Throttle Response
TSB 11-7-7
Some 2011 F-150 and 2011-2012 Mustang vehicles equipped with 5.0L engine may have unauthorized modifications to the powertrain hardware and/or calibration which may result in exceeding component design limits. Such modifications could cause damage to the powertrain and/or void the factory powertrain warranty.
Kinda thought so. I'm gonna ask my dealer anyway. I'm sure I'll get the same response.
I still don't understand why the throttle is restricted at lower RPM. On another thread a post said that it was to reduce driveline stress, but if these same transmissions and axles can handle the massive torque of the diesels...?
I don't like the way the tranny upshifts so early, especially into overdrive gears at 35 mph (?), but something that bothers me just as much is that (as with most automatics) you can't always apply power gradually, for example, going up a moderate hill, you begin to slow down, and gradually pressing more on the gas, nothing, nothing, then, wham!, it drops 2 gears and you start accelerating when you just wanted a constant speed. Obviously this can just be inherent in the way auto's work, but it seems more pronounced with this drivetrain. I wish you could use more of the power available in the current gear (without lugging it of course).
With these low-speed upshifts, I worry a bit about lugging... saving a tiny amount of gas, but mistreating the engine? >grumble< I guess I just need to start using full manual (I have been locking out 5th and 6th around town, which helps), or I'll never be satisfied. Or maybe get a tuner! You know, I have never even had this 2012 reflashed with any newer software Ford has issued. I have my complaints, but nothing's really wrong - no strange shifting or revving or whatever - at least it's predictable. I don't want to get a new flash only to find that the bean-counters have made it lug even more.
I wonder how many parameters the PCM uses to decide not just gear selection and throttle opening, but the variable cam timing, etc. If it is using the data from the sensors for the stability control, it could be considering uphill / downhill, cornering g's... If I were writing the program I would have it downshift earlier uphill for one thing. Could it calculate load/trailer weight and factor that into its decisions? Now I have to go think about physics.
Well, on and on I go with the topics, but playing with the Tow/Haul mode with no load the other day, I crested a small hill, and I'm sure the DBW actually applied throttle - I think it was holding the lower gear but it did not want a jarring onset of engine breaking, perhaps destabilizing a trailer or whatever. It just surprised me, in the wake of all of these unintentional acceleration problems various car companies have had lately, that a system would actually apply power. I do think that is good programming and would help prevent instability. I just wish overall the engineers would not have to serve the lawyers and bean-counters so much...
Heck a thread from 2012 hasn't even had time to be forgotten, I remember this thread after starting to read it again.
Heck a thread from 2012 hasn't even had time to be forgotten, I remember this thread after starting to read it again.
Denny
Generally you can find something you wish was improved in any vehicle, but overall this engine can put down the power, even if it has not been tuned, and it is developing a very good track record for durability and reliability. Had to clear that up especially for all those shopping for a truck. I have had three Triton-powered trucks and the 6.2 is an entirely different animal.












