Oil Rating
Rotella T SAE 15W 40
CI-4, Yes
Antifoaming Additive, Yes(1)
Ford/International Recommended, Yes
Rotella T SAE 10W 30
CI-4, Yes
Antifoaming Additive, Yes(2)
Ford/International Recommended, Yes
Rotella T Synthetic SAE 5W 40
CI-4, Yes
Antifoaming Additive, Yes(1)
Ford/International Recommended, Yes
Rotella T SAE 10W
CI-4, No(3)
Antifoaming Additive, ?
Ford/International Recommended, No
Rotella T SAE 20W
CI-4, No(3)
Antifoaming Additive, ?
Ford/International Recommended, No
Rotella T SAE 30W
CI-4, No(3)
Antifoaming Additive, ?
Ford/International Recommended, No
Rotella T SAE 40W
CI-4, No(3)
Antifoaming Additive, ?
Ford/International Recommended, No
Rotella T SAE 50W
CI-4, No(3)
Antifoaming Additive, ?
Ford/International Recommended, No
Rotella T Synth Blend 10W 40
CI-4, No(4)
Antifoaming Additive, Yes(5)
Ford/International Recommended, Yes
Rotella T Synth Blend 10W 30
CI-4, No(4)
Antifoaming Additive, Yes(5)
Ford/International Recommended, Yes
Rotella T Synth Blend 0W 30
CI-4, No
Antifoaming Additive, ?
Ford/International Recommended, No
(1) This is the email I received from Shell:
John -
Thanks for the opportunity to respond to your inquiry, and thanks for
using Shell Lubricants.
Both ROTELLA T SAE 15W-40 and ROTELLA T Synthetic SAE 5W-40 contain
antifoam additives.
Peter Van Benthuysen
(2) I'm assuming that this oil has the same antifoaming additives since it also carries the CI-4 rating and is recommended for use in Ford/International engines. It wasn't addressed in the email from the Shell representative.
(3) Farm equipment, stationary diesel engines, Detroit Diesel 2-cycle engines, transmissions, hydraulic systems, or any specification calling for the CF-4, CF-2, or any other obsolete C rating.
(4) This seems like it hasn't been updated yet since this should be a blend of the regular and synthetic oils approved under the API rating CI-4.
(5) The 10W 40 and 10W 30 synthetic blends have the CH-4 rating. These oils probably (not confirmed) have antifoaming additives since they are designed for use in engines calling for the CH-4 rating, which requires antifoaming additives.
Last edited by johnsdiesel; May 6, 2004 at 03:04 PM.
J/k Tim !!!!
(you've GOT to stop leaving the door open like that !)
I learned after Bob got me about the 10th time - yes slow learner _ short bus - go ahead Bob !!!!)
O-sure you just think you know me..........cause you met my type in the city
Door open.....huh......who me
Slow learner I are
J/k Tim !!!!
(you've GOT to stop leaving the door open like that !)
I learned after Bob got me about the 10th time - yes slow learner _ short bus - go ahead Bob !!!!)
The CH-4 oil met API CH-4 and Cummins 20071 & 20076 approvals where as the new oil meets earlier specs plus API CI-4 & Cummins 20078 approvals.
As far as physical properties go, I will provide only the ones that changed. The older CH-4 oil had a viscosity of 88.8 cSt @ 40ºC vs. 90 cSt of the CI-4. The neutralization No. TBN-E is 10 for the older CH-4 oil vs. 11.5 for the CI-4 oil. Sufated ash content % by weight for the CH-4 oil is 1.3 vs. 1.47 for the CI-4 oil.
The differences look very minor and I don't know how they could affect overall performance and wear, but just wanted to show the difference. I also wanted to inform others that there still is some CH-4 rated Shell Rotella T Synthetic 5W40 on the store shelves. I don't have anything against the Shell oil, but was just trying to find a CI-4 rated oil. It looks as if the new formulation of the Rotella T Synthetic meets this approval, now I just have to find it.
Here is also a link about Castrol oil which helps explain the need for additives in the newer CI-4 oils due to the EGR system ---- http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m.../article.jhtml
Thanks a lot for the work and research that you both shared with us. I am now much better informed. At least I have a choice. Neither oil is widely stocked so there may be times when we have to switch which because they are so similar will be O.K.
Thanks again.
Thanks a lot for the work and research that you both shared with us. I am now much better informed. At least I have a choice. Neither oil is widely stocked so there may be times when we have to switch which because they are so similar will be O.K.
Thanks again.
Thanks a lot for the work and research that you both shared with us. I am now much better informed. At least I have a choice. Neither oil is widely stocked so there may be times when we have to switch which because they are so similar will be O.K.
Thanks again.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Had Blackstone Lab analysis done and here is what they said about my oil (and all 6.0L motors i general). This motor is breaking down oil to that of a 30 weight. Would hate to start with 30 weight and end up with something close to 20 weight which will ruin your motor!!!.
Here is Blackstone's comments...
JEFF: The viscosity in this sample did improve a little over your last sample, although it is still slightly low for a 15W/40 oil. We have been finding that the 6.0L Power Stroke is notorious for shearing down the oil's viscosity. Most of the samples we see from these engines have a lower viscosity, regardless of the brand of oil. We don't think your viscosity is a problem at all, as it is reading in a 30W range. No fuel, coolant, or water contamination was found, and insolubles were low, showing good oil filtration. This looks like a very nice wearing engine at 22,100 miles.
Thanks,
Jeff





