1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Testing your intercooler knowledge.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-06-2015, 10:28 PM
Ezalycasaid's Avatar
Ezalycasaid
Ezalycasaid is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: State of Delusion.
Posts: 1,002
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Testing your intercooler knowledge.

I just installed a 6.0 intercooler into my obs 7.3 and I have a few questions. When I first set it up and started running my truck with just the truck empty the egts started climbing much faster then before. I also lost about 3psi of boost. But my egts wont climb above 1250 now with just the truck. Then I put the camper behind the truck and the egts came up just as fast but wont get past 1200 with my foot pegged into the floor.

My question is why doesnt the egts climb accordingly?
It seems like my trucks egts would take longer to get up to 1200, but it climbs faster, then stops like it has a ceiling.

Also why does it stop at 1250 degrees empty and 1200 with a camper?
 
  #2  
Old 08-07-2015, 07:35 AM
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Tugly is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia River
Posts: 18,797
Received 111 Likes on 66 Posts
Your MAP sensor is "downwind" from the intercooler. If you are losing 3PSI boost, then the intercooler is doing its job well - in a measurable way. I'll bet if you had a boost sensor before the intercooler, you would not likely see a difference. I'll explain:

The intercooler's job is to increase air density by cooling the air. Radical cooling can actually reduce the air volume, which lowers boost on the MAP sensor. With denser air hitting the intake, the combustion events behave differently - they should theoretically occur faster. Faster combustion makes for a cooler EGT under load, this is why Ford installed an intercooler on the Superduties. I am still trying to think my way through the quicker EGT climb - maybe someone can help sort that out.
 
  #3  
Old 08-07-2015, 08:13 AM
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
white Buffalo is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
do you have a scanner or something like Auto Enginuity?

It might help if you can read the Manifold air temp & air intake temps.
 
  #4  
Old 08-07-2015, 10:45 AM
Ezalycasaid's Avatar
Ezalycasaid
Ezalycasaid is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: State of Delusion.
Posts: 1,002
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Tugly
Your MAP sensor is "downwind" from the intercooler. If you are losing 3PSI boost, then the intercooler is doing its job well - in a measurable way. I'll bet if you had a boost sensor before the intercooler, you would not likely see a difference. I'll explain:

The intercooler's job is to increase air density by cooling the air. Radical cooling can actually reduce the air volume, which lowers boost on the MAP sensor. With denser air hitting the intake, the combustion events behave differently - they should theoretically occur faster. Faster combustion makes for a cooler EGT under load, this is why Ford installed an intercooler on the Superduties. I am still trying to think my way through the quicker EGT climb - maybe someone can help sort that out.
Thanks for the reply.

My theory on why the egts rise faster is because the intercooler is acting as a restriction in low boost/rpms situations. So the amount of air going into the intake is slightly slower/restricted. Once my boost climbs, more air is jammed through the restriction and able to allow the intercooler to properly work. Im probably wrong though.
 
  #5  
Old 08-07-2015, 11:10 AM
F250_'s Avatar
F250_
F250_ is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Looking towards Greenvill
Posts: 11,223
Received 199 Likes on 107 Posts
It's not a restriction issue unless you installed a used and/or partially plugged IC. Please don't be offended by this question because we've all had out DUH moments (some more than others, like myself)... Any chance you left a rag in either an IC tube or nozzle?
 
  #6  
Old 08-07-2015, 12:45 PM
Ezalycasaid's Avatar
Ezalycasaid
Ezalycasaid is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: State of Delusion.
Posts: 1,002
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by F250_
It's not a restriction issue unless you installed a used and/or partially plugged IC. Please don't be offended by this question because we've all had out DUH moments (some more than others, like myself)... Any chance you left a rag in either an IC tube or nozzle?
No offense taken. Cant find stupid things Ive done that can easily be fixed untill someone points them out. Im almost positive theres no rags/obstructions in it. The only obstruction that could exist is on the inlet side of the ic my tube is slightly bowed in from touching the side of the front clip support.
 
  #7  
Old 08-07-2015, 12:46 PM
Ezalycasaid's Avatar
Ezalycasaid
Ezalycasaid is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: State of Delusion.
Posts: 1,002
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Ive also noticed that my outlet side of the ic pipe. Or the passenger side return pipe is hot while in the engine compartment. Would wrapping it in some insulated tape help keep it cooler, with noticeable temp reduction?
 
  #8  
Old 08-07-2015, 01:40 PM
Walleye Hunter's Avatar
Walleye Hunter
Walleye Hunter is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Douglassville, PA
Posts: 10,421
Received 888 Likes on 625 Posts
Would denser air=more oxygen resulting in a better, hotter burn thus resulting in faster climb in EGT's?
 
  #9  
Old 08-07-2015, 02:38 PM
holeshotwalt's Avatar
holeshotwalt
holeshotwalt is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dustbowl, NV
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F250_
Any chance you left a rag in either an IC tube or nozzle?
This was my first thought too after reading the symptoms!
 
  #10  
Old 08-08-2015, 06:43 AM
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Tugly is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia River
Posts: 18,797
Received 111 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter
Would denser air=more oxygen resulting in a better, hotter burn thus resulting in faster climb in EGT's?
While the cooler air has less volume, it still has the same number of oxygen molecules. Less volume air going in = less compression = cooler air again. I know from experience that a faster injection cycle = cooler EGTs all around - but I don't know how this all plays out with the thermodynamics of cooler air vs. burn time.
 
  #11  
Old 08-09-2015, 12:19 PM
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
white Buffalo is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When the engine is up to operating temp can you hold your hand on the passenger side CAC tube without having to let go from the heat?

The MAT temps (post intercooler) should be within 10-15 degrees of OAT or air intake temp.
 
  #12  
Old 09-19-2015, 09:13 AM
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
white Buffalo is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by white Buffalo
When the engine is up to operating temp can you hold your hand on the passenger side CAC tube without having to let go from the heat?

The MAT temps (post intercooler) should be within 10-15 degrees of OAT or air intake temp.
Any luck?

We are taking the schools marching band trailers to the game. Just screwing around and thought I would do some air temperature data logging.

EGT's @ 800


 
  #13  
Old 09-19-2015, 10:22 PM
JT250's Avatar
JT250
JT250 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 2,793
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Subscribing
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
corksil
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
24
07-23-2015 07:36 PM
anassar11
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
3
04-07-2012 08:23 PM
Neal 97 250
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
19
09-19-2008 01:47 PM
'02STROKER
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
09-10-2006 07:23 PM
puffer
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
16
11-27-2005 02:27 PM



Quick Reply: Testing your intercooler knowledge.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.