Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

1966 F100 E-Brake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 08:06 AM
  #1  
CJ06SLT's Avatar
CJ06SLT
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Western MA
1966 F100 E-Brake

Looking for a little help on the e-brake / parking brake

Backgound - Massachusetts in their infinite governmental wonderfulness just revised our vehicle inspection (10/01/17) process to include no less than 5 cameras and a digital log of the process. Safety inspections were already pretty overboard. This new update is to crack down on vehicles passing inspection that may be close enough. Of course, this makes it even more difficult to have a street legal vintage car / truck.

Current issue - Mass requires the e-brake to hold the vehicle in the lowest forward gear at 1200-1300 rpm. My buddy has a 66 F100 with the 352 and the NP435, just like mine. He had just rebuilt and adjusted everything, truck holds fine on hills, but not in gear as required. My truck currently has the brakes apart, so I can't check this out on mine at the moment.

Does anyone out there have parking brakes that do hold under the above conditions? If so, I assume there must be issues with the system. If not, what can be done!?

Thanks in advance!
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 08:30 AM
  #2  
Crop Duster's Avatar
Crop Duster
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Air Force
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 962
From: Tri Cities, TN
Club FTE Silver Member

That sounds like something thought up by a bureaucrat. I'm sure it never occurred to any of those idiots that a vehicle like a truck with a rear gear possibly as low as 4:56 could overpower any handbrake. The only way to get that brake to hold under those conditions is to depress the brake pedal hard then set the parking brake. Or show up with a 2:50 rear gear.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 09:16 AM
  #3  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
New parts need a little time to settle in, keep in mind a good brake job "back in the day" used to include arcing the shoe linings prior to installation to fit the drums closely. They would work a lot better, right from the git go. Drums that had been turned got oversized shoes/linings. Depending on the drum diameter, and shoes, adjustment etc they may not be contacting very much of the drum surface, consequently the rear brakes may not be working quite as well as they should. Just spitballing. Brake linings need to go through a heat cycle to bake off and cure the resins and binders or they will glaze over and never work very well.

As a practical matter cinch up the self adjusters a block away from the test station and limp in. It oughtta hold then. He does have them set to a light drag right? Drum brakes can't be adjusted where the wheel is freewheeling, this is a common error. Not saying that's what's happening here but drum brake knowledge and understanding ain't what it used to be. Is cable stretched excessively? Good test, I'll have to try this with my slick and see how well they hold and report back. Mine's a manual. New brake system. assume this situation with your friend is with an A/T?
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 09:26 AM
  #4  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

The only way to get that brake to hold under those conditions is to depress the brake pedal hard then set the parking brake.
Well, actually that is how the parking brake should be set. I fought this in MD some years back with medium truck (and I can see their point and understand the reasoning).

Just make sure the new brake shoes are seated correctly, the self-adjusters work correctly and the cable(s) are not stretched out of spec.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
AZSCAWPION's Avatar
AZSCAWPION
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 713
1 more reason to be happy that I live where I do. No inspections of any kind regardless of year.

The Ford Truck manual states that "the parking brake should hold the truck stationary on a reasonable grade without difficulty". Now, who determines what "reasonable" is? My point though, is that I don't think they were ever designed to do what you say they must. With a 390 4bbl, dual exhaust and 4:10 gears, mine certainly does not.

I agree with the previous posters though- limp in and stand on the pedal while engaging the parking brake.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 10:08 AM
  #6  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by AZSCAWPION

I agree with the previous posters though- limp in and stand on the pedal while engaging the parking brake.
This way you are not stressing/stretching the cable(s) and the shoes will be (should be) extended fully to the drum.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 10:12 AM
  #7  
CJ06SLT's Avatar
CJ06SLT
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Western MA
Thanks for the replies, I'll forward some of this over to him. Can't say I'm surprised that Mass wants us to do the impossible! May have to look into how to fight the law on this one.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 02:20 PM
  #8  
rexblue's Avatar
rexblue
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Dunnellon, Florida
I wonder if I'm acting stupid by asking how one is supposed to test the parking brake holding capacity at 1200-1300 rpm with a manual transmission?
The mechanics of such an operation confuse me unless somehow one could slip the clutch to maintain the rpm. Otherwise wouldn't the vehicle just stall?
Maybe manual transmission vehicles are exempt from this testing? Can someone take the time to explain this?
rx
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 06:27 PM
  #9  
CJ06SLT's Avatar
CJ06SLT
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Western MA
You know, I was thinking the same exact thing. I read the whole mass law and it doesn't differentiate between the two, so we're stuck with it I guess.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 08:34 PM
  #10  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
It obviously applies to automatic transmissions, that's the whole point of the requirement.

Bureaucratic drones are not allowed to think too much, use discretion or common sense they get punished or lose their job if they do, so...
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Level2
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
15
Oct 3, 2008 07:47 PM
dubbz
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
9
Sep 15, 2008 08:37 AM
BigBadPowerstrok
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Nov 13, 2007 01:32 AM
Philywilly
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
3
Sep 9, 2005 07:56 PM
cbmark
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
3
Dec 6, 2003 11:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE