Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

adding lubricity?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #31  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by IABill
If you want the straight data and I am not promoting this other site, but
this is the most comprehensive data I have ever seen. I printed a hard copy from dieselplace dot com. search for: lubricity additive study results. It was done at the southwest research lab in the great state of Texas.
Results were in order of best lubricity to least:
#1. REG 2% bio diesel blend with 98% pump diesel
#2. Opti Lube XPD 13oz per 26 gallons
#3 FPPF RV,Bus,SUV Diesel treatment 5.2oz per 26 gal
#4 Opti Lube summer blend multi purpose 1.11 oz per 26 gal
#5 Opti Lube winter blend 6.5 oz per.....
#6 Schaeffer Diesel treat 2000 3.32 oz per...
#7 Super Tech Outboard 2-cycle TC-3W 16.64 oz per....
#8 Stanadyne lubricity formula 3.32 oz per....
#9 Amsoil Diesel concentrate 5.2 oz per....
#10 Power Service Diesel Kleen + Cetane Boost 8.32 oz per....

There is a lot more there Tried to scan & copy but I cant get it to work...

None of it addresses how the lubricity will affect anything in the real world. Nobody shows us what the point of diminishing returns is which is real important. All they allude to is "Some is good, more is better". Much like the supplements they sell at Walgreens. All they talk about is how my brand has more of this than yours. Not a word on bio availability.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 09:04 PM
  #32  
IABill's Avatar
IABill
More Turbo
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 12
From: Cumming, Iowa
Question

Did you locate & read it?
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 10:19 PM
  #33  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by IABill
Did you locate & read it?
http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=177728

Yes, I have read it and didn't think much of it. The only information I would consider valuable, and I use that term loosely, is the ranking of which snake oil, aka additive, is better than the other. Or as the Shania Twain song goes "That don't impress me much".

They seem to worship without question the magic number of 460. Why 460? Why not 400? 380? 200? As I have often asked and nobody can say with certainty "What is the point of diminishing returns?" Show me on a component or system level what the benefits of going from 520 to 460 is. Show me that for ever 10 points, the life is changed by X%. I realize even that won't be "real life" but it is reasonably close. Show me that by going from 520 to 460, the injector life is extended by say 10%. That will help me calculate the costs vs benefits. What happens when you go below 460? Again, no answer.

Yes, as a manufacturer, you bet I would be for any of these snake oils that will give any sort of improvement. Why? Because ever mile or day more you can go without a breakdown is a day or mile closer to the warranty going out. Best of all, it is on YOUR dime, not mine. Doesn't cost me a thing and it lowers my warranty coverage. Why not? As a consumer, I want to know what this "extension" is going to cost me. I want to know if it is going to cost me $10 to save $5 or vice versa.

Let me ask you this. If these snake oils do as much as the manufacturers like to think, why haven't they done a proper test instead of using these "studies" to infer you need their snake oil? After all, if you are selling it, isn't the onus on you to prove efficacy instead of trying to use these "studies" to hint at reasons why the consumer should buy their snake oil?
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 10:59 PM
  #34  
WHITE_POWERSTROKE's Avatar
WHITE_POWERSTROKE
New User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
this information im about to share comes from technicians that i know both ones that work on the heavy duty semi's and light duty desiel pickups. i've been told tranny fluid is an excellent additive for multiple reasons. not only is it a good lubricant it is also a high detergent additive so it keeps your injectors and things of that nature clean. then from there it is also extremely flammable under pressure and has been known to increase the cetane level. i have also heard about the 2 stroke option but i heard from a handful of people that the 2 stroke will clog fuel filters and injectors not 100% sure sounds like you guys are having alot of success with it but here's a thought my buddies at ford run 80% used atf that they have filtered and 20% pump diesel in their trucks they run quieter and get approxametely 1.5 mpg better then on pump alone. just something to think about
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #35  
Rofflecat's Avatar
Rofflecat
New User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Hubert
Originally Posted by aklim
They seem to worship without question the magic number of 460. Why 460? Why not 400? 380? 200? As I have often asked and nobody can say with certainty "What is the point of diminishing returns?" Show me on a component or system level what the benefits of going from 520 to 460 is. Show me that for ever 10 points, the life is changed by X%. I realize even that won't be "real life" but it is reasonably close. Show me that by going from 520 to 460, the injector life is extended by say 10%. That will help me calculate the costs vs benefits. What happens when you go below 460? Again, no answer.
Not sure if this might be something along the lines of what you're looking for... starting mostly around page 11.

http://mopar.mopar1973man.com/pdf/022003bosch.pdf
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #36  
IABill's Avatar
IABill
More Turbo
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 12
From: Cumming, Iowa
Aklim, Glad you at least took the time to read it.......

"Let me ask you this. If these snake oils do as much as the manufacturers like to think, why haven't they done a proper test instead of using these "studies" to infer you need their snake oil? After all, if you are selling it, isn't the onus on you to prove efficacy instead of trying to use these "studies" to hint at reasons why the consumer should buy their snake oil?"

What would you consider a proper test for lubricity if the High Frequency Reciprocating Rig test is not a "proper test" to measure lubricity of the tested "snake oils"?

I am not selling anything.

And it appears that the product that provides the best lubricity( REG's Biodiesel) and did not in any way fund this lab test......
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #37  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Rofflecat
Not sure if this might be something along the lines of what you're looking for... starting mostly around page 11.

http://mopar.mopar1973man.com/pdf/022003bosch.pdf
Very interesting. Going to digest some of it later today.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 07:55 AM
  #38  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by IABill
Aklim, Glad you at least took the time to read it.......

"Let me ask you this. If these snake oils do as much as the manufacturers like to think, why haven't they done a proper test instead of using these "studies" to infer you need their snake oil? After all, if you are selling it, isn't the onus on you to prove efficacy instead of trying to use these "studies" to hint at reasons why the consumer should buy their snake oil?"

What would you consider a proper test for lubricity if the High Frequency Reciprocating Rig test is not a "proper test" to measure lubricity of the tested "snake oils"?

I am not selling anything.

And it appears that the product that provides the best lubricity( REG's Biodiesel) and did not in any way fund this lab test......
From my initial reads, the item on the mopar board would be a good test. From an initial glance, it shows that there is a certain amount of increased wear in the pump parts. That shows things much better. Now I know that with say 520 fuel, I am probably losing 15-20% of pump life. Now I can calculate what the pump is worth and what the cost of additive and my time and decide if I want to dump the stuff in it.

Just showing the ball sliding up and down doesn't cut it. With the graph on page 11, you can see how much wear you are willing to put up with.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 08:51 AM
  #39  
Izzy351's Avatar
Izzy351
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,541
Likes: 2
From: Dallas-Ft. Worth
Don't forget to calculate the better burn rate if you use an additive with a cetane bump. I *do* notice about 1 mpg increase while using it. That's enough for me. Well, that, and better power due to the more complete burn.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #40  
USAF CCM's Avatar
USAF CCM
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: New Baden IL
Originally Posted by HKusp
Just so you know, I am NOT one of them. I also am not someone who will beat someone for money. I will do it for free and I doubt they will come away with a warm and fuzzy feeling afterward.
HeHeHe. HKusp, I like your style and the avatar!
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #41  
jjs1988's Avatar
jjs1988
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
this is sorta off yalls topic yall have merged to but i pulled up to a shell station virtually on my last drops yea its bad i know but i wanted to try this so i put 12 oz of that super tech 2 stroke oil in a few shots of dieselkleen and a full tank and literally when pulling out of the parking lot i significantly noticed a quieting when the new fuel hit the bowl i jus thought that was pretty frickin cool haha sorry for interupting
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #42  
snakyjake's Avatar
snakyjake
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Western WA
Originally Posted by WHITE_POWERSTROKE
this information im about to share comes from technicians that i know both ones that work on the heavy duty semi's and light duty desiel pickups. i've been told tranny fluid is an excellent additive for multiple reasons. not only is it a good lubricant it is also a high detergent additive so it keeps your injectors and things of that nature clean. then from there it is also extremely flammable under pressure and has been known to increase the cetane level. i have also heard about the 2 stroke option but i heard from a handful of people that the 2 stroke will clog fuel filters and injectors not 100% sure sounds like you guys are having alot of success with it but here's a thought my buddies at ford run 80% used atf that they have filtered and 20% pump diesel in their trucks they run quieter and get approxametely 1.5 mpg better then on pump alone. just something to think about
I’d like to see more studies on ATF. But at the same time, I don’t have access to a lot of ATF to burn. The reason why 2-stroke oil is so popular is because we can still drive up to any fuel station, and simply add a quart of cheap easily accessible 2-stroke oil.

We’re adding not just any 2-stroke oil, but TW3 2-stroke oil; extra additives and ashless.

As for clogging filters, I can’t imagine that being a problem at the ratio being used, and with using TW3. I don’t think 2-stroke oil will change the fuel viscosity to clog a filter, and there shouldn’t be anything in the oil to clog a filter. I’ve been using 50/50 2-stroke oil in my other gasoline engines, and never had a fuel filter clog.

I'm also careful about some of the fuel stations that say "Up to 5% biodiesel". I'm not sure if it is 0%, 1%, 2%, or 5% being added.

Thanks for your comments,

Jake
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #43  
Franko72's Avatar
Franko72
Molon Labe
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,272
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by superduty4x4
I had been using gray bottle Diesel Kleen every tank for a while, 1 oz per 4 gallons of fuel. It took a while, but I did notice decreased injector noise over time. I recently switched to Supertech (Walmart) 2 stroke oil just for grins and have been using 1 oz per gallon of fuel. My truck has actually got noisier on the 2 stroke slightly (more so when cold), and it may be coincidence but the first big trip with 2 stroke oil in the tank my MPG's were in the crapper big time. I've only ran it for a few tanks, but so far I'm not real impressed and I think I'll switch back to DK once I run out of 2 stroke oil.
I too started adding 1oz of Supertech 2 stroke per gallon of diesel, for the last 3 tanks of fuel. The motor initially got quieter, now it seems to be louder...Its difficult to tell over the #8 injector tick, which also seems louder since I started the 2 stroke diet.
I do like the idea of adding some lube to the fuel system though. I think I'll run straight fuel next fillup and see and hear what happens.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bubba_3711
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
23
Aug 23, 2012 11:28 PM
Native Tex
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
24
Oct 21, 2011 01:07 PM
randomhero1172
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
7
Nov 9, 2007 02:23 PM
sicdefused
Aerostar
2
Mar 30, 2007 05:12 PM
watson
General Diesel Discussion
14
Mar 11, 2007 10:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE