Notices
Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

RIP Titan XD Cummins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2019 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
82_F100_300Six's Avatar
82_F100_300Six
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 30
RIP Titan XD Cummins

Nissan is pulling the plug
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2019 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
Akley88's Avatar
Akley88
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 313
makes sense sales were horrible
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2019 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,507
Likes: 5,563
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
but but but it has a cummings!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2019 | 05:47 PM
  #4  
82_F100_300Six's Avatar
82_F100_300Six
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 30
something has happened with Nissan
in the 2000's the Titan seemed like a solid truck and was popular
also the Maxima was a good car
idk...
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2019 | 06:42 AM
  #5  
Akley88's Avatar
Akley88
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 313
Originally Posted by 82_F100_300Six
something has happened with Nissan
in the 2000's the Titan seemed like a solid truck and was popular
also the Maxima was a good car
idk...
They just take to long to update models and they like those crap CVTs to much
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2019 | 09:58 AM
  #6  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
Personally, the XD Cummins was the perfect choice for me.

I do not tow very heavy or very often, but when I do, the trailer weighs 11,000 lbs. - 12,000 lbs.

I know that all of the Big 3 have 1/2 ton "heavy tow" packages that are rated at 11k-12k lbs. towing. But go to Youtube and read all the comparison tests and the posts from people who have switched from 1/2 tons to the XD. All of them agree that above 9000 lbs. or so, the XD towing is much more stable.

Also, none of the 1/2 tons produce 555 ft-lbs. at 1600 RPM.

Set it and forget it. That's how I like to drive. I can do that with the Cummins. I cannot in a gasser 1/2 ton.

The XD is about 1-2 generations behind the Big 3. And the Cummins is no fuel sipper. But my XD rides comfortably and quietly at 70 MPH. The wife like the ride and quiet, so life is good.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2019 | 02:44 PM
  #7  
KCJackson1's Avatar
KCJackson1
Tuned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 467
Likes: 48
From: Mount Arlington, NJ
Originally Posted by jschira
Personally, the XD Cummins was the perfect choice for me.

I do not tow very heavy or very often, but when I do, the trailer weighs 11,000 lbs. - 12,000 lbs.

I know that all of the Big 3 have 1/2 ton "heavy tow" packages that are rated at 11k-12k lbs. towing. But go to Youtube and read all the comparison tests and the posts from people who have switched from 1/2 tons to the XD. All of them agree that above 9000 lbs. or so, the XD towing is much more stable.

Also, none of the 1/2 tons produce 555 ft-lbs. at 1600 RPM.

Set it and forget it. That's how I like to drive. I can do that with the Cummins. I cannot in a gasser 1/2 ton.

The XD is about 1-2 generations behind the Big 3. And the Cummins is no fuel sipper. But my XD rides comfortably and quietly at 70 MPH. The wife like the ride and quiet, so life is good.
You've described the actual problem with the engine. More powerful but significantly thirstier than a half-ton diesel, but nowhere near the capability of a 3/4-ton diesel.

The F-150, Silverado/Sierra 1500, and Ram 1500 all approach the Cummins 5.0 in power-to-weight ratio, and are starting to approach the torque output in direct numbers with the updated Ram 3.0 now rated at 480 lb-ft. All three half-ton diesels can easily hit 30 mpg highway driven reasonably without having to resort to hypermile tactics. On the other end, the F-250, Silverado/Sierra 2500, and Ram 2500 offer a minimum of 850 lb-ft of diesel torque, thus far more capable than the Titan XD. While the niche of the XD works for some like yourself, the majority of buyers didn't see it that way, The two main purposes of a diesel in a light truck are better fuel economy or significant working power. The Cummins 5.0 lacked on both ends to most truck buyers.

Additionally, the poor sales at Nissan meant poor sales for Cummins. Some reports said Cummins was the catalyst because they didn't have the engine sales to justify continued production. Other reports said Nissan was the catalyst because while take rate was sufficient at 50% for the XD, the actual sales numbers were simply too low for them to continue with the extra production costs necessary to build the diesel. Whether it was Cummins, Nissan, or both... the result is the same.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2019 | 02:57 PM
  #8  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
Originally Posted by KCJackson1
You've described the actual problem with the engine. More powerful but significantly thirstier than a half-ton diesel, but nowhere near the capability of a 3/4-ton diesel.

The F-150, Silverado/Sierra 1500, and Ram 1500 all approach the Cummins 5.0 in power-to-weight ratio, and are starting to approach the torque output in direct numbers with the updated Ram 3.0 now rated at 480 lb-ft. All three half-ton diesels can easily hit 30 mpg highway driven reasonably without having to resort to hypermile tactics. On the other end, the F-250, Silverado/Sierra 2500, and Ram 2500 offer a minimum of 850 lb-ft of diesel torque, thus far more capable than the Titan XD. While the niche of the XD works for some like yourself, the majority of buyers didn't see it that way, The two main purposes of a diesel in a light truck are better fuel economy or significant working power. The Cummins 5.0 lacked on both ends to most truck buyers.
I have long been opposed to the "mine is bigger" mentality when it comes to diesel 3/4 tons.

I am satisfied with 300 or so horsepower and 500-600 ft.-lbs. of torque and the better fuel economy that comes with it.

But with most things in my life, it seems, no one really cares what I want.

PS - I was sad to see that the new 7.3L gasser does not hit peak torque until 4000 RPM, although the torque number looks decent at 2500 RPM. But not good enough to get me out of my XD.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Aug 16, 2019 | 04:49 PM
  #9  
KCJackson1's Avatar
KCJackson1
Tuned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 467
Likes: 48
From: Mount Arlington, NJ
I agree there's a place for that level of output with better fuel economy than what a gasser will provide. My 2005 Ram Cummins is 325/610 and that's a nice sweet spot for me... one of the reasons I still have the thing after 14 years. The 2020 Ram 1500 diesel at 260/480 with the eTorque mild hybrid system is a more practical truck for me at this point than a 400/1000 Cummins 6.7 in a Ram 3500. The F-150 diesel has limited availability, so I don't want to be caught in a situation where I am forced to select trim level A, packages B and C, and options D, E, F, and G just to have the diesel. (And whomever is drawing and approving the Silverado and Sierra designs need to update their resumes and find new lines of work.)

But for people like you who fit the niche of the Titan XD diesel... unfortunately, there weren't enough of you to make it viable long-term.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2019 | 06:23 PM
  #10  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,507
Likes: 5,563
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
i prefer my 195 HP 1988 IDI diesel with non wastegated turbo over all of them. it has plenty of power to do whatever i ask it to, and has been doing so perfectly for almost 1/2 million miles.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2019 | 06:09 AM
  #11  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,024
Likes: 1,519
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
On another note, the Titan Platinum seems to be a great option for those looking for a loaded truck. While it doesn't offer ever single little gadget that the Detroit trucks offer, it's price point is well suited for a loaded truck.

Too bad for the Cummins truck. In my mind, the Titan only competed against the Tundra.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ramair428cjxr7
Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
11
Oct 31, 2018 01:31 PM
Gunnerboy
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Mar 27, 2017 12:32 PM
mad modder
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
18
Oct 13, 2008 09:49 PM
WHT00EX
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
16
Aug 14, 2008 05:21 PM
TXsnyper
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
10
Mar 3, 2006 06:26 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE