Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Exhaust Y-pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 10:53 AM
  #1  
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Martins Creek, PA
Exhaust Y-pipe

I was on another post yesterday discussing exhaust, but can't find it today. It was a nicely done van using Pacesetter headers and a custom 3" y-pipe.

I was so impressed with te fit of the headers, I ordered a set.

Now here's my question, and with some other posts I've seen, it may be more of an opinion. He used a 3inch y-pipe, into a single 3 inch exhaust. With the pacesetters having a 3" slip collector it was probably the easiest. I want to make my Y-pipe also, and am debatting (mostly with myself) whether to go 3 inch and keep it simple, or try to reduce it to 2.5" Y-pipe, into the 3" inch single.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 11:24 AM
  #2  
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 74
From: Hartford, AL
Personally I would stay with the 2.5". I have some pics of a 2.5" Y-pipe I built on this thread....https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1034582-y-pipe.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 11:36 AM
  #3  
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Martins Creek, PA
I checked it out, 73FOMO, nice work. My only concern is, that with the long tube headers into a 2.5 reducer, I won't have enough room for my y-pipe to turn nicely. With the 3" it simplifies things because there is no reducer to worry about.

I'd prefer 2.5 at the Y, but 3 is so much simpler. But if the popular oppinion is that it won't matter, then 3 it is!
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #4  
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 74
From: Hartford, AL
Go with what your comfortable with. 2.5" worked nicely for me and I didn't want to go to big and lose torque. I used Mandrel pipes so that makes a diff.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #5  
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Martins Creek, PA
The loss of torque, is why I'm debating. If running a 3in Y will be that counter productive, then I'll figure out how to make the 2.5 in work!
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 01:58 PM
  #6  
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Martins Creek, PA
Some times the obvious is so close you look right past it!! I'll weld a 3in 90 to the drivers collector, then reduce it to 2.5 right after it turns. The pass. collector can go right into a reducer. Then I can run 2.5 into the Y, and 3in out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 02:01 PM
  #7  
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 74
From: Hartford, AL
That should work. I picked up my 2.5 merge collector from Summit for around $26.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Atlfan65
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Jul 13, 2017 07:19 AM
powerstroke8806
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
3
Mar 29, 2016 01:09 AM
duetsch65
Modular V10 (6.8l)
92
Jan 28, 2012 10:48 PM
ericmarino
1997 - 2003 F150
2
Apr 28, 2009 12:05 AM
CJK440
Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
1
Dec 16, 2005 08:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.