351w Exhaust Question
You certainly could run a y pipe and a single exhaust. I think 4 inch is ridiculous as far as size goes, but that can be some people's theme. I would look at a later model truck with fuel injection, some places offer shortie headers that hookup to the original y-pipe. They won't list them as fitting the early trucks but those later trucks are basically the same and I do not see why they would not fit. You will probably have to plug one or two oxygen sensor holes, but there should be a solution to that somehow.
From what I've read an X-pipe is better than a Y-pipe. But it is really hard to do and not enough better to warrant the effort/cost. So I'd run a Y-pipe and duals back to a Magnaflow 2-into-1 muffler if you don't care for the dual sound. A Magnaflow will give you a deep sound without being obnoxious.
Trending Topics
As for X vs Y, I was wrong with what I said. If you run a Y-pipe you are automatically down to a single exhaust. But an X-pipe leaves you with dials and allows either bank to use both exhausts.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
As for the cutout, I don't see the need. It isn't going to sound good and it won't help the performance if your exhaust system is good. You may think it is running better because it is noisy, but the numbers won't back it up.
Example the square inch area inlet of a 2.5" pipe is about 5" Jump that pipe to 3.5" A 40% increase in diameter dose not yield a 40% increase in square area.
3.5" pipe has an inlet area of 9.6 square inches almost double with just 40% increase in diameter. A single 3.5" exhaust will flow about the same volume as 2.5" Duals.
It may actually flow more as the radii of bends will have to be larger on single the 3.5" and this will affect total flow numbers, in high pressure applications the reduction in friction loss's along the wall of the pipe will also factor in as less fluid/air will be in contact with the walls of the pipe as there is less pipe wall over all in a single 3.5" compared to dual 2.5".
There are some arguments for large singles over dual's and I know they can be set up top provide equal or even better scavenging as you get to work with the exhaust pulses from all cylinders. I'm not expert in that but I do know Radial engines take advantage of this when fitted with full exhaust manifolds.
About not fitting. Look at all the long tube header duals and even some of the manifold dual systems. If you got rid of the side gas tank you would be fine. But most people keep that, and have to run the driver's side exhaust pipe underneath the frame and get it over to the pass side, and try and run them side by side over there. I did one where I ran them under the frame and then on the outside of the frame. If you look at the truck from the side, you can see these pipes hanging down and they do not look good, they do look redneck.
Look at the stock exhaust. How it's tucked up nice and neat above the frame, and a nice spot where it crosses over under the engine up front. That's all I am saying, you can't run duals and make it look nice and neat without taking out the side gas tank on these trucks. Some people do, and run a large 38 gallon tank in the rear.
I copied/pasted this from another site - as the info is useful here. TTO summarize the info below, too large of an exhaust pipe will hurt low end torque. And torque is much more important in a street vehicle than HP.
Start of post:
Since many people get confused about backpressure, scavenging, exhaust sizing, etc., I wrote this up for another board. I just did a quick cut and paste here, so enjoy...
There is a common misconception that engines need backpressure in order to run properly, generate low end torque, etc. That is simply untrue. Backpressure is a bad thing. Always. Take a look at a top fuel dragster...how much backpressure do you think those zoomie headers make? Very little, and those engines produce 6500 hp.
So, what is backpressure? Any fluid flowing through a pipe experiences drag on the walls of the pipe. This depends on a number of factors, including the diameter of the pipe, the smoothness of the inside of the pipe, the viscosity of the fluid, and the velocity of the fluid. This drag results in a pressure drop through the pipe. In order for the fluid to flow at all, the pressure on one end of the pipe must be higher than at the other. In an exhaust system, that pressure drop is what we refer to as backpressure. It's pretty obvious that the engine has to produce this pressure differential, so the less power it has to spend making pressure to push the exhaust out, the more power it can send to the wheels.
Given that exhaust pipes are pretty smooth, and that we can't change the viscosity (thickness) of the waste gas being forced through the pipes, we are left with basically 2 parameters we can have any control over: The pipe diameter and the gas velocity.
Unfortunately, the pipe diameter controls the gas velocity since the volume of gas is prescribed by the engine. So, we really only have one thing we can change. So, bigger pipes allow less pressure drop for a given volume of gas because the velocity is lower. The pressure drop (backpressure increase) is proportional the gas velocity squared, so if I double the gas velocity (by reducing the cross sectional area of the exhaust pipe by half) then I quadruple the pressure drop.
Well, there's an easy solution for that: Just make the exhaust pipe bigger. Bigger pipe, lower gas velocity, less pressure drop, so less backpressure. Wow, that was easy. After all, this is the way it's done for basically any type of commercial plumbing system. Need less pressure drop on a chilled water pipe or a natural gas line? Just make the pipe bigger.
But wait, there's a problem....Having a huge exhaust pipe has killed my low end torque!!! What's different? Oh, there's no backpressure!! Therefore backpressure makes torque!
Wrong.
An exhaust system is different than just about any other plumbing situation. How? Because the flow is pulsed, and this turns out to be a big deal. Every time a pulse of exhaust gas runs through the pipe, a strange thing happens: it as it passes, it has a little area of vacuum behind it. Just like a NASCAR stocker running around the track, the pulse generates a little bit of a vacuum behind it. In NASCAR, a driver can take advantage of another driver's vacuum by getting right behind him and driving in it. The wind resistance is drastically reduced. This is called drafting.
Well, how big the vacuum behind each pules is depends on the gas velocity. The higher the velocity, the bigger the vacuum the pulse has behind it.
Now, this means that I can "draft" the next pulse, just like in NASCAR. In NASCAR, it's called drafting, in an exhaust system, it's called scavenging. You've probably seen this term used when talking about headers, but the same concept applies in the pipe.
I get the maximum scavenging effect if the gas velocity is high, so the pipe needs to be small. By maximizing the scavenging effect, I help to pull pulses out of the combustion chamber, which means the engine doesn't have to work as hard to do that.
This has the most effect when there's a bunch of time between pulses...in other words, at low rpm. As the revs rise, the pulsed flow becomes more and more like constant flow, and the scavenging effect is diminished.
So, at low rpm I need a small pipe to maximize scavenging, and at high rpm I need a big pipe to minimize pressure drop. My exhaust pipe can only be one size, so it's a compromise. For a given engine, one pipe diameter will make the most overall power (i.e., have the largest area under the curve on a dyno chart).
So, the loss of torque has nothing to do with backpressure, and everything to do with gas velocity. So you need exhaust components that are not restrictive (manifolds/headers, mufflers) and that are sized correctly for your application.
The one exception to sizing an exhaust is for turbo cars. Since the turbo is in the exhaust stream, the gas flow spinning the impeller tends to come out of the turbo with the pulses greatly diminished. In this case, you can get away with running a larger pipe than on an equivalent HP N/A engine because you can't take as much advantage of the scavenging effect.











