Ford Ranger Verses Chevrolet Colorado, Toyota Tacoma & Nissan Frontier

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 9, 2014 | 02:42 PM

edtahaney

Thread Starter

FTE Editor

Joined: Jul 2014

Posts: 323

Likes: 0

Ford Ranger Verses Chevrolet Colorado, Toyota Tacoma & Nissan Frontier

Read the comparison story here:

Ford Ranger Verses Chevrolet Colorado, Toyota Tacoma & Nissan Frontier - Ford Trucks

When will Ford bring the Ranger back?

Oct 9, 2014 | 05:14 PM

smlford

Fleet Mechanic

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,320

Likes: 13

From: Mid Atlantic

I could not agree more!
Why not call it the F-100 and sell a bunch of them! Particularly with the diesel....

The new 2.7 EB would also be a good fit for this truck

Oct 10, 2014 | 12:54 PM

Nighteyez

FTE Chapter Leader

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 21,090

Likes: 245

From: Fresno, CA.

Honestly I don't buy into Ford's reason for not selling the Ranger here. They state they don't want to hurt the F series, particularly the F-150. However, what difference does it make if people buy a Ranger over the F-150? They are still buying a Ford.

Jim

Oct 10, 2014 | 02:20 PM

exranger06

Senior User

Joined: Nov 2013

Posts: 482

Likes: 5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nighteyez

Because then they might not be able to advertise the F150 as America's best selling truck.

Sep 7, 2015 | 12:29 PM

Pgh Rebel

Fleet Mechanic

Joined: Apr 2014

Posts: 1,512

Likes: 7

From: Pittsburgh, PA

Like I wrote in another forum on the Ranger, from what I hear from a Ford sales rep, the whole reason comes down to Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)standards as determined by our "friends" in Washington. Ford already sells too many other large trucks and SUV's to justify another truck in the U.S. market. Other markets don't have those same standards. GM can probably justify the Colorado because they sell more small cars than they do trucks and SUV's. This to me makes more sense than Ford's excuse that they don't want to steal sales from the F-150. However they also need to save face in front of the Feds.
If they do decide to bring in the Ranger, I'd personally love to see them offer it with the 2.7 ecoboost and/or a small diesel engine. Not sure I'd buy the diesel, though. Also give me a smaller cab with a longer bed. I need my trucks for haulin!

Sep 8, 2015 | 03:55 PM

Thinlizzy13

Tuned

Joined: Jun 2011

Posts: 355

Likes: 1

From: CNY

Quote:

Originally Posted by smlford

I could not agree more!
Why not call it the F-100 and sell a bunch of them! Particularly with the diesel....

The new 2.7 EB would also be a good fit for this truck

X2, I'd like to see a diesel ranger.

F-100 would be interesting, maybe bring back the ranger trim level?

Sep 8, 2015 | 06:07 PM

heymrdj

Posting Guru

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 1,079

Likes: 2

From: Fort Wayne, IN

I don't think we'd see the 2.7 in a Ranger size vehicle, too much power for the capabilities of a true small pickup frame. I'd say the 2.3 EB would be better suited. Ranger/Escape are about in the same weight categories.