Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

WTF Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #16  
maxexurtion's Avatar
maxexurtion
New User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
My two cents, I had a 2000 with v10 and did 2 cross country trips to Phoenix from Milwaukee. Both times I saw mileage increase from 13 to 17MPG as I went south. Illinois seemed to be worse, so we avoided fills there. You have to love 44 gallons! The best gas milage seemed to be tanks starting in Oaklahoma and then west. Urbanxx might be on to something. Anyhow, I never cared, the Ex is the only way to travel with 5 of us and 3 dogs. No trailer those times, free boarding with my parents.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:05 PM
  #17  
sddesigns's Avatar
sddesigns
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 111,873
Likes: 153
From: Wharton, NJ
FTE Emeritus
Originally Posted by DRM
Not to be rude, but I have some serious doubts about the mileage claims some of you guys are making. If you guys have mileage records or excel spreadsheets - I'd love to see them. If you are using the overhead computer or just giving your guesstimate, no thanks.
Originally Posted by Gene Horr
DRM - A quote for you: After comparing mileage claims by their sales force to their actual mileage logs a manager I know made the statement "when it comes to mileage people lie a lot."

I've seen guys make claims after only putting a 1/4 tank of fuel and doing a calculation. If you don't have logs and multiple tanks of fuel to compare then your numbers are at best a very rough estimate. Heck, you can get filling errors of up to two gallons even in small (18 gallon) fuel tanks. This factor alone can give you up to 5% variation in measurements on each tank.

Another factor that people don't add in is their odometer error. The very best speedometer I've ever had was 3% off. 10% error is probably closer to the average.

Tire pressure differences can also lead to a 5% variation.

I wouldn't find it at all unusual to see single tank variations between two units of up to 30% when the vehicles are actually getting the exact same mileage. Due to the above factors. And then you add the issue of different drivers, terrains, wind speed, speeds, ....
Originally Posted by DRM
Thanks for the response, Gene.

As I have said in other threads, this is my 3rd Ford V10 vehicle, and I've kept hand calc'd records for every one of them as long as I owned them, corrected for odometer variations, too. I currently have a 98 Cummings truck that I have logged every mile and tank of fuel I have put in it since... 2003.

You can guess - this is an issue I take pretty serious

I purchased my Ex two years ago and have kept records of every fill up. I travel very little, I work less than a quarter of a mile from my office, used to drive my kids to various sporting functions for after school sports, I pull my 20' 4K boat 8.6 miles round trip to the lake approximately 20 times a season. I would think my local - highway driving would be somewhere around 85/15, I have only made six 300 mile trips and ten less than 100 mile trips. I didn't start keeping track until almost a month later on September 19, 2008 and I put 1K miles on.

In the two years I have had "Big Blue" I have only put on 12K miles, all of which have been verified to within .3 miles in 200 average by my Garmin GPS, and I have a SCT LiveWire 9600 tuner that compensates for the larger tires I have installed over the stock 265's, by adjusting the tire RPM's based on the manufacturers published specs.

Just click this Fuelly banner and my fill-up records are complete and concise, including tune changes, mods, trips and brand of fuel.


 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:39 PM
  #18  
shortboxd's Avatar
shortboxd
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Gene Horr
"when it comes to mileage people lie a lot."

If you don't have logs and multiple tanks of fuel to compare then your numbers are at best a very rough estimate.
I wouldn't even consider trying to give anyone an honest and factual report of the mpg a vehicle of mine was giving unless it was averaged a multitude of tankfuls- I'm talking literally years of ownership. Corrections for tire sizes are rarely figured in by the optimists, either.
The v10 is a great engine, and I've had both an F250 and F350 dually equipped with it. The dually NEVER broke into double digit mpg's (stock in every respect). It's shortcomings in the torque department, when compared to the diesel offering, is why I no longer have a gasser later-model Ford truck.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 01:18 AM
  #19  
Splash67's Avatar
Splash67
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, Indiana
Originally Posted by DRM
Not to be rude, but I have some serious doubts about the mileage claims some of you guys are making. If you guys have mileage records or excel spreadsheets - I'd love to see them. If you are using the overhead computer or just giving your guesstimate, no thanks.
Here is my mileage...no BS here...w w w .fuelly.com/driver/splash/excursion

let me know if the link works for you...
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 01:25 AM
  #20  
Splash67's Avatar
Splash67
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, Indiana
Originally Posted by sddesigns
I purchased my Ex two years ago and have kept records of every fill up. I travel very little, I work less than a quarter of a mile from my office, used to drive my kids to various sporting functions for after school sports, I pull my 20' 4K boat 8.6 miles round trip to the lake approximately 20 times a season. I would think my local - highway driving would be somewhere around 85/15, I have only made six 300 mile trips and ten less than 100 mile trips. I didn't start keeping track until almost a month later on September 19, 2008 and I put 1K miles on.

In the two years I have had "Big Blue" I have only put on 12K miles, all of which have been verified to within .3 miles in 200 average by my Garmin GPS, and I have a SCT LiveWire 9600 tuner that compensates for the larger tires I have installed over the stock 265's, by adjusting the tire RPM's based on the manufacturers published specs.

Just click this Fuelly banner and my fill-up records are complete and concise, including tune changes, mods, trips and brand of fuel.

Another Fuelly fan...I can't post the banner but I did post my link...
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 01:25 AM
  #21  
Splash67's Avatar
Splash67
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, Indiana
Originally Posted by Gene Horr
DRM - A quote for you: After comparing mileage claims by their sales force to their actual mileage logs a manager I know made the statement "when it comes to mileage people lie a lot."

I've seen guys make claims after only putting a 1/4 tank of fuel and doing a calculation. If you don't have logs and multiple tanks of fuel to compare then your numbers are at best a very rough estimate. Heck, you can get filling errors of up to two gallons even in small (18 gallon) fuel tanks. This factor alone can give you up to 5% variation in measurements on each tank.

Another factor that people don't add in is their odometer error. The very best speedometer I've ever had was 3% off. 10% error is probably closer to the average.

Tire pressure differences can also lead to a 5% variation.

I wouldn't find it at all unusual to see single tank variations between two units of up to 30% when the vehicles are actually getting the exact same mileage. Due to the above factors. And then you add the issue of different drivers, terrains, wind speed, speeds, ....
I ahve started using my GPS to track the mileage since I changed tires and the trucks odo readin is at least 5% off now...
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #22  
DRM's Avatar
DRM
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 245
Likes: 2
From: TN
Originally Posted by sddesigns
Just click this Fuelly banner and my fill-up records are complete and concise, including tune changes, mods, trips and brand of fuel.


Steve, your numbers are in line with what I expected to see.

I recently got an HTC EVO phone, so I am using the "Mileage" android app, but I might end up swapping over to fuelly. I really wish they would make an app so I could record on the go.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #23  
JD-Iowa's Avatar
JD-Iowa
New User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
01 V8 mileage (corrected)

My 2001 gas V8 2WD 4:10 Limited Slip will get16-18 MPG only when cruising on absolutely flat Freeways, no passengers, no trailer. I average 14.5, something I have noticed, even with the 4:10 gear with no load or trailer, this rig hunts gears constantly when running in hilly terrain and I get my absolute best mileage at 65MPH (anything below that I spend half the time out of O/D). Can't figure it, am sure glad I don't have the 3:73 that is standard on the V8, that would work it too hard. Has anybody run a comparison on mileage with different ratios? I would almost bet that a 4:30 would get better mileage than I do at 55 to 60MPH and would definitely pull better.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 12:28 AM
  #24  
EXCURSIONATOR1's Avatar
EXCURSIONATOR1
Senior User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: mt.prospect
Originally Posted by TYZ78F150
I thought I was the only one with a 2004 5.4 4x4. I know they're hard to come by. I just drove down to South Carolina and I filled up at half tank. I just had Magnaflow duals and a reworked downpipe installed in June. At just below a half tank, I had 300 miles on the trip. I was impressed, that was with the A/C on. Avg speed of 70 mph.
What was your mpg?
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:06 PM
  #25  
TYZ78F150's Avatar
TYZ78F150
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Stafford, VA
Originally Posted by EXCURSIONATOR1
What was your mpg?
Equaled out to be about 13 mpg. Man, that sounds bad!
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 08:02 AM
  #26  
JD-Iowa's Avatar
JD-Iowa
New User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Let's get a little perspective on this. We don't drive these things for economy purposes. Most of us bought them for the interior space and towing capacity.

I replaced a Toyota Rav4 with my Excursion. Both 2WD. Rav4 got 25MPG averaged over 60,000 miles, couldn't tow jack, carried 4 people if 2 were kids. If I had to carry more than 4 people or went to the store to get more than a few groceries or if I had to tow anything I had to get out the F250SD Ext. Cab anyway.

Excursion has averaged a little better than 14.5 mpg over 5,000 miles. That said, for every 1000 miles the Excursion takes an additional 29 gallons of gas. That translates to less than $0.10 per mile additional operating cost at $3.00/gal gas (29gal X $3.00 / 1000 miles). I think I can live with that.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 08:23 AM
  #27  
sddesigns's Avatar
sddesigns
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 111,873
Likes: 153
From: Wharton, NJ
FTE Emeritus
Originally Posted by JD-Iowa
Let's get a little perspective on this. We don't drive these things for economy purposes. Most of us bought them for the interior space and towing capacity.

I replaced a Toyota Rav4 with my Excursion. Both 2WD. Rav4 got 25MPG averaged over 60,000 miles, couldn't tow jack, carried 4 people if 2 were kids. If I had to carry more than 4 people or went to the store to get more than a few groceries or if I had to tow anything I had to get out the F250SD Ext. Cab anyway.

Excursion has averaged a little better than 14.5 mpg over 5,000 miles. That said, for every 1000 miles the Excursion takes an additional 29 gallons of gas. That translates to less than $0.10 per mile additional operating cost at $3.00/gal gas (29gal X $3.00 / 1000 miles). I think I can live with that.

X2, well stated!
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 08:17 PM
  #28  
motopsyko32's Avatar
motopsyko32
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by DRM
Not to be rude, but I have some serious doubts about the mileage claims some of you guys are making. If you guys have mileage records or excel spreadsheets - I'd love to see them. If you are using the overhead computer or just giving your guesstimate, no thanks.
my readings are from the overhead computer. But my mileage sucks ***!
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 08:24 PM
  #29  
motopsyko32's Avatar
motopsyko32
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
I also get my best mileage between 60 and 65 MPH. If i go 70 or above, its starts to suck even more ***
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
motopsyko32
Excursion - King of SUVs
33
Aug 7, 2013 01:14 PM
Excurvelle
Excursion - King of SUVs
18
Apr 15, 2012 06:42 AM
chmiller85
Excursion - King of SUVs
6
Jan 5, 2011 01:19 PM
Grand Canyon
Excursion - King of SUVs
8
Sep 17, 2006 07:09 PM
V10_X
Excursion - King of SUVs
3
Jun 27, 2005 12:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE