Notices
General NON-Automotive Conversation No Political, Sexual or Religious topics please.

Physics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #151  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by BrianA
Thanks for the offer, but I'll return the favor (offering to help)

It won't fly.

If it WOULD take off under the circumstances desribed, then there have been HUGE blunders made over the years. Those large, heavy drag inducing appendages on aircraft known as "wings" are, in fact, NOT NEEDED.

Lift is generated by THRUST, not Bernouli's principle.

NOT!!

There is no lift (no vector perpendicular to the force of gravity) - there is no flight.



As I think about this now, I do NOT believe that anybody really believes the plane would fly.

I DO believe folks post acting like they believe it just to hassle guys like me and keep an amusing thread going.

And some folks will reply to this post saying they absolutely DO believe the plane would fly, all the while laughing, knowing full well it would never leave the ground.
Also knowing guys will continue to repsond to try and convince them it really would NOT fly.



That's what I think.
You really don't understand that the wheels have almost nothing to do with the jets movement do you?
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #152  
EnviroCon's Avatar
EnviroCon
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by sigma
nope...

I just browse through the other board and all I can say is "Incredible!"
It did seem awfully familiar though didn't it?!
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #153  
sigma's Avatar
sigma
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
The only difference is they have been at it since July and have had time come up with some really inventive reasons on both sides of the debate.

I particularly enjoyed the example where the tires burst into flames as everything spun up toward infinity while remaining stationary.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #154  
BrianA's Avatar
BrianA
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,532
Likes: 5
From: Trussville, Alabama
Originally Posted by OSin86
You really don't understand that the wheels have almost nothing to do with the jets movement do you?
Actually I DO believe the wheels have a lot to do with a jets movement.
Matter of fact, I believe you could modify the undercarriage and add numerous tires, way more than is need to simply suppor the weight of the airplane.
Eventually you could get enough tires that you would no longer need jet engines.
We have already seen (above) you don't need wings for the plane to fly. Add enough wheels and put that bird on a big ole' tread mill, and you don't need jet engines either.

You could have a bunch of flying, wingless, no engine "sausages"

You guys have fun. I'm out of this one now
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #155  
EnviroCon's Avatar
EnviroCon
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by sigma
The only difference is they have been at it since July and have had time come up with some really inventive reasons on both sides of the debate.

I particularly enjoyed the example where the tires burst into flames as everything spun up toward infinity while remaining stationary.
I didn't read that one. I did watch the video where the kid used a skateboard with a fan on it, put the skateboard on a long piece of paper, and then pulled the paper in the opposite direction as the fan pushed the skateboard forward. That was a pretty good demonstration of what was being talked about. Still though, without an actual 747 on a conveyor, I don't think some people will ever be convinced it will fly. If I can find the time I'm going to go back and try to read more of that board.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #156  
Sam_Fear's Avatar
Sam_Fear
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, IA
Originally Posted by sigma
The only difference is they have been at it since July and have had time come up with some really inventive reasons on both sides of the debate.

I particularly enjoyed the example where the tires burst into flames as everything spun up toward infinity while remaining stationary.
I came up with that scenrio also, but the wheels could be turning at infinity instantaniously - not possible.

Then I re-read the question. THE CONVEYOR DOES NOT COUNTER FORCES APPLIED TO THE PLANE, IT ONLY MATCHES -VELOCITY.

The plane must move for the conveyor to move (relative to the ground). It simply states the conveyor will move in the opposite direction of the plane at the same speed. It does not say it will counter the forces applied to the plane. A measurement of the wheels speed (distance traveled on the conveyor by the wheel) will be twice that of the wing speed (measured relative to the ground). The plane would still take off.

I CAN'T BELIEVE I REPLIED TO THIS!
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #157  
76supercab2's Avatar
76supercab2
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by BrianA
Thanks for the offer, but I'll return the favor (offering to help)

It won't fly.

If it WOULD take off under the circumstances desribed, then there have been HUGE blunders made over the years. Those large, heavy drag inducing appendages on aircraft known as "wings" are, in fact, NOT NEEDED.

Lift is generated by THRUST, not Bernouli's principle.

NOT!!

There is no lift (no vector perpendicular to the force of gravity) - there is no flight.



As I think about this now, I do NOT believe that anybody really believes the plane would fly.

I DO believe folks post acting like they believe it just to hassle guys like me and keep an amusing thread going.

And some folks will reply to this post saying they absolutely DO believe the plane would fly, all the while laughing, knowing full well it would never leave the ground.
Also knowing guys will continue to repsond to try and convince them it really would NOT fly.



That's what I think.
You are putting words in my mouth. I never said there would be no airflow across the wings. In fact I've said just the opposite. If the vector of the belt is negated by the wheels (it is) and the only vector left is the thrust of the engines, then the plane will accelerate, air will flow across the wing, lift will be generated and the plane will take off.

Have you seen this:

http://videos.streetfire.net/player....D-D6BA1A43A06B

The paper 'conveyor' is unable to stop the skateboard because of the thrust of the fan. The skateboard can achieve forward velocity. With a stronger fan (lets face it, home fans aren't designed to create a lot of thrust) it will accellerate more. With forward motion, if it had wings there would be lift and if it was a plane, it would fly.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:08 PM
  #158  
BrianA's Avatar
BrianA
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,532
Likes: 5
From: Trussville, Alabama
Ah heck, I can't stay out of it....

Go back and read the original premise.
As defined therein:
The conveyor is set so that it negates all forward motion imparted by the thrust of the engines.
The harder the engines work to push the plane forward, the faster the conveyor runs so that plane never moves forward.
In a fixed frame of reference, by definition in this situation, the airplane's velocity RELATIVE TO THE AMBIENT AIR (and the surrounding ground), remains zero mph.
The foward thrust of the engines does NOT generate any lift, the thrust only serves to push the airfoils (wings) through the air.

The airfoil moving through the air generates the lift.

So, if you believe the plane will lift off, then you have to explain :

How can the airfoil generate lift when there is no air flowing over the airfoil?

I love a good argument, but this ain't even a good argument.

You can have 750 conveyor belts and various contraptions arranged in whatever fashion you desire; they mean NOTHING.
What matters is air moving over the air foil.

Good grief, I can't believe this is even being discussed.

I still do NOT believe ANYBODY really believes the plane would ever leave the ground with no air flowing over the wing.



edit to add:
Forget the "conveyor belt" being set so that the plane never moves forward. Chain the freakin' thing to a big monster anchor so that the plane can't move forward. Rev those engines wide open.
You think it's gonna' fly?
 

Last edited by BrianA; Dec 15, 2005 at 04:18 PM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #159  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
Brian, you are the one who is acting the part of a troll. My bet is that you're the one laughing in his chair watching the rest of us fools try and convince you what a 16 year high school student can figure out.

EVERYONE's knee-jerk reaction is that the plane won't fly. Then you spend more than 10 seconds thinking about it, and realize it will.

You're not keeping an open mind. You're not open to the possibility that it will. You start reading a post, and as soon as you get to the part that says it will fly, you write the post and the author off. Not a very smart approach.

And your attitude here as a moderator doesn't exactly set a good example for the rest of the community.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #160  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by BrianA
Ah heck, I can't stay out of it....

Go back and read the original premise.
As defined therein:
The conveyor is set so that it negates all forward motion imparted by the thrust of the engines.
Where does it say that? It never said forward movement would be negated, it just said the belt will match the speed of the jet in the reverse direction

Originally Posted by BrianA
edit to add:
Forget the "conveyor belt" being set so that the plane never moves forward. Chain the freakin' thing to a big monster anchor so that the plane can't move forward. Rev those engines wide open.
You think it's gonna' fly?
That's exactly it, there is no anchor, the jet will take off like normal.

LMAO, I really think I'm falling for your game here now. Let's pretend we don't know the answer and watch others
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #161  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
Originally Posted by BrianA
The airfoil moving through the air generates the lift.

So, if you believe the plane will lift off, then you have to explain :

How can the airfoil generate lift when there is no air flowing over the airfoil?

I love a good argument, but this ain't even a good argument.

You can have 750 conveyor belts and various contraptions arranged in whatever fashion you desire; they mean NOTHING.
What matters is air moving over the air foil.

Good grief, I can't believe this is even being discussed.

I still do NOT believe ANYBODY really believes the plane would ever leave the ground with no air flowing over the wing.
Read my last post, and then read the following carefully:

NO ONE is saying the plane will fly without air flow over the wings. We ALL know air needs to be flowing in order for the plane to fly. Stop condescending to us.

The plane will fly because it will roll down the runway. Assuming the conveyor belt is long enough for the plane to take off, you can bet $100 it will fly.

This is why:

are you ready?

The wheels are FREELY SPINNING. They have NO power to stop the plane from rolling forward. NONE. It does not matter what direction the wheels are spinning. They do NOT DRIVE THE PLANE. The engines do.

Sheesh.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #162  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
Let me explain it another way.

Take a matchbox car and put it on a small conveyor belt. Hold it still with your hand. The wheels will spin backwards. Now, with a flick of your wrist, push the car forward. Does it go forward? Of course it does. Because you are applying force to the body of the car, just like a jet engine does. The wheels will just spin faster in the opposite direction. If you were to keep applying force, the car would accelerate. If it had wings, it would take off.

The wheels are not pushing the car. Your hand is.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #163  
EnviroCon's Avatar
EnviroCon
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by andym
. . . My bet is that you're the one laughing in his chair watching the rest of us fools try and convince you . . .
You know, you may just be on to something, hummm! Are we being played?! . . .
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #164  
alchymist's Avatar
alchymist
"Mifflin Clay"
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,177
Likes: 4
From: Mifflin, PA
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by EnviroCon
You know, you may just be on to something, hummm! Are we being played?! . . .
Like a violin .........!
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #165  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
I just can't believe an FTE moderator would pull that kind of stunt.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE