Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

1972 Side mount tank replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 01:24 PM
  #1  
thalvorson's Avatar
thalvorson
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
1972 Side mount tank replacement

All,

I am new to the forum today. Just Bought a 1972 F100 RANGER XLT for my son and I to restore. The truck will be his daily driver at some point he is only 14 now. The truck has been sitting a long time so we are trying to replace the fuel tanks. Replacing seems easier and safer then cleaning the old ones out. I would like to remove the one in the cab and just go with the side mount tank. When looking on sites like LMC/NPD I only see 72 tanks with Evaporated Emission controls. Does anyone know where I can get a '72 non emission tank or will some other year tank work? Can I just bypass the emission somehow?

I will also need to remove the tank switch from the floor and dash at some point. I assume this will be straight forward. Thoughts?
Thank you for your time.

Tim
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 02:33 PM
  #2  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by thalvorson
Just Bought a 1972 F100 RANGER XLT for my son and I to restore. The truck will be his daily driver at some point he is only 14 now. The truck has been sitting a long time so we are trying to replace the fuel tanks.

I would like to remove the one in the cab (Reproduced!) and just go with the side mount (mid-ship) tank.

When looking on sites like LMC/NPD I only see 72 tanks with Evaporated Emission controls. Does anyone know where I can get a '72 non emission tank or will some other year tank work?

Can I just bypass the emission somehow?
No.
The Evaporative Emission fuel tank has a large hole next to the fuel tank sending unit for the fuel vapor valve. There's no plug available to plug this hole.

The original 1970/72 F100/350 mid-ship fuel tank (without Evaporative Emission) contained 25 gallons. It was replaced by Ford (twice) with a 22.5 gallon tank.

D8TZ-9002-J (replaced D1TZ-9002-B & D3TZ-9002-B) .. 22.5 Gallon Mid-Ship Fuel Tank - Use without Evaporative Emission / Obsolete

1970/72 F100/250 2WD & F350 except Crew Cab / 1973/74 F250 2WD & F350 except Crew Cab / 1975/77 F150/250 2WD & F350 except Crew Cab / 1977/78 F250 4WD Crew Cab.

NOS PARTS SOURCE in Olathe KS has 1 = 913-220-5746.

GREEN SALES CO. in Cincinnati OH has 1 = 800-543-4959.

MILLER OBSOLETE PARTS in Binghamton NY has 1 = 607-722-5371.

This tank may be reproduced....you'll have to check the various repro parts sellers (Carpenter/LMC/NPD and etc.).
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
thalvorson's Avatar
thalvorson
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
NumberDummy,

Thanks for the info I will put it to good use.

TIm
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 04:10 AM
  #4  
GaryKip's Avatar
GaryKip
Logistics Pro
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 14
From: Lind, WA- Eastern WA
thalvorson, welcome to the forum. By keeping the tank valve, it makes a good anti-theft device.-Just a thought.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 11:30 AM
  #5  
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
Welcome to FTE and the Bumpside Kingdom!
Congrats on the Father/Son project. Is this the same big Tim Halvorson that worked at a couple Ford dealers where I've worked here in Phoenix Metro area?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 11:34 AM
  #6  
thalvorson's Avatar
thalvorson
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
JEFFFAFA,

No it is not. We are actually located in moscow Idaho. A small town in the northern part of the state on the border with Washington state.

Tim
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 11:37 AM
  #7  
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
Originally Posted by thalvorson
JEFFFAFA,

No it is not. We are actually located in moscow Idaho. A small town in the northern part of the state on the border with Washington state.

Tim
Ah. Thanks for the reply. I thought maybe you were the Tim I knew and had moved to Idaho.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2016 | 01:05 AM
  #8  
tbirdscott's Avatar
tbirdscott
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 561
Likes: 2
From: Willow River B.C.
Just plug off the emissions evap lines and you're good to go, no problem. I believe only 71-72 had them. I used an earlier (67-70 not sure) fuel tank in my 72. No extra lines on those years. Only fuel filler and fuel outlet line.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 10:02 PM
  #9  
1972-34ton's Avatar
1972-34ton
Rabbit-Hole Researcher
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 466
Likes: 6
From: Middle of Ohio
Club FTE Gold Member
Some tank replacement thoughts.

Just some thoughts here..., the Later fuel tank has advantages.

It provides an extra place to add a return line, if you want to completely fix any hot-start or vapor-lock issues with a gas loop like in modern vehicles. Alternatively, you may add an electric pump, and want a return line.

Less chance of filling the tank on a cold morning, and finding that expansion has gas spilling out later on a hot day.

Think twice about removing the in-cab tank. It works when the fuel pump is weak. There is no safety issue, according to safety statistics. (It is up out of the way.) And, if you bash the lower tank on a sharp rock, the upper tank still works.

Do use real gas-hose for the filler when you replace it. Truck repair places have it cheaper in 'stick' form. You might add a connector strap to keep bad guys from 'unscrewing' the filler neck to steal gas. It goes under the band-clamps. (If you have a locking cap.)

2 cents is what that is worth!
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2016 | 07:10 AM
  #10  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
Fuel tank

Would it be safe to assume that this tank-D8tz-9002-J- will fit in my 69 f-250?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2016 | 11:22 AM
  #11  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mrpotatohead
Would it be safe to assume that this tank: D8TZ-9002-J will fit in my 69 F250?
It's not safe to assume anything, especially when it comes to FoMoCo!

1967/69 Stylesides used a different 25 gallon auxiliary fuel tank (C8TZ-9002-C replaced C7TZ-9002-A) than 1970/72 and the 1973/78's that used this D8TZ-9002-J fuel tank.

You cannot use the D8TZ-J fuel tank in a 1967/69 unless you also swap in the 1970/72 fuel filler tube.

1967/69: The fuel cap/fuel filler tube pokes thru the quarter panel above the scallop (bumpside) line.

1970/72: The fuel cap/fuel filler tube pokes thru the quarter panel below the scallop (bumpside) line.

tbirdscott: Evaporative Emission introduced in 1970 F100's, but not all these trucks came with it. Was mandatory in sold new in CA F100's, may have been mandatory in other states.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2016 | 12:21 PM
  #12  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
Bill I was hoping you would chime in since you seem to have a vast knowledge of old fords. Green sales says they have a C7TZ-9002-A that they "show" is supposed to fit. They have sent me numerous pictures and as far as I can tell, it looks exactly like my original tank. Any input you can offer is greatly appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2016 | 12:33 PM
  #13  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by NumberDummy

1967/69 Stylesides used a different 25 gallon auxiliary fuel tank (C8TZ-9002-C replaced > > C7TZ-9002-A) than 1970/72 and the 1973/78's that used this D8TZ-9002-J fuel tank.
C7TZ-9002-A =

GREEN SALES CO. in Cincinnati OH has 1 = 800-543-4959.

HIGH BUCK! BOB ALLEN FORD in Overland Park KS has 1 = 913-381-2999.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C8TZ-9002-C =

No Ford dealer or obsolete parts vendor has any.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2016 | 04:23 PM
  #14  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
Ordered one today from Greens. thanks Bill. Now if I only I can find a C8TF-9275-A sending unit....
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2016 | 04:40 PM
  #15  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mrpotatohead
Ordered one today from Greens. thanks Bill. Now if I only I can find a C8TF-9275-A sending unit....
C8TF-9275-A is not the part number, it's the ID number marked on the sending unit. Is this the one you have now, or did someone give you this number assuming it's the part number?

The reason I ask is, your "About Me" profile says: 1967 F100. 1967 uses a different auxiliary fuel tank sending unit (C7TZ-9275-B - 6 available NOS) than 1968/72.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE