4R70W vs. The E4OD
not speaking from my personal experience,but some have said that in 95 the trucks with mass air had the 4r70w and ones that were SD had the e4od. I know this is the case with my 95,mass air and 4r70w.
The 4R70W is 5.0 only. It was available in 94 and newer. Older trucks got the AOD and may have included the 4.9...although I've only seen the AOD behind a 5.0. The E4OD was behind every engine, 5.0 included. The E4OD is definately a heavier duty tranny. No complaints about my 4R70W though. It's got 331,000+ miles on it, and while it's very tired, it still gets the job done reliably.
I don't believe (automatic) tranny type affected MAF or SD. My 94 5.0/E4OD and 95 5.0/4R70W are both MAF.
I don't believe (automatic) tranny type affected MAF or SD. My 94 5.0/E4OD and 95 5.0/4R70W are both MAF.
I know Broncos had the E4OD and Mass air in 95, in the 5.0
Can't really argue about either.
My Explorer had the 4W70, and it was a good tranny. It was a Limited, so it had the factory tranny cooler. Shifting out of 1st is the only thing that bugged me about the 4W70.
My '97 F350 has the E40D, and it has the factory heavy duty transmission cooler on the front. No complaints. Although I bought the truck well used, it putts along nicely.
My Explorer had the 4W70, and it was a good tranny. It was a Limited, so it had the factory tranny cooler. Shifting out of 1st is the only thing that bugged me about the 4W70.
My '97 F350 has the E40D, and it has the factory heavy duty transmission cooler on the front. No complaints. Although I bought the truck well used, it putts along nicely.
The E4OD is a longer trans than the AOD/AOD-E/4r70W. Then you have to consider the different electrical connections which may or may not be interchangeable between the two, and most probably the flexplate may need changed.
If you were to ask which is easier to rebuild/overhaul by yourself IMHO the 4R70W because it doesnt require all the specialized tools that the E4OD does (even if the E4OD is an O/D C-6), and you can use an AOD transmission rebuild guide for most of the internals except for the valve body.
If you were to ask which is easier to rebuild/overhaul by yourself IMHO the 4R70W because it doesnt require all the specialized tools that the E4OD does (even if the E4OD is an O/D C-6), and you can use an AOD transmission rebuild guide for most of the internals except for the valve body.
Originally Posted by Conanski
All automatic trannys will benefit from a shift kit and some much more than others, these are mass produced components and tolerances vary a lot.
I had my AOD completely rebuilt about 2 years ago behind my warmed over 1985 carbureted 302, and the mechanic I used (10+ year friend of a family member who ONLY builds transmissions, so I trust him) didn't say anything about needing a shift kit. Although he did recommend a tranny cooler, which he did install after the rebuild.
And where does an AOD fit in along with the other transmission options for these trucks, in terms of uniqueness, performance, reliability, etc.?
I have a good friend who works at one of the Ford dealers here in Austin, he told me many years ago that, in order to last, the E4OD/4R100 needs an aftermarket cooler and the AOD/AODE/4R70W needs it's fluid changed real often. My Bronco went 225K on it's original E4OD (and it was still working when I pulled it) and I am now repowering to a 4.6L Triton and 4R70W trans.
Don't kid youself about the strength of the other transmissions either, the E4OD that is installed behind a 302 is nowhere near as strong as one that is bolted up behind a 460. The 460 version gets bigger bands and more clutches and runs higher line pressure than the light duty version so they are not at all equavelent.
My truck is a 94 4x4 with the 302, it has the 4R70W behind it. The guy who had my truck before used it to tow his boat and he said he never had any problems and the truck had good power. I havent towed anything yet since Ive had it so i cant back that up but in the few months Ive had the truck Ive had zero problems with the tranny. It shifts into gear easily, its not sluggish, and it shifts nice and like some other people said its very predictible. Just my review.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
helgaairhead
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
Dec 7, 2017 07:43 PM
MT-F250
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
41
Feb 27, 2013 02:34 PM
CRICKEYDOG
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
8
Feb 4, 2010 12:28 PM










