When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Where will the PTO port be located on the transmission?<O</O The PTO unit is located on the drivers side of the transmission and there are aftermarket units being developed by M<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com</st1:City>uncie and <st1:City w:st="on">Chelsea</st1:City>. Following website gives a great overview of it. The 2011 Ford Super Duty Trucks - Coming Spring 2010 | The Official Site of Ford Super Duty Trucks)<O</O
I guess my point was kinda hidden in the long paragraph. Why is there a PTO port only on one side of the transmission? In a 4x4 model, the side the transfer case is on, it is impossible to run a drive shaft from the PTO port through the tranfer case to what ever you are running underneath the bed. Some PTO driven contraptions are NOT hydraulically driven. They need a mechanical drive shaft to run them. Why is it only 15 years ago many of the trannys had PTO ports on both sides of the tranny, (if not, some had one on the transfer case). Yet we cant seem to get one now. Just climb under a pre 99 ford truck with a manual (zf5), There is a PTO port on both sides. Seems fairly straightforward to me.
Sorry I am not trying to be a Butt, but I just boggles my mind why a 4x4 commercial truck (f 3-550 cab and chassi) is not set up with even a simple usable PTO port for mechanical driven contraptions.
Thank you Adam for trying to answering my question...
..."Will the 2011 SD's have a lower or higher operating cost that the 6.4's?
Looking at this from the engine side, we've made every effort to further improve. For example, the oil capacity has been optimized, so your oil change is now only 13 quarts...."
But you really didn't answer my question ...smaller oil capacity "may" help if the OCIs are at least as long (or longer) in the severe duty cycle we operate in but factoring in the expense of the urea and other maintenance intervals for servicable items etc I would have thought someone in Detroit would have run this analysis.
And if I may ask a second question has there been any improvement of the front ball joints on the SD's?
sounds better the more he talks about it especially the part about turbo and egr servicing but i will hold off judgment until we see after people start buying but at least they are talking to us its a good start
I don't think it was designed that way. It's just one of those things they figured out after the motor was released.
Long before any prototype trucks were built the entire truck, including the engine compartment, were designed in CAD. The engineers were able to look at it and knew how hard it would be to work on the engine. Sometimes engineering has to make do with what styling creates.
Thanks for the response Adam!! This is a great thread.
One other question regarding the test fleet - have there been any issues identified that will need to be addressed before full production begins (engine, drivetrain, electrical/electronic, suspension, frame / structural, etc)?
Another question Adam... I know the GM challenge sounds elementary but the tug of war statements about the Duramax vs. the Powerstroke seems a little bold. What are your thoughts?
I'm sure hoping Ford will advertise it's strengths against the competition like the F150 campaign.
Thanks for the response Adam!! This is a great thread.
One other question regarding the test fleet - have there been any issues identified that will need to be addressed before full production begins (engine, drivetrain, electrical/electronic, suspension, frame / structural, etc)?
Hello Bismic,
Are you thinking about jumping ship from the 6.0L?
Another question Adam... And thanks for answering questions today!
I keep hearing the statement that the 6.7 fuel economy will be "Class Leading". But would like a little more detail so could you select the list below that best fits this description of "Class Leading":
A. Better fuel economy than future 2011 diesel offerings
B. Better fuel economy than the 6.4
C. Better fuel economy than the 6.0
D. Better fuel economy than the 7.3
E. All the above
Hello Bismic,
Are you thinking about jumping ship from the 6.0L?
Hello Troy -
Not at all. This 6.0L has been the best truck I have ever owned. However, I am interested in the 6.7L innovations and learning all I can from the beginning. I may be in the market for one in 3-4 years. At that point, I may consider buying a "lightly used" one. At 400HP, there may not be very many in that category!
Not at all. This 6.0L has been the best truck I have ever owned. However, I am interested in the 6.7L innovations and learning all I can from the beginning. I may be in the market for one in 3-4 years. At that point, I may consider buying a "lightly used" one. At 400HP, there may not be very many in that category!
The info on the 6 speed trans. and the economy claims are really getting under my skin.
Adam: Can you please keep in mind MPG values when towing? Running empty is one thing but most of us run at or near the GCWR most of the time. These are the numbers we need to know!
right.. and the words bother me too.. lots of room for vague success.. (marketing speak.. I see that in my industry (enterprise computer software) all the time)
Class Leading can be 1 mpg difference.. I see this on the chevy ads comparing against honda.. same city, +1 highway.. to me personally those are identical.
5mpg is my difference window. (on both city & highway).
on my 08 F350/4.10 I am at 12.5 solid empty, and 9ish loaded with just 7k trailer.
i'm looking for 18empty/13-15 with 7k. so that is 50% better.
if my regular fuel bill goes down, then its different.. if not, not. I drive roughly the same distance all the time.
so, 6speed tranny, gear change to 3.55 from 4.10 and engine improvements MIGHT be capable of all that.. torque down low and lower 1st gear for takeoff.