differently. Also, avoid Eddy cams like the plague.... they really have nothing as far as design goes that's really good or really bad, its just ok from a performance standpoint but QA.... is back to where they were in the mid 80's when the place darn near closed it's doors as far as the cams go.... you couldn't get me to put one of their cams in any of my engines....lobe specs off as much as .060 has been reported.

I highly recommend Iskenderian (who I personally know to this day physically tests/inspects every single valve spring before it leaves the shop) & Crower & Chet Herbert & Lunati...all are family owned, been grinding cams for decades, and both will even re-grind your oem cam if possible- saving you even more $.

I don't want to beat the Comp Cam QA issue to death, but here are just a few examples to validate the “McDonald’s environment” of which operate:


Tech Support Issue:
Fuel Pump Rebuild


Valvetrain Failure:


Classic Cam Failure:
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/more...ure-48577.html


Cam Lobe Fracturing:
http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=458553

Cam Failure:

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=121078


FAIL Comp cams trunion- Rockwell hardness low:
http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...n-upgrade.html


2nd Cam Failure:
http://www.performanceboats.com/gn7-...p-failure.html


Major problems with Comp Cams hydraulic roller lifters :
Major problems with Comp Cams hydraulic roller lifters


COMP CAMS FAIL (endless)
http://truestreetcars.com/forums/gen...cams-fail.html


Comp Cams Ultra Gold Aluminum Roller Rocker Failure
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=388981


Comp Cams 918 spring failures
http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/ls1-...ilures-526319/


Cam Failure:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=389981
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
my-ford
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Feb 15, 2016 04:19 PM
72fordgts
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
12
Nov 6, 2014 01:49 AM
AntiHero55
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jun 15, 2010 02:54 PM
flareside_thunder
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
May 31, 2007 06:42 PM
rogue69
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
7
Jun 6, 2003 08:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE