Chocking a 6637...
Crap happens and at least that mistake was taken with humor and didn't require a fix action.
I will make sure it is a dry filter though before purchasing. I run a washable dry filter in my other vehicles as well and like the versatility they provide.
All of that said, RacinJasonWV has shown us that even the AIS is capable of great air flow, so I say go with what suits your needs and makes you smile.
Brokestroke brings up a good point about commercial diesel applications that I cannot speak to, but am interested in learning more about it.
but how about more adequate than was previously thought. So far the AIS with fender sleeve is suiting my needs very well with the T4 363/68. I am a bit of an oddball though.
1) All of the filter covers I used to make for Clay were double knit, 100% polyester, and had some stretch in them. They had a great capacity for air flow (read as very low restriction when clean). One customer ran a cover on a new 6637 on a Flow Bench, and at 1000 cfm, there was only about a 1% reduction in airflow with the cover. Keep in mind that 1000 CFM is about 2.5x higher than what is is rated at, IIRC, and that the amount of restriction would decrease with reduced air flow rates. For those of you who purchased covers through either Clay or directly from me... another big Thank You!
2) All of the current covers sold by Clay are a completely different fabric with a completely different structure. I am not saying, proposing, or even suggesting that one is better than the other -- they are simply different, and each will have it's own set of pros and cons. I have no data or insights on the airflow restriction (or lack thereof) with the new covers, aside from what I just stated. I can say, though, that the thicker, double-knit construction of the early covers would naturally have a higher dirt holding capacity than the current ones, but that is not always a significant issue at all for those who stay to the pavement in non-desert conditions or those who do not spend much time on dirt roads.
3) Do not ever get sidetracked (suckered) by any sales pitch about using "water resistant" or "water proof" pre-filters -- it's a marketing claim which, pardon the pun, doesn't hold water.
4) The "Big Boost" has an inner cone at the end of the filter body which provides more filtration surface area, and this means several things...
a) a pre-filter will not be as helpful on the Big Boost because the current covers on the market do not have a flat (or conical) end panel to protect the inner cone,
b) you can get more air flow with the larger filtration surface area, and
c) the larger filtration surface area can be realized by either lower air velocity and better filtration, or longer life for the pre-filter and filter element, or a combination of those two.
No new insights above... just wanted to float a few facts to the surface.















