Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Trans pan replacement options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 09:37 PM
  #31  
joe blow's Avatar
joe blow
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 869
As a matter of fact if the air was hotter around the trans pan it would be absorbing heat. Heat does in fact travel to cold, the greater the delta the faster it travels.
The air around the trans pan is NOT hotter than the pan on most of our trucks. You can say what you will about exhaust pipes and front air dams. Traveling 45-80mph on an average day in the US, the air across that pan is not hotter.

Its great that you worked with these trannys years ago. It really is. But maybe that's what is keeping YOU so hung up on thinking it is perfect in completely stock form. I preform development testing on turbine engines for a living, so yes, I do know a bit about thermodynamics. Nice how you throw in the higher temp statement while attempting belittle my knowledge. Nice try
If you have no proof of your testing we cant see the test conditions you speak of. So I'm going to tell you that I think you are wrong. I wont continue to argue with you about it.


Moving on now if you can keep it zipped shut???


AGE Mechanic,

I can appreciate your stance and willing to defend it but seriously dude, show some respect. From what I understand Mark K is THE guy you want to talk to about transmissions, especially these. Do you have hard facts to back your information?

Rep points don't come easy on this site especially when you have a $h*tload of reps as Mark K has from helping people on this site....just my opinion....relax

Bismic,
Thank you again for the help

Joe
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 09:56 PM
  #32  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I have been around here a long time and I did say that its my theory that the pans can help some. I have no info to back my claim and the claim of many others. He cannot produce anything to back his claim. I am all for scientific fact and was seriously interested in what the testing conditions were to support his claim.
I have seen many of his posts over the years and I respect the fact that he was an engineer on this trans. I do not respect the way he attempts to dumb down others with differing opinions.
I think you are making the right move going with the newer pan and filter. Everyone should do it when they service their tranny's next.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 10:05 PM
  #33  
joe blow's Avatar
joe blow
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 869
Sounds good....I like the fact I can change the internal filter to a REAL filter.....that is why I am so hyped about the '08 trans. I am not sure he made any reference to anyone being dumb, just offering his facts and advice.

Good Luck
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 05:53 AM
  #34  
wulfman's Avatar
wulfman
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 0
From: knox Tn
Club FTE Silver Member

Man this is great seeing how a simple ??? turned into the so much BULL SH-T but it was interesting reading. But the setup ford gave us is full poof and beside adding a filter which would be helpful doesn't need any modding . Example my friend has a chevy 01 2500 8.1 liter with the allison his normal trans temps empty 195 -200 that just around town and running down interstate . Put trailer behind it 210-220 . My TS has never been above 185 and that with 12 to 13 k of dump trailer behind it . HELL ITS FINE SPEND YOUR MONEY SOMEWHERE ELSE .
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 07:29 AM
  #35  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,709
Likes: 2,628
From: SE Florida
Originally Posted by AGE mechanic
I do not respect the way he attempts to dumb down others with differing opinions.
The difference is that you have an opinion with no facts, just your assertion that you think it should work that way. I have told you about testing I have done where I measured what you want to work and found that it didn't.

You are of course welcome to ignore what I tell you because I refuse to steal the testing from my former employer and post it here for your review.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 08:45 AM
  #36  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
The difference is that you have an opinion with no facts, just your assertion that you think it should work that way. I have told you about testing I have done where I measured what you want to work and found that it didn't.

You are of course welcome to ignore what I tell you because I refuse to steal the testing from my former employer and post it here for your review.
Oh..Ok, Actually the Difference is that you have your assertion that you remember certain results to a test you performed under unknown conditions. You have told us of a test you've done. The specific test conditions you were in have everything to do with the results. As an engineer you know this. One test condition does not give you enough data. You would have to test at a multitude of ambient temps, elevations, speed, vehicle heights and the list continues.

You of course are welcome to ignore what I tell you because I have no test data to support my claim either. So there we are, its still a personal choice. It is time to move on from this.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:08 AM
  #37  
joe blow's Avatar
joe blow
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 869
Originally Posted by wulfman
Man this is great seeing how a simple ??? turned into the so much BULL SH-T but it was interesting reading. But the setup ford gave us is full poof and beside adding a filter which would be helpful doesn't need any modding . Example my friend has a chevy 01 2500 8.1 liter with the allison his normal trans temps empty 195 -200 that just around town and running down interstate . Put trailer behind it 210-220 . My TS has never been above 185 and that with 12 to 13 k of dump trailer behind it . HELL ITS FINE SPEND YOUR MONEY SOMEWHERE ELSE .

You're onto something here......I definitely will be upgrading to the '08 pan and full flow filter.....I should have done that a while ago.

Thanks for the help....

.AGEmechanic....do you have a tft gauge and if so under similiar conditions, what type of temp drop did you see from the time you r&r'd to your new setup?

Thanks for the help
Joe
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:16 AM
  #38  
mustang_309's Avatar
mustang_309
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,138
Likes: 7
From: South Weber, Utah
My stock 06 Transmission has an internal filter, what is the difference between that and the 08?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:24 AM
  #39  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by joe blow
You're onto something here......I definitely will be upgrading to the '08 pan and full flow filter.....I should have done that a while ago.

Thanks for the help....

.AGEmechanic....do you have a tft gauge and if so under similiar conditions, what type of temp drop did you see from the time you r&r'd to your new setup?

Thanks for the help
Joe
I just use my CTS monitor. It does not monitor the temp in the pan. It is very difficult to say how much of an improvement there is. The last time I pulled my ToyHauler (12.5K lbs.) up the mountains here in AZ, The CTS monitor was recording a 188degF TFT. This was on a 108 degree day pulling a 6 mile 1500' to 5900'. I am pleased with that. But I have never tried to compare or do a before and after test.

At the very least you are improving your truck going with the newer pan and filter. Stock or aftermarket really doesn't matter much. I couldnt justify spending $250+ dollars on a aluminum pan. I went with the Derale, I paid around $130 for it. It holds an additional 8 quarts and I can use the new filter.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:31 AM
  #40  
69cj's Avatar
69cj
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 13,834
Likes: 25
From: Middle Tn.
Originally Posted by mustang_309
My stock 06 Transmission has an internal filter, what is the difference between that and the 08?
The 03 thru 07's have an internal screen that stops rocks and boulders and relies on the external bypass filter. The 08 and above have a real full flow internal filter.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:34 AM
  #41  
Unrealo4's Avatar
Unrealo4
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
From: Eagle Mountian, Utah
Originally Posted by mustang_309
My stock 06 Transmission has an internal filter, what is the difference between that and the 08?
The 06's internal filter is little better then a screen. The 08's is a actual filter.

Other then that I agree that there is really no reason to change the pan. But I doubt highly it doesn't do anything. I bet you Mag hytec has some results of testing.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #42  
joe blow's Avatar
joe blow
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 869
Originally Posted by AGE mechanic
I just use my CTS monitor. It does not monitor the temp in the pan. It is very difficult to say how much of an improvement there is. The last time I pulled my ToyHauler (12.5K lbs.) up the mountains here in AZ, The CTS monitor was recording a 188degF TFT. This was on a 108 degree day pulling a 6 mile 1500' to 5900'. I am pleased with that. But I have never tried to compare or do a before and after test.

At the very least you are improving your truck going with the newer pan and filter. Stock or aftermarket really doesn't matter much. I couldnt justify spending $250+ dollars on a aluminum pan. I went with the Derale, I paid around $130 for it. It holds an additional 8 quarts and I can use the new filter.
Not a bad deal either.....so yours also utilizes the newer stock full flow filter?
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:45 AM
  #43  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Unrealo4
The 06's internal filter is little better then a screen. The 08's is a actual filter.

Other then that I agree that there is really no reason to change the pan. But I doubt highly it doesn't do anything. I bet you Mag hytec has some results of testing.
I got help now. Lets get him...
Too funny.

I had the Mag-Hytec trans pan and Diff covers on my old 01 Cummins. They make a nice product for sure. Times are tighter over the last 4 years so I went the cheaper route.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:45 AM
  #44  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by joe blow
Not a bad deal either.....so yours also utilizes the newer stock full flow filter?
Yes it does.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:46 AM
  #45  
bismic's Avatar
bismic
Fleet Owner
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 27,888
Likes: 3,602
Club FTE Gold Member
The 08 pan is $55 at Tousley
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE