View Poll Results: Would you like a tech article on how to re-wire your factory harness to MAF?
Yes, I would



496
95.02%
No thanks



4
0.77%
I duno, I might...



22
4.21%
Voters: 522. You may not vote on this poll
SD to MAF Conversion - Write up?
yes i know i can't believe the lack of support (badly needed support) for this issue. hell holley will sell you any damn kit imaginable to shave half-second off a stupid chevy 350, but they see no need for a simple plug-and-play tbi or simplified mass-air getup for us speed density/batch fire guys? i guess millions of f-series/bronco's sold since '86 isn't enough. makes me sick. i just wanna rip the whole damn powertrain out of my 92 bronco not even bother removing the bolts first. go with an early windsor/c4/208 or something and screw the emissions. my '66 f150 has a plain-jane 351w (1973) and an e4od (1984) and it runs so much better (and i mean way better) than the efi's. no wonder toyota is gaining so hard, i'm sure others must be sick-and-tired as me. where's the damn tylenol
Converting to mass air isn't really that difficult and it doesn't require a $1500 kit either. For those that want to put in a little effort, all the necessary parts can be sourced (new or junkyard) from f-series.
You need an injector harness - buy or make.
You need an EEC that fits your engine/tranny combo
You need a MAF and associated wiring - buy or make the wiring.
If you want to open yourself to the better aftermarket support, specifically with tuning software (or devices) do some extra wiring and convert your SD truck to the 89-93 Mustang mass air EEC system - again, it's not very difficult.
And there are other, more complicated/interesting choices. If you can read schematics and have fair to good wiring skills, you can convert your truck to other brands of EFI as well. Parts are parts. Just requires a bit more research. I helped a friend convert his 80-something Bronco to run corvette EFI, using coil-near-plug. It works really, really well. Even better than the newish Ford EDIS. I've done EDIS conversions for older engines as well.
I don't get why so many people have such driveability problems with Ford SD systems. When things aren't quite right you troubleshoot the problem and fix it. Just like any other problem a vehicle might have.
When you hear clunking don't you look for bad u-joints? When you hear scraping when stopping don't you inspect the brakes?
When you truck stumbles you look at sensors, vaccum, etc. Instead of using a large wrench you use a voltmeter.
You need an injector harness - buy or make.
You need an EEC that fits your engine/tranny combo
You need a MAF and associated wiring - buy or make the wiring.
If you want to open yourself to the better aftermarket support, specifically with tuning software (or devices) do some extra wiring and convert your SD truck to the 89-93 Mustang mass air EEC system - again, it's not very difficult.
And there are other, more complicated/interesting choices. If you can read schematics and have fair to good wiring skills, you can convert your truck to other brands of EFI as well. Parts are parts. Just requires a bit more research. I helped a friend convert his 80-something Bronco to run corvette EFI, using coil-near-plug. It works really, really well. Even better than the newish Ford EDIS. I've done EDIS conversions for older engines as well.
I don't get why so many people have such driveability problems with Ford SD systems. When things aren't quite right you troubleshoot the problem and fix it. Just like any other problem a vehicle might have.
When you hear clunking don't you look for bad u-joints? When you hear scraping when stopping don't you inspect the brakes?
When you truck stumbles you look at sensors, vaccum, etc. Instead of using a large wrench you use a voltmeter.
The only thing that has been deterring me is the fact there isn't a plug and play harness available anymore. I've never been into electrical that much and changing wires around kinda worries me.
Just chiming in, mind you...
I've been restricted from my Junk-yarding by the boss, er... wife till a few home projects are completed so I haven't been able to nail the harness's I wanted to play with. I'm capable of doing the rewire down to the pin level since I used to work on the same style control harnesses with a lot more pins than an EEK 4 or 5. I've been considering cutting down a 96 5.8/E4 harness that I have access to & putting an EEK 4 connector on the PCM end so I can use a matched set of 96/5.8 injectors with the 76mm meter I have without adaptors. Any thoughts?
While I'm waiting perhaps someone with a greater knowledge base than I, (Frederic, Bill K ?) could elaborate on E4OD controls & theory of operation & the differrences between years. For instance that extra wire that EEC5-E4ODs use over the earlier models that are EEC4s.
And by the by... Has anyone here bought anything lately from fordfuelinjection.com/RMJ?
I've been restricted from my Junk-yarding by the boss, er... wife till a few home projects are completed so I haven't been able to nail the harness's I wanted to play with. I'm capable of doing the rewire down to the pin level since I used to work on the same style control harnesses with a lot more pins than an EEK 4 or 5. I've been considering cutting down a 96 5.8/E4 harness that I have access to & putting an EEK 4 connector on the PCM end so I can use a matched set of 96/5.8 injectors with the 76mm meter I have without adaptors. Any thoughts?
While I'm waiting perhaps someone with a greater knowledge base than I, (Frederic, Bill K ?) could elaborate on E4OD controls & theory of operation & the differrences between years. For instance that extra wire that EEC5-E4ODs use over the earlier models that are EEC4s.
And by the by... Has anyone here bought anything lately from fordfuelinjection.com/RMJ?
Originally Posted by monkei
I think I'm going to bite the bullet and throw down another 250 for a superlift truspeed speedo calibrator (lifted, gears...) for a 94 rather than the one i have for a 92 but I don't think thats gonna solve the issue.
.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/article/...ND_BRONCO.html
Cheers
Mike
Originally Posted by frederic
I don't get why so many people have such driveability problems with Ford SD systems. When things aren't quite right you troubleshoot the problem and fix it. Just like any other problem a vehicle might have.
When you hear clunking don't you look for bad u-joints? When you hear scraping when stopping don't you inspect the brakes?
When you truck stumbles you look at sensors, vaccum, etc. Instead of using a large wrench you use a voltmeter.
When you hear clunking don't you look for bad u-joints? When you hear scraping when stopping don't you inspect the brakes?
When you truck stumbles you look at sensors, vaccum, etc. Instead of using a large wrench you use a voltmeter.
Yes. Yes.
Yes.
But, whats that got to do with converting to a mass air flow system???
Please don't post off topic like that.
Last edited by eco; Nov 24, 2007 at 04:20 PM.
Originally Posted by eco
But, whats that got to do with converting to a mass air flow system???
Please don't post off topic like that.
Please don't post off topic like that.
..... Frederic's credentials as far as helping & creativeness are without compare.
Frederic, you make it sound so easy.
But I can tell you from experience that it isnt just a matter of going to the junkyard, grabbing stuff from the right vehicle and making it work.
I only knew what to do with swapping injector wires because of the forums, and i still haven't been able to get much more info on the trans harnes connector differences between in a 92 and 94 e40d. I'm trying to determine what the four discrepant pinouts are for (sensors, solenoids, etc) and what the extra wire is for on the 94 trannys.
found this comment interesting:"perhaps someone with a greater knowledge base than I could elaborate on E4OD controls & theory of operation & the differrences between years. For instance that extra wire that EEC5-E4ODs use over the earlier models that are EEC4s"
I thought only the 106 pin ecu were the eec-Vs and were only on 96's??
I took all my donor parts (computer, TFI, harness, dist) from a CA emissions 94 5.0 bronco with the e40d. I was pretty sure it was eec-iv, the computer and harness connection looks identical to my old. Notable differences were the MAF system extras, lack of MAP, auto locking hubs and 4wabs. My truck is a 92 e40d 5.0 Bronco from AZ and apparently in those 2 years enough changed in the tranny controls routing that it seems like the tranny is running in a failure mode strategy.
Mr. M, does that PSOM reprogram work for tires and gears like other calibrators?
But I can tell you from experience that it isnt just a matter of going to the junkyard, grabbing stuff from the right vehicle and making it work.
I only knew what to do with swapping injector wires because of the forums, and i still haven't been able to get much more info on the trans harnes connector differences between in a 92 and 94 e40d. I'm trying to determine what the four discrepant pinouts are for (sensors, solenoids, etc) and what the extra wire is for on the 94 trannys.
found this comment interesting:"perhaps someone with a greater knowledge base than I could elaborate on E4OD controls & theory of operation & the differrences between years. For instance that extra wire that EEC5-E4ODs use over the earlier models that are EEC4s"
I thought only the 106 pin ecu were the eec-Vs and were only on 96's??
I took all my donor parts (computer, TFI, harness, dist) from a CA emissions 94 5.0 bronco with the e40d. I was pretty sure it was eec-iv, the computer and harness connection looks identical to my old. Notable differences were the MAF system extras, lack of MAP, auto locking hubs and 4wabs. My truck is a 92 e40d 5.0 Bronco from AZ and apparently in those 2 years enough changed in the tranny controls routing that it seems like the tranny is running in a failure mode strategy.
Mr. M, does that PSOM reprogram work for tires and gears like other calibrators?
Originally Posted by andym
FTE has moderators that deal with people who derail topics. You do your job & they'll do theirs.
You could at least be more specific as to who you are talking to when you say "YOU" or quote someone so that the readers of your post will know what the heck you are talking about.
Originally Posted by eco
True....but why the comment?
You could at least be more specific as to who you are talking to when you say "YOU" or quote someone so that the readers of your post will know what the heck you are talking about.
You could at least be more specific as to who you are talking to when you say "YOU" or quote someone so that the readers of your post will know what the heck you are talking about.
Originally Posted by andym
I thought it was clear... I was talking to you.
So, let me get this strait as I still do not understand 100% what you are trying to get across, but I think I have an idea. Are you saying that I should not comment on frederic's blatent off topic posting because there are moderators to regulate these kinds of things?
c'mon clown let's not start. i envy frederic's brain. i wish'd i had it. right now monkei's questions are rivetting. i hope he gets some satisfaction here cause i also have a 92 5.0/e4od/borg warner and a motorsport mass-air conversion still in the box waiting to go on as soon as i figure how to hook up the tranny. i wondered if the stock computer (to shift the e4od) can run side by side with the motorsport computer to run the engine.
Originally Posted by eco
trying to get across, but I think I have an idea. Are you saying that I should not comment on frederic's blatent off topic posting because there are moderators to regulate these kinds of things?
You've personally ruined more threads with your typical 5-10 "off-topic" rants about other people, so before you ruin more threads why don't you set an example with your own behavior before calling the kettle black.
Now onto Monkei's comments.
Originally Posted by monkei
Frederic, you make it sound so easy.
Originally Posted by monkei
But I can tell you from experience that it isnt just a matter of going to the junkyard, grabbing stuff from the right vehicle and making it work.
Then you have to rewiring the injector harness, replacing it with a junkyard one or making a new one is easiest - and move a few pins around on the EEC connector to get all eight injectors correct.
Add a MAF and the corresponding wiring for that, and then disconnect the hose from the MAP sensor to the vacuum tree on your intake and leave it "floating" so it can measure ambient pressure instead of intake pressure.
Originally Posted by monkei
I only knew what to do with swapping injector wires because of the forums, and i still haven't been able to get much more info on the trans harnes connector differences between in a 92 and 94 e40d. I'm trying to determine what the four discrepant pinouts are for (sensors, solenoids, etc) and what the extra wire is for on the 94 trannys.
So I can't answer your question specifically but what I can offer as a consolation prize is the wiring functions, pins, and color codes for the 94 E40D right from the book. I did notice that these seemed to change slightly from year to year. Maybe this list will help you out somehow?
94 F-series E40D
11 - wht/yel - Pressure Control Solenoid
12 - wht/red - Pressure Control Solenoid
1 - red - power from EEC Relay
2 - org/yel - #1 shift solenoid
3 - ppl/org - #2 shift solenoid
4 - ppl/yel - torque converter clutch solenoid
5 - brn/org - coast clutch solenoid
7 - org/blk - trans oil temp sensor (pin #49, TFI, on powertrain control module)
8 - gry/red - trans oil temp sensor (sensor/signal ground at EEC)
Originally Posted by monkei
found this comment interesting:"perhaps someone with a greater knowledge base than I could elaborate on E4OD controls & theory of operation & the differrences between years. For instance that extra wire that EEC5-E4ODs use over the earlier models that are EEC4s"
Originally Posted by monkei
I thought only the 106 pin ecu were the eec-Vs and were only on 96's??
Originally Posted by monkei
I took all my donor parts (computer, TFI, harness, dist) from a CA emissions 94 5.0 bronco with the e40d. I was pretty sure it was eec-iv, the computer and harness connection looks identical to my old. Notable










