BD crankcase breather filter drain to case instead of catch can?
#1
BD crankcase breather filter drain to case instead of catch can?
I have most of the components for this kit:
http://www.dieselperformance.com/pro...troke_CCV5.pdf
The canister they are using is the ProVent 200:
https://www.mann-hummel.com/fileadmi...nt_en_2013.pdf
I don't have the catch can but can easily get one. Instead of getting the catch can, I was thinking of running the drain back down to a barbed fitting installed in the inspection bolt hole in the front driver side of the block.
7.3 Inspection Hole for Powdered Metal Rod Determination
This would make it self servicing instead of draining it periodically. It would also cut down on any oil losses.
Any reason not to have the engine re-using the oil that gets collected out of the crankcase vapors?
http://www.dieselperformance.com/pro...troke_CCV5.pdf
The canister they are using is the ProVent 200:
https://www.mann-hummel.com/fileadmi...nt_en_2013.pdf
I don't have the catch can but can easily get one. Instead of getting the catch can, I was thinking of running the drain back down to a barbed fitting installed in the inspection bolt hole in the front driver side of the block.
7.3 Inspection Hole for Powdered Metal Rod Determination
This would make it self servicing instead of draining it periodically. It would also cut down on any oil losses.
Any reason not to have the engine re-using the oil that gets collected out of the crankcase vapors?
#2
#3
I know this is an old thread but would like to know if the drain back to the inspection hole worked?
My truck has the BD Crank Case Filter installation on it done by a previous owner. Remembering to drain this thing is a pain that I would rather not have. Returning the oil to the crankcase sounds like a great idea.
Anyone know of issues with this?
My truck has the BD Crank Case Filter installation on it done by a previous owner. Remembering to drain this thing is a pain that I would rather not have. Returning the oil to the crankcase sounds like a great idea.
Anyone know of issues with this?
#4
I never knew there was inspection hole there. Neat. My only concern would question how effective the flow might be. If the crankcase is pressurized at all, then gases would try to flow out that hole as well, while the engine is running, and might be enough to prevent your canister from draining, while running. So as long as your canister is a) large enough to store all the oil it collects, and b) capable of separating all that oil from the gases that are redirected into the turbo inlet, then you should be good, as it'll drain when shut off.
I think the problem with the original doghouse design is that the "strainer" simply filled up with oil enough that the droplets eventually would get blown into the turbo inlet after extended running.
I think the problem with the original doghouse design is that the "strainer" simply filled up with oil enough that the droplets eventually would get blown into the turbo inlet after extended running.
#5
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
superduty4x4
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
21
07-31-2008 12:38 PM