Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel Hose Routing Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-24-2015, 11:56 AM
DrZoom's Avatar
DrZoom
DrZoom is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Boston, KY
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Hose Routing Question

Is there any reason I shouldn't use some 90* elbows when routing my rubber fuel hose? I want to keep things tidy and keep the line as short as possible. Since rubber hose has a large bend radius, I was thinking some 90* brass fittings would do the trick. Anybody think it's a bad idea?? I am not sure I've seen it before, and want to make sure there isn't some reason like flow restriction.
 
  #2  
Old 04-24-2015, 12:58 PM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,300
Likes: 0
Received 355 Likes on 285 Posts
Well certainly it's going to restrict flow more than if you just run the hose around the corner. You've got a 460 there with, I am assuming, a 4V carb, so demand is fairly high at WOT. Depends on how big of a fuel line you are running, I guess.
 
  #3  
Old 04-24-2015, 01:13 PM
DrZoom's Avatar
DrZoom
DrZoom is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Boston, KY
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you would advise against elbows in a 3/8" rubber setup? The truck already hesitates at WOT, likely due to a 600 CFM carb that needs to be fine tuned. I know there is a lot of discussion out there on pressure vs. flow, and I can see how decreasing square inches of the hose profile keeps the same pressure with lower flow...I was hoping to hear it doesn't matter because I want to tidy up the hood, but I guess I'll plan on using straight hose, aside from the return that exits at a 90* angle from the fuel flow. Maybe the solution is a number of clamps attached to the firewall to bend the hose as best as I can to keep the radius down.
 
  #4  
Old 04-24-2015, 01:36 PM
DrZoom's Avatar
DrZoom
DrZoom is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Boston, KY
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...ok, just did a bit of research - a 3/8" NPT elbow is 3/8" inner diameter, which is the same as the fuel hose. So, since there are no restrictions in diameter, would it still restrict flow??
 
  #5  
Old 04-24-2015, 03:46 PM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,300
Likes: 0
Received 355 Likes on 285 Posts
You still have a restriction in that the fuel has to transition to the elbow and also make the sharp turn. It's probably not enough of a problem to even measure, so maybe the answer is, in actual practice, no. However, I am having a hard time visualizing where you have this mass of fuel line that needs taming.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dpoc
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
05-03-2016 11:16 AM
'94IDITurbo7.3
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
16
01-22-2012 02:27 PM
MadAustinite
3.8 & 4.2L V6
2
04-02-2011 11:05 PM
84-250
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
9
10-17-2009 02:58 PM
1990350
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
2
04-17-2009 09:38 PM



Quick Reply: Fuel Hose Routing Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.