They give you that 200,000k mile warranty so you can buy the crap....that's just marketing stragety and how they really want to get rid of them trucks. besides....who want a durajunk anyways. nobody around here

 

The sad thing is, I drive with my running lights on all the time with my Ford Ranger, I did the same thing with my 2002 and 2003 Sport Trac's, and NEVER had one bulb burn out. That is after 20-30k miles on each vehicle. (Flawless miles I might add, unlike my uncle's S-10 that left him stranded and was in the shop several times within his first year of ownership) I like to drive with them on because here around Michigan people CANNOT drive, and almost all of them have cellphones to their ear, so if I can prevent someone from hitting me because they notice the lights (yellow grabs attention better than white), it will prevent a lot of trouble. So basically I drive my truck like Chevy/GM makes their customers drive, and I do not have these burn out problems.

Ford to the rescue once again!

Oh and I notice the problem on all years, I have seen 2000-2004's. Our neighbor has a 2003 Suburban, it has had more electrical issues than any vehicle I have heard of. They replace the front running lights semi-annually. That is unacceptable in my opinion.

 

F-Deuce50 I now consider you a troll, you only have negative things to say about other brands. The "durajunk" is far more reliable than the 6.0 and it is a great engine.
BTW: If you think about it(I know thats hard for you, but try) chevy would make more money with a shorter warranty so obviously they care about the consumer. Actually I dont know why Chevy has warranties, they never have any problems J/k

 

There is no manufaturer that cares about the consumer, all they care about is money. And I rather be a troll then be caught driveing a duracrap.

 

How is the Duramax crap? I've yet to read anything other than brand-bias opinion from you and no facts. Your reasoning is "Fords the best, chevy sucks"

 

1. Chevys cost more than Fords,
2. Fords can tow more
3. The majority of heavy duty work trucks are Ford for a reason.

There's a few, but I can go on if you wish.

 

I was once a chevy guy but i'm now all FORD. So take your crappy ideas somewhere else. Got rid of the Nova as well. Wouldn't want to have both Chevy and FORD. My opinions are not negative. I've have nothing but negative expierences with CHEVY......i got chevies cuz people had so much hype. Nothing to brag about. FORD is better. PERIOD. IF i'm a troll that makes you a p.o.s

 

i got smoked my mustangs in my camaro........disappointing....just not grunt....my 68 cougar 302 is a way better. B.T.W. the camaro had a 327. How about that, getting smoked by 5.0s.

 

hey, why you getting mad a me F-deuce. I am on you side. I have the Nova because it is lighter than any of the other muscle cars, and you can throw pretty much anthing you want in the big engine bay. Not to bash the Mustangs , but I really dont like the early years for them, just not my style.

 

not you bro....Hammy Tammy over there

 

mustang not my style...That's why I went with the '68 cougar....love those hideway lights...not to mention stock disc brake

 

Cool, I didn't know hammy had a nova too. Makes me want to sell mine now.

 

Thats funny that I stubbled on to this thread because my helper was saying the samething today we saw 4 of them on one road like that.

 

4 of what sglaine

 

What ideas of mine are "crappy". Just because youve had a few bad experiences with chevy doesnt mean they suck. Ive had a few bad experiences with Ford but I dont think they suck. Ive had 3 chevys and they all served me well. And please keep the immature namecalling to a minimum from now on(it just keeps on degrading my view of you).