Notices

Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2002 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
BigJake86's Avatar
BigJake86
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: foot hills
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

Well, I just bought a 429 with a C6 tranny for $250. The engine was partially stuck so I got a break in the price. It is a C9VE block with DOVE-C heads. From what I've read this is a desirable engine. The "9" stands for '69, correct? Anyway, the engine came with high compression pistons with valve recesses in them. The heads will clean up just fine and I'm going to get them ported and polished and add the larger exhaust valve. I'm going to replace the pistons with similar .060 over forged pistons and add new rods. The bottom-end will be bolted together with ARP goods. I've picked out a COMP cam with .540 intake and exhaust lift with 276 and 282 duration, respectively. The intake will be a ported Edelbrock Victor Jr. single-plane with an 850 CFM carb. The exhaust will be small-tube headers flowing through 40 series Flowmasters. The C6 will be rebuilt with a heavy-duty kit from Summit. It'll have a reverse manual valve body and approx. a 3000 rpm stall converter. All this is going in a '67-72 F100 SWB 2wd with 4.10 gears. I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to a high performance engine (seeing as how this will be radical compared to what I'm used to)so, I got Desktop Dyno to aide with my build-up. I know the results are general but it is a starting point. According to DD the hp will hit 532 at 5500rpm. The torque will be 566 at 4500 rpm. Now, this sounds like a real ground-pounder to me. What I'm concerned about is the power out-put: how much is too much? I don't want the tires to smoke every time I try to accelerate, however, I do want the ability to lay rubber when I want to. Any advice on how this truck will perform???-granted the suspension will be upgraded. I know all this is vague but any response would be most appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2002 | 12:51 AM
  #2  
phantom429's Avatar
phantom429
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
From: British Columbia
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

Sounds like a good street truck to me. With that combo you can have fun at the track, cruize in traffic, and have fun at the rod runs. The cam is pretty big, bordering on race, but still very streetable. Plan on running premium pump gas, and upgrade fuel supply.

You will get used to the truck. At first it may scare you but over time you can drive it like grandpa or Andretti depending on the situation. Pickups can be a tad light on the rear end, but reloacating the battery to the bed, adding a good posi, traction bars and big fat sticky tires should keep things in check.

Nick from the frozen north
1974 F-250 4X4
soon to be 429
dana 60 front and rear

 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2002 | 02:17 AM
  #3  
redranger1's Avatar
redranger1
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
From: Iberia, USA
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

that does indeed sound pretty mean. somethin you may want to reconsider would be the converter stall. id think about bringin it back down to 1200-1400 rpm. that would help the possible problem of tires spinning out everytime ya take off also.


-nathan
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2002 | 04:03 AM
  #4  
Quantrex's Avatar
Quantrex
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

You might want to take a look at TCI's roller bearing package for the C6 and their 2.74:1 planetary gear set. The bearings will reduce friction (heat) in the tranny and the lower first gear will make those 4.10's feel like 4.58's.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2002 | 06:54 AM
  #5  
DeenHylton's Avatar
DeenHylton
Elder User
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 966
Likes: 2
From: Crooked River Ranch, OR
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

>Well, I just bought a 429 with a C6 tranny for $250. The
>engine was partially stuck so I got a break in the price. It
>is a C9VE block with DOVE-C heads. From what I've read this
>is a desirable engine. The "9" stands for '69, correct?
>Anyway, the engine came with high compression pistons with
>valve recesses in them. The heads will clean up just fine
>and I'm going to get them ported and polished and add the
>larger exhaust valve. I'm going to replace the pistons with
>similar .060 over forged pistons and add new rods. The
>bottom-end will be bolted together with ARP goods. I've
>picked out a COMP cam with .540 intake and exhaust lift with
>276 and 282 duration, respectively. The intake will be a
>ported Edelbrock Victor Jr. single-plane with an 850 CFM
>carb. The exhaust will be small-tube headers flowing through
>40 series Flowmasters. The C6 will be rebuilt with a
>heavy-duty kit from Summit. It'll have a reverse manual
>valve body and approx. a 3000 rpm stall converter. All this
>is going in a '67-72 F100 SWB 2wd with 4.10 gears. I'm
>pretty ignorant when it comes to a high performance engine
>(seeing as how this will be radical compared to what I'm
>used to)so, I got Desktop Dyno to aide with my build-up. I
>know the results are general but it is a starting point.
>According to DD the hp will hit 532 at 5500rpm. The torque
>will be 566 at 4500 rpm. Now, this sounds like a real
>ground-pounder to me. What I'm concerned about is the power
>out-put: how much is too much? I don't want the tires to
>smoke every time I try to accelerate, however, I do want the
>ability to lay rubber when I want to. Any advice on how this
>truck will perform???-granted the suspension will be
>upgraded. I know all this is vague but any response would be
>most appreciated.

What are the cam specs at .050 lift? If 276 and 282 are being measured at .050 that cam will be way too much radical for any street use. Lookin at your stall converter you'll want to choose one that flashes to about 500 RPM less than your maximum torque reading for best launch. Another thing is that Victor Jr. intake...they are great for a stick car/truck but kill the much needed torque for auto equipped vehicles. You'd be much better off running a dual plane, they make more torque and are good for 6500 RPM. Your 4.11's are adequate as long as you keep your tire diameter under 32" tall...if you go above that then I'd be looking for 4.56's. Deen
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2002 | 08:29 AM
  #6  
airharley's Avatar
airharley
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,351
Likes: 1
From: Escondido, CA
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

I have to agree with Dean on the intake manifold. If you run a Wieand Stealth dual plane intake you actually have more TQ at a lower rpm. plus you will see a differance of maybe 25-30 TQ and HP. The lower your TQ comes in the better for trucks. Here is another way to ensure you have plenty of weight to keep those tires planted. You can take an old gas tank with a drain plug and place it between the frame rails. Fill it up with water and you have instant weight. Once you are done farting around doing wheelies drain the tank and you are back to normal. I have to replace my bed floor so I am going with 1/8 diamond plate steel. That will give me enough weight to hold it plus I can say it will be a whole bunch of years before the bed rots out again. Also don't forget to add a rear sway bar. Less then $200 from summit. Just my two cents.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2002 | 11:21 AM
  #7  
BigJake86's Avatar
BigJake86
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: foot hills
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

That's great advice from all of you! I wasn't all that sure about the torque converter, but I'll probably go with the suggestions. I'll probably change to the Weiand intake also. The gas tank weight idea is pretty cool, too. Thanks again. Those specs for the cam are seat- to-seat measurements.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2002 | 03:41 PM
  #8  
TryMe's Avatar
TryMe
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Overly ambitious, or no? (long)

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
william16339
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
1
Sep 12, 2016 09:10 PM
dying breed racing
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
1
May 1, 2015 08:25 AM
Jayman1976
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
Jul 26, 2013 06:41 PM
1TUFFBRONCO
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
15
Jun 11, 2004 09:16 AM
71LTD390
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
3
Mar 7, 2004 05:36 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE