When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dudes... Let's take a closer look at the math. $1,500 worth of tires that go 50,000 miles = 3 cents per mile. DEF that costs $3/gallon and takes 5 gallons over 5000 miles = one third of a cent per mile. So... Tires = 3 center per mile and DEF = 3 miles per cent.
What the nay-sayers seem to miss is that whether the DEF is 3 cents a mile or 3 miles a cent, the lower EGR that it allows should contribute to better diesel fuel economy - which is one of the reasons why almost all diesel builders have chosen DEF. Diesel plus DEF should cost less per mile than diesel plus lots of EGR.
What the nay-sayers seem to miss is that whether the DEF is 3 cents a mile or 3 miles a cent, the lower EGR that it allows should contribute to better diesel fuel economy - which is one of the reasons why almost all diesel builders have chosen DEF. Diesel plus DEF should cost less per mile than diesel plus lots of EGR.
Another benefit of DEF is not having to repair plugged EGR's like many of the Dodges are dealing with.
Sorry about my math, I throw a dinger out there now and then.
At any rate, cost per mile is really low compared to tires and fuel.
And, MPG is supposed to be better (thanks kluger) so the cost should offset/cancel each other when compared to other modern diesels (don't argue the 7.3!)
And, MPG is supposed to be better (thanks kluger) so the cost should offset/cancel each other when compared to other modern diesels (don't argue the 7.3!)
And right there is the big unknown and the heart of the matter! Using DEF actually increases mileage and will clearly reduce maintenance costs due to less EGR usage. Whether DEF costs one-third of a cent or one cent, the savings in fuel and maintenance is greater. That would be some cool data to get a hold of.
Let me go out on a limb here and say that 5% of the total 18% improvement in mileage is due solely to DEF usage. Here's the math: a 5% improvement in mileage of a 2010 Super Duty that averaged say, 12 mpg means that the 2011 will now get 12.6 mpg. Over a 25,000 mile period assuming $3/gallon fuel the savings is 99 gallons or $297. Assuming DEF at $3/gallon you would spend $75. If those assumptions are correct, DEF saves $222/year. If DEF costs $10/gallon (which is crazy), you save $47 per year.
Regardless of the dollar cost/value of DEF, there are other benefits beyond the reduced EGR maintenance cost. Clearly there are environmental and health benefits as well. Bottom line, you're making money by using DEF (not much, but a little) and being a good citizen to others and mother earth as well.
Epic - thanks for mentioning the environmental benefits. As much as I love the roar of a well-tuned engine & the smell of diesel in the morning the fact that we can have horsepower & torque aplenty while still leaving things a little cleaner for our kids appeals to me. Does that mean I'm getting old?
Isn't promoting the environmental benefits of DEF a bit like promoting plug in electric vehicles without considering how the electricity was generated?
Like electricity, DEF doesn't just happen, it has to be produced, packaged and distributed.
Isn't promoting the environmental benefits of DEF a bit like promoting plug in electric vehicles without considering how the electricity was generated?
Like electricity, DEF doesn't just happen, it has to be produced, packaged and distributed.
Not to mention the energy and materials used to develop the DEF injection system installed on vehicles. DEF systems didn't just appear off the shelf. There was a cost to that when we bought the trucks. I'm sure Obama and the EPA thought all that through and decided it was worth it... (sarcasm) They know best you know... (double sarcasm)
Isn't promoting the environmental benefits of DEF a bit like promoting plug in electric vehicles without considering how the electricity was generated?
Like electricity, DEF doesn't just happen, it has to be produced, packaged and distributed.
I don't think I was promoting DEF as much as resigning myself to its use as a fact of life now. That said, if I have to use it, its at least nice to know that it has some benefits and won't cost me much if anything. As for it's production, urea is produced in huge quantities for the ag market and for SCR in stationary power plants. The over-the-road SCR urea usage (higher purity to keep that injector & catalyst clean) is expected to eventually reach a whole 2% of annual production, they probably spill that much each year. I think I'll go have a beer and make some of my own. Cheers
I was wondering if the DEF we buy is all the same. I always try to buy the best oil and filters for my truck and if there was a high quality DEF available I would be using it.
There isn't much to DEF - urea & de-ionized water. There's no additive package like in lubricating or fuel oils. Anything that meets the SAE requirements (and thus carries the SAE logo) should be pretty much the same. Plus its not going to go through the engine, only the SCR catalyst and the DPF.
What we do need to watch out for are storage tempertures. Time spent above 85F begins to reduce its 18 month storage life. Below 11F and it will start to freeze - that's why the truck uses exhaust heat to warm it up if it's cold out before it will start injecting it. If the urea starts to crystalize (freeze) it will plug the injector.
As has been mentioned, its been in use in europe, they call it AdBlue, for a few years and I'm not aware of any major problems with it there. Stick with a name brand, buy from a place that turns their inventory and if you do want to keep a jug or two around home, don't leave it outside. Since the computer gives plenty of warning before you run out, ~800 miles I think, I'll probably just purchase it as needed. I don't expect it to be a big deal.