Oil Rating
Regards,
Morris
Last edited by mobandy; May 1, 2004 at 10:55 AM.
API Service CI-4—For 2004 Severe Duty Diesel Engine Service
API Service Category CI-4 describes oils for use in high-speed, four-stroke cycle diesel engines designed to meet 2004 exhaust emission standards implemented in 2002. These oils are intended for use in all applications with diesel fuels ranging in sulfur content up to 0.5% weight.
These oils are specifically formulated to sustain engine durability where Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) is used and the impact of these oils on other supplemental exhaust emission devices has not been determined. Optimum protection is provided against corrosive and soot-related wear tendencies, piston deposits, degradation of low- and high-temperature viscometric properties due to soot accumulation, oxidative thickening, loss of oil consumption control, foaming, degradation of seal materials, and viscosity loss due to shear.
API CI-4 oils are superior in performance to those meeting API CH-4, CG-4 and CF-4 and may be used in engines calling for those API Service Categories.
The first license date for API CI-4 will be September 5, 2002.
Ryan
2. Much quieter engine, especially at cold start.(I think superioir injector lubrication)
3. Reduced oil pressure at cold operating temps stopped my rear main leak. I installed an Auto meter gage so I know this to be true.
4. Extended engine life. Better lubrication means less wear. There have been many tests over the years so this is generally accepted.
There are others. We have some real oil experts on this forum. If we can refrain from getting into a "which brand is best" argument, most will agree that any synthetic is better than the same brand regular oil.
API Service CI-4—For 2004 Severe Duty Diesel Engine Service
API Service Category CI-4 describes oils for use in high-speed, four-stroke cycle diesel engines designed to meet 2004 exhaust emission standards implemented in 2002. These oils are intended for use in all applications with diesel fuels ranging in sulfur content up to 0.5% weight.
These oils are specifically formulated to sustain engine durability where Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) is used and the impact of these oils on other supplemental exhaust emission devices has not been determined. Optimum protection is provided against corrosive and soot-related wear tendencies, piston deposits, degradation of low- and high-temperature viscometric properties due to soot accumulation, oxidative thickening, loss of oil consumption control, foaming, degradation of seal materials, and viscosity loss due to shear.
API CI-4 oils are superior in performance to those meeting API CH-4, CG-4 and CF-4 and may be used in engines calling for those API Service Categories.
The first license date for API CI-4 will be September 5, 2002.
Ryan
I know the benefits first hand with synthetics. I have seen many industrial applications ruined by using alike in kind oils that were not specifically on the manufacturers list of accepted lubricants. If I told all of you here that Shell was insistant on using their brand of oil in everything that they own, and were self inflicting failurers of $75,000 high speed gear boxes, you would all probably call me a liar, or laugh at me. After Shell had changed out about 5 of these, they wanted to know what was causing these failurers, the manufacturer told them that when they stamped the data tag Use Mobil SHC 628 Only, that was what they meant, period. Their service manuals also stated this as well, they gave no alternative or API rating of equivilant oil that would work. Since they ate the loss of the 5 gearboxes, and a little crow, they changed to Mobil SHC 628 and have had no failurers since. (BTW mobil is probably the worlds leader in gear oils and is recomended by more manufacturers than any other in the world, for industrial applications anyway) I personally have never been a Mobil engine oil fan. My opinion or any other does not make this a bad oil. But this is an area that is divided by personal choice, and an API equivalant rating to allow us this choice.
Their are also a lot of advertising schemes and gimics used in the sale of lubricants. Many allow this to sway their opinion, such as the case where someone stated that Rotella T does not contain anti foam additives. Just because it does not offer that info on the label, that person assumed that it did not contain these required additives for a 6.0L PSD engine. Which in fact it does, as does every other oil that carries the API CI-4 rating.
Some other confusion here was what the s and the c actually stood for in the API ratings system well again here is info directly form their site.
The top of the Donut shows the oil's performance level for gasoline and/or diesel engines. The letter "S" followed by another letter (for example, SL) refers to oil suitable for gasoline engines. The letter "C" followed by another letter and/or number (for example, CH-4) refers to oil suitable for diesel engines. These letters officially stand for "Service" and "Commercial." The current API performance categories that can appear in the top part of the Donut are listed in the API Service Category Chart.
I have been involved in many oil disputes on many boards on the web. Their are alot of hip shooters that make claims one way or the other. Having worked for most of the major oil companies in this country, and worked in a few of thier refineries, I have a pretty good knoweldge of what is BS, and what is fact. Especially since I am a natural gas engine/compressor mechanic, which except for the magneto, spark plugs,and compression ratio, are identical to their diesel counterparts, weather it be Cat, Cummins, Onan, or Waukesha.
Ryan
I know the benefits first hand with synthetics. I have seen many industrial applications ruined by using alike in kind oils that were not specifically on the manufacturers list of accepted lubricants. If I told all of you here that Shell was insistant on using their brand of oil in everything that they own, and were self inflicting failurers of $75,000 high speed gear boxes, you would all probably call me a liar, or laugh at me. After Shell had changed out about 5 of these, they wanted to know what was causing these failurers, the manufacturer told them that when they stamped the data tag Use Mobil SHC 628 Only, that was what they meant, period. Their service manuals also stated this as well, they gave no alternative or API rating of equivilant oil that would work. Since they ate the loss of the 5 gearboxes, and a little crow, they changed to Mobil SHC 628 and have had no failurers since. (BTW mobil is probably the worlds leader in gear oils and is recomended by more manufacturers than any other in the world, for industrial applications anyway) I personally have never been a Mobil engine oil fan. My opinion or any other does not make this a bad oil. But this is an area that is divided by personal choice, and an API equivalant rating to allow us this choice.
Their are also a lot of advertising schemes and gimics used in the sale of lubricants. Many allow this to sway their opinion, such as the case where someone stated that Rotella T does not contain anti foam additives. Just because it does not offer that info on the label, that person assumed that it did not contain these required additives for a 6.0L PSD engine. Which in fact it does, as does every other oil that carries the API CI-4 rating.
Some other confusion here was what the s and the c actually stood for in the API ratings system well again here is info directly form their site.
The top of the Donut shows the oil's performance level for gasoline and/or diesel engines. The letter "S" followed by another letter (for example, SL) refers to oil suitable for gasoline engines. The letter "C" followed by another letter and/or number (for example, CH-4) refers to oil suitable for diesel engines. These letters officially stand for "Service" and "Commercial." The current API performance categories that can appear in the top part of the Donut are listed in the API Service Category Chart.
I have been involved in many oil disputes on many boards on the web. Their are alot of hip shooters that make claims one way or the other. Having worked for most of the major oil companies in this country, and worked in a few of thier refineries, I have a pretty good knoweldge of what is BS, and what is fact. Especially since I am a natural gas engine/compressor mechanic, which except for the magneto, spark plugs,and compression ratio, are identical to their diesel counterparts, weather it be Cat, Cummins, Onan, or Waukesha.
Ryan
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Ryan
Regards,
Morris
If the Truck & SUV formula is the same as Delvac 1, don't you think they'd sell it in the same sized container? Could be that they are packaging it differently for its intended market, most trucks and SUV's only require 5 quarts.



