Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

B codes or C codes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 08:03 AM
  #1  
nmlewis's Avatar
nmlewis
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
B codes or C codes

I have an 05 x that I am going to be towing a Travel Trailer that is almost 11K pounds. Should I get B codes or C codes?


I am going to be putting on Bilstein 5100s.


If I use C codes would dual shocks on the rear help with the harsh ride unloaded or use 5160s?
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 08:45 AM
  #2  
Gene Horr's Avatar
Gene Horr
Senior User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: South Texas/RGV
I have the B code in the rear and while I haven't towed that much weight yet I did just do a trip with about 1300# in the rear and have towed about 6000# with the rear empty.


From this limited experience unless you are planning on have a large load in the rear of the vehicle while towing the B springs should be fine but I would consider a rear anti-sway bar a necessity.


The ride will feel harsher no matter what you do. But it isn't that bad - about the same as a F250 unloaded. You will gripe about it for the first two weeks then afterwards you won't even notice it. I have the Rancho 9000 shocks installed and keep them dialed at the lightest setting for daily driving.


Things like proper adjustment of the load leveling hitch, rear anti-sway bar, and proper maintenance of the front end will affect your towing, not going to C codes instead of B codes IMO.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 10:35 AM
  #3  
RobRoss's Avatar
RobRoss
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: Flat Rock, MI
On my truck I went with SRW C codes, reason being is here https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ring-swap.html

Unloaded the C has a better chance to ride better because the secondary rate is later than the B.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 12:29 PM
  #4  
Gene Horr's Avatar
Gene Horr
Senior User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: South Texas/RGV
In that case I may be missing something. I had assumed the B springs were the "normal" rear (3000#) and the C were the slightly heavier (3300#) ones. This was from a chart from an aftermarket supplier but the searching became a bit confusing as what a "C" is depends on which model year.


If the only difference is the point that the additional leafs engage then Rob is correct and the C should give a smoother ride without a payload.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 02:03 PM
  #5  
RobRoss's Avatar
RobRoss
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: Flat Rock, MI
Originally Posted by Gene Horr
In that case I may be missing something. I had assumed the B springs were the "normal" rear (3000#) and the C were the slightly heavier (3300#) ones. This was from a chart from an aftermarket supplier but the searching became a bit confusing as what a "C" is depends on which model year.


If the only difference is the point that the additional leafs engage then Rob is correct and the C should give a smoother ride without a payload.
All of my research was part number based, I found the drawings and studied them. The rate/load I mention is from those drawings. I have no way to tell exactly which part number went with which spring code. If someone had a vin from truck with C codes (singe and dual wheel) I might be able to confirm the code(s) to the part number(s). From reading here I applied the codes to my spreadsheet of part numbers.

I think there are two C code versions, single rear wheel and dual

SRW - 330 lbs/in primary, 651 lb/in secondary, 1781 lbs transition, 2780 lbs max load

DRW - 350 lbs/in primary, 730 lb/in secondary, 1800 lbs transition, 3626 lbs max load

B Code - 320 lbs/in primary, 670 lb/in secondary, 1650 lbs transition, 2999 lbs max load

I looked at my spreadsheet and I don't see anything in my findings with a max load of ~3300 lbs.

I had sent my spreadsheet to one of the moderators but never heard back...

Does that help?
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
Krazee Matt's Avatar
Krazee Matt
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Gene Horr
In that case I may be missing something. I had assumed the B springs were the "normal" rear (3000#) and the C were the slightly heavier (3300#) ones. This was from a chart from an aftermarket supplier but the searching became a bit confusing as what a "C" is depends on which model year.


If the only difference is the point that the additional leafs engage then Rob is correct and the C should give a smoother ride without a payload.
That right there is most likely where your issues are coming from. Aftermarket supplied springs are rarely up to the same specs as Ford OEM springs. A large number of the aftermarket "X" springs are barely better, if at all, than the OEM "V" code's. Same for the rear aftermarket springs as well.

Tom (WE3ZS) actually just sent me the chart that floats around here every now and then as I am looking at potentially revamping my suspension from V's and B-mod's to X's and C's.

Originally Posted by WE3ZS
The following only applies to 4X4 EXs, the 2X4 rigs have coil springs up front. All EXs came from Ford with G code rear springs, the V-8 EXs all came with B (front B code is much different than rear B code, confused yet?) 4100lb, all V-10 EXs came with C code fronts at 4300lb and all PSD EXs had D codes at 4700lbs.
All the other codes discussed come from SuperDuty trucks (they came with springs that don't suck from Ford.)
Spring........Capacity.....Rate lbs/".....Max travel.....V-10 change.....PSD change
B (V-8)......4100lbs.......330 lb/".........5.02"...........-0.25".............-0.66"
C (V-10)....4300lbs.......350 lb/".........5.01".............0.00"............-0.37"
D (PSD).....4700lbs.......380 lb/".........5.14"...........+0.33".............0 .00"
S codes.....4000lbs.......370 lb/".........4.34"...........+1.22"............+0 .88"
T codes.....4400lbs.......390 lb/".........4.63"...........+1.42"............+1 .11"
U codes.....4800lbs.......410 lb/".........4.89"...........+1.60"............+1 .32"
V codes.....5200lbs.......430 lb/".........5.13"...........+1.77'............+1 .50"
W codes....5600lbs.......450 lb/".........5.34"...........+2.77'............+2 .52"
X codes.....6000lbs.......470 lb/".........5.54"...........+2.90"...........+2. 68"
W codes are from F-450s and X codes are from F-550s and other SD trucks with snow plow prep.

The above spring info has been gathered from posts here on FTE by "monsta" and "bruce1954".
I'd also recommend getting in touch with Junior from ATS (username ATS Junior) and see what he can do for you. Here's a blurb from the conversations he and I have been having via PM. I requested a rear spring similar to the C-codes but with some extra weight handling capacity for towing and here's what he suggested:
Originally Posted by ATS Junior
...I can offer you a C code for the rear of your truck but install an extra leaf in it with a slight re-arch to level the truck out. We offer this spring to a lot of guys who are looking for height along with extra capacity in the rear (you will see about 1,000 lbs more in the rear). Because we match the stock leaf steel thickness your ride quality will not suffer all that much. Will it stiffen up a little? Yes but no where near a ridiculous hard and rough ride...
Originally Posted by ATS Junior
...This wouldn't be a normal add a leaf. This will be a long leaf (longer the stronger) added to the pack. It will have the same steel thickness as the rest of the steel in the spring. Some companies give you a thick leaf to add to your spring and that thick leaf will actually take most of the weight because it's the thickest, what usually happens is that thick leaf will either get weak or it will break.

But to get back to your original question, the springs that we can offer will be a completely new spring with a leaf added to the pack with an entirely new arch put on the entire spring to give you the lift that you are in need of...
Hopefully some of that helps you out. I can say from personal experience that with the B-mod rear's the ride is not harsh, it's definitely more "trucky" than stock but nowhere near what I'd call harsh. Single Bilstein 5100's on all corners for me as well, duals out back is just asking to get pummeled to death (unless Cary has some trick rear setup up his sleeve). Not to mention I don't know where the heck you'd mount them, not exactly a lot of room to work with back there especially with the tank and exhaust.
I recently towed a friend's Duramax crewcab 4x4 on a 20' flatbed, I'd say the combined weight was smack dab between 10,200-11,500 lbs. With the B-mods out back and nothing else (no airbags, no RAS, no WD hitch) it made my truck squat so hard it was untowable. However, my rear bumpstops deteriorated long ago and I haven't replaced them yet. But the tires were rubbing on the fender flares. We had to load the truck on backwards (biiiiig no-no, I know) and take backroads at slow speeds to tow it safely.

I have no idea with you have a WD hitch, if not - get one. Tons of members here tow large trailers and they swear by them.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 02:57 PM
  #7  
RobRoss's Avatar
RobRoss
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: Flat Rock, MI
Keep in mind the load ratings in the above chart are GAWR and not max spring capacity. The #'s I quoted are max for each spring on a bench test.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #8  
Krazee Matt's Avatar
Krazee Matt
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by RobRoss
Keep in mind the load ratings in the above chart are GAWR and not max spring capacity. The #'s I quoted are max for each spring on a bench test.
Good catch, I was in a rush when I posted all that and meant to include what you mentioned. Thanks dude.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 09:25 PM
  #9  
Drunken_Unicorn's Avatar
Drunken_Unicorn
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 4
From: Idaho
Krazee Matt,
Is there similar chart like that for the rear springs?
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 11:10 PM
  #10  
Krazee Matt's Avatar
Krazee Matt
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Drunken_Unicorn
Krazee Matt, Is there similar chart like that for the rear springs?
That chart includes the rear springs, B & C codes are at the top. Does not include the F codes (08-12 IIRC) that are the same as C's I think.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 12:16 AM
  #11  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,050
Likes: 1,549
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Krazee Matt
That chart includes the rear springs, B & C codes are at the top. Does not include the F codes (08-12 IIRC) that are the same as C's I think.

No, the B and C codes on the chart are the stock fronts, Ford used the same letter codes for fronts and rears to avoid any confusion, see how well that is working out!
Rob Ross has done some great detective work on these EX/SD springs and has some very good spring info! Dig into his posts about these springs.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 12:31 AM
  #12  
Krazee Matt's Avatar
Krazee Matt
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
No, the B and C codes on the chart are the stock fronts, Ford used the same letter codes for fronts and rears to avoid any confusion, see how well that is working out!
Rob Ross has done some great detective work on these EX/SD springs and has some very good spring info! Dig into his posts about these springs.
WTaF Ford... Had me fooled forever with that damn thing. Im just full of useless misguided information tonight.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 09:24 AM
  #13  
RobRoss's Avatar
RobRoss
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: Flat Rock, MI
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
No, the B and C codes on the chart are the stock fronts, Ford used the same letter codes for fronts and rears to avoid any confusion, see how well that is working out!
Rob Ross has done some great detective work on these EX/SD springs and has some very good spring info! Dig into his posts about these springs.
Thanks Tom!

If you're buying new, my spreadsheet may help, if you looking for used then I think any SD springs (B, C-SRW, C-DRW, F, etc) would such an upgrade that you would be happy.

You may want to consider an adjustable shock, in general, if you have less spring rate you will need more damping and vice versa. The SD springs do have less primary where the Ex springs is more or less a fixed rate. In my case the adjustable shocks helped me dial in my ride and helped me balance the front to the rear. Adjustable shocks are only for compression and rebound, once the shock is moving, you have the same damping regardless of setting.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 10:25 AM
  #14  
nmlewis's Avatar
nmlewis
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
C Code

Thanks for all the input. I think I am going to go with c codes with an Extra leaf from Junior.


Now who sells 5100's that does custom valving?
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 08:33 PM
  #15  
Krazee Matt's Avatar
Krazee Matt
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by nmlewis
Thanks for all the input. I think I am going to go with c codes with an Extra leaf from Junior. Now who sells 5100's that does custom valving?
Good choice, that's what I'm getting as well. Extra 1000lbs capacity as well.

I got my valved 5100's from CTPerformance. However, after 18-mo I wish I had either gone stiffer or with his custom valved dual shock setup. Bit too little damping and rebound control for my liking. I didn't want standard aftermarket duals, I've ridden in several rigs with them and at city speeds they pummel you to death. Soak up high speed bumps with ease though.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spool&Go
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Jul 16, 2014 12:23 AM
Tinman27
Excursion - King of SUVs
21
Feb 24, 2014 11:14 PM
73ferdf250highboy
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
18
Jul 24, 2013 11:05 AM
Stolher
Excursion - King of SUVs
2
Jun 22, 2013 10:57 PM
nzirbel
Excursion - King of SUVs
5
Mar 12, 2012 08:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE