Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

P401 Error - DPFE Changed but Not a Fix

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
mitch_c's Avatar
mitch_c
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: NE Indiana
Question P401 Error - DPFE Changed but Not a Fix

Got a 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0 Flex Fuel. Chk Engine light came on & P401 found.

After reading volumes of P401 Error posts, I checked the voltage output of the original DPFE... Per postings, KOEO Voltage should be .8 to 1 Volt.. Mine was 1.25, so I purchased a new one.

1 Day after installing and clearing codes, "BAM", the CEL was back.. Same code. AND VOLTAGE WAS 1.26 for the NEW DPFE !!!!!

I'm at a loss... Input voltage is 5.0, as is supposed to be.

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #2  
jk080's Avatar
jk080
Transmission Rebuilder
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 63
From: North Georgia
Club FTE Silver Member

P0401 Insufficient EGR Flow Detected
<table style="padding-left: 20px;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td style="padding-right: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 20px; width: 50%;" class="subsectionheader">Possible Causes</td><td style="padding-right: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px; width: 50%;" class="subsectionheader">
</td></tr><tr><td style="padding-right: 10px;" align="left" valign="top">
  • DPFE sensor signal circuit is shorted to ground
  • DPFE sensor reference (5v) circuit is open or shorted to ground
  • DPFE sensor downstream hose off or plugged
  • DPFE sensor hoses both off, loose or damaged
  • DPFE sensor hoses connected wrong (reversed)
  • EGR orifice tube is damaged or restricted
  • PCM has failed
</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Lots of possibilities for insufficient EGR flow.

Seeing as how the EGR feedback flow is low & the EGR valve is controlled by the computer through a vacuum switching valve that Ford calls a EVR, (Electronic Vacuum Regulator), that part of the system also belongs on your suspect list.

So, maybe also have a look at & test the EVR's diaphragm & it's vacuum line to the EGR valve & the EGR valves diaphragm for vacuum leaks.
If you don't have a vacuum tester, most autoparts stores have a "Mighty Vac" tester in their "Loan-A-tool" program, for a refundable deposit.

If the EVR diaphragm. or vacuum line between the two is dryrotted, cracked, split or doesn't fit tight at it's connection points & leaks controlling vacuum, the EGR valve will get a weak operating vacuum signal & misbehave.

Same if the EVR's internal switching valve sticks & doesn't open enough to apply full operating vacuum to the EGR valve.

If the EGR valves diaphragm is leaking vacuum, it'll not open properly & give insufficient EGR feedback flow.

If the controlling electrical signal the computer sends to the EVR is corrupt, that'll cause the EVR to act out & miscontrol the EGR valve.

And of course if the DPFE sensors output to the computer is corrupt, that'll cause the computer to miscontrol the EGR valve through the EVR.

So, make sure the EGR system vacuum lines are leak tight & the VSV & EGR diaphragms are able to hold a vacuum, then retest the electricals for the DPFE & EVR to make sure they're within range..

If you've been using the wrong service grade, or a low grade of oil, or wrong octane gas, or the engine consumes oil, or you have, or have had other engine managment problems & ignored them for a while, carbon in the EGR feedback orifice tube assy, carries a higher probability.

So check the EGR valves feedback orifice tube assy, to make sure none are clogged with carbon as that can affect the DPFE's PID feedback to the computer.

Along with inputs from the DPFE sensor, problems with the ECT sensor, TPS, MAF sensor, TCC system can also affect the EGR systems operation, it's all a vicious circle!!!!

SO, do you have any other trouble codes???? If so, post all of the code Numbers.

If all that checks out, it's possible "Murpheys Law" is messing with you & the new DPFE sensor is bad.

A whole bunch more thoughts for consideration.
Let us know what you find.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 11:15 AM
  #4  
mitch_c's Avatar
mitch_c
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: NE Indiana
Exclamation EVR

Well.. I'll have to pull the codes again. As for the EVR, that was replaced as well...

Was I incorrect in using the voltage check and results as a guide for replacment of the DPFE? Is the 1.25V reading acceptable and I therefore wasted the money purchasing a new one (and getting the same voltage reading)? Can someone validate that checking the voltage actually means something??

The mystical search continues.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #5  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Well, for instance if the EGR valves orifice tube assy is carboned up, it could cause the DPFE to put out a corrupt PID to the computer.

If any of the vacuum hoses to the DPFE sensor are compromised, leaking vacuum, or clogged up, that could mess with the PID it sends to the computer.

So there are a number of other things that can cause the DPFE sensor to output what ever signal it sends to the computer, so we have to take All of that into consideration when doing a trouble shoot.

The EGR system is a mature & rather rugged system, so In most cases, look for something simple, like a bad rubber vacuum line or loose fitting, or carbon build up in the EGR orifice tube assy, or maybe a leaky EGR or EVR diaphragm or vacuum line.

Seeing as how the EVR has been replaced I suppose it's kinda low on your suspect list, but with Murpheys Law being what it is, I wouldn't take it off the list yet!!!!

Get a vacuum tester & check the EGR & EVR diaphragms to make sure they're holding vacuum & that the interconnecting vacuum line is holding vacuum.

The DPFE voltage you posted was measured under what operating conditions?????
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #6  
mitch_c's Avatar
mitch_c
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: NE Indiana
Voltage was checked with "KEY ON, ENGINE OFF" as the process I found specified.

The 1.25V I got didn't match any of the 2 voltage ranges listied, as both were 1volt or less (3.0L or 4.0L). Mine is a 3.0L Flex Fuel (1999).. Is 1.25V acceptable for this engine??



I'll try to get the codes read sometime today and post any additional ones.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #7  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
I'm still not clear on how, where, or what DPFE voltage your measuing.

Is it the Sig Return, or V-Ref voltage that your measuring & are you doing it by back probing with the DPFE connected????

Disconnect the DPFE electrical connector, check V-Ref at KOEO, it should be between 4.0-6.0 volts, IF the battery voltage isn't low & the PCM isn't acting out.

The PID the DPFE sends to the computer will vary, depending on the engine temp & what we're asking the engine to do. So a change in exhaust pressure & intake vacuum, will change the DPFE's PID to the computer.

Your problem isn't that the EGR valve doesn't work at all, just that EGR flow is low, so the system is working, just not providing enough EGR flow for some reason.

BTW, the new EVR regulators coil resistance should be between 30 & 70 ohms.

So, do you have any spark knock/engine ping while driving????
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 03:19 PM
  #8  
mitch_c's Avatar
mitch_c
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: NE Indiana
AH... Doc I had said with DPFE electrical connector CONNECTED, check DPFE Signal with KOEO, it should be approx .45V plus or minus .25V for 3.0L.. My original DPFE was Aluminum, the new one is plastic... Both read in the 1.25V range.

So I hope you understand why I'm totally Confused..

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #9  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
I understand your confusion & you can help us help you unravel your mystery P0401 code if you'll measure & post the systems V-Ref voltage as I outlined above, when you post any additional trouble codes you may have.

If the V-Ref voltage to the DPFE sensor is out of tolerance, the DPFE sensor will likely put out an out of tolerance PID signal reurn value to the computer, so right now we don't know why your getting the DPFE signal return reading/s you've posted.

Could be that both the old & new DPFE sensors are bad, or maybe their both ok, but are being fed an out of toleance V-Ref voltage!!!!

Is the DPFE test document you refer too, the one in this forums "Tech Info" thread????

The root cause problem would be much easier to find if you had an outright failure of something, but as it is, the system is working, but not quiet like it should & a number of things could be invoved.

So make sure the basics are fuctional, like the V-Ref voltage to the DPFE sensor, the vacuum control system is leak tight, then move to more detailed system tests like resistance measurements of the EVR solenoid coil & voltage checks on what the computer is sending to the EVR & inspection of the EGR valves orifice tube assy deposits & if any of those orifices are clogged with carbon deposits.

Keep us posted on your findings.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #10  
mitch_c's Avatar
mitch_c
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: NE Indiana
Unhappy P401 Chk Engine Light Prob (Continued)

Sorry for the big lapse in time since I started this thread..

Well.... As requested, I checked the V-REF voltage with KOEO and DPFE disconnected.. 4.99V

Also, have replaced the vacuum lines connected the EGR and Exhaust Tube, EGR, and the tube from exhaust to EGR.

Cleared the error, drove it home, and the next day while driving back into town... you guessed... CEL popped back on..

Where to next???
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 06:21 PM
  #11  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
OK, good feedback on the DPFE Ref voltage, it's right where it should be, between 4-6 volts.

Now check the EGR systems EVR/vacuum switching valve coil resistance. It should be between 30 - 70 ohms & post what you get.

If the EVR checks ok, then disconnect it's vacuum line that runs over to the EGR valve & apply 5-6 inches of vacuum to it & see if it'll hold vacuum, it should if the vacuum line is good & the EGR diaphragm is ok. The EGR valve should move open too.

If that checks out ok, connect a piece of vacuum tubing to the EVR, where you have the EGR vacuum line disconnected & try to blow back through it. You shouldn't be able to if it's workng right.

If thats ok, disconnect the EVR's electrical connector, ground one pin & apply B+ to the other one & see if you can blow through it. You should be able to if it's working properly.

If thats ok, turn the ignition to KOEO & check the EVR's electrical connector for B+ & post the voltage you get.

If thats ok, you'll need a scope & breakout pigtail to measure the duty cycle of the pulse width of the voltage signal the computer is sending to the EVR, to see if it's pulse width is changing/getting wider, as it should when the system is calling for more EGR.

If thats ok, & you know the EGR orifice is clear of carbon, suspect the new DPFE sensor has a probem.

A whole buch more thoughts for consideration. Let us know how your trouble shoot goes.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 11:43 PM
  #12  
KhanTyranitar's Avatar
KhanTyranitar
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 7
If you put in an aftermarket DPFE, you need not search any further. It is very common for the light to come back on when a cheap aftermarket unit is used.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #13  
mitch_c's Avatar
mitch_c
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: NE Indiana
P401 Continues

Oh, I forgot to post that the EVR has also been replaced..

In response to KhanTyranitar... I've put both a new DPFE and a DPFE off of a fully functional vehicle having no problems..... same results.

I've also swapped out the vacuum lines to the EVR... (I have a complete 3.0L from a 98 Ranger that had no problems, but the owner wanted an engine from an ARCA car and 5 speed installed).. I've got the DPFE from this motor, (and a perfect 48K mile 1996 Taurus I inherited that runs like a clock.. I can take the DPFE off it as well), if necessary...my thought process was "if it didn't shoot codes, the part should be functional..

I'll see what I can find while following the troubleshooting process that pawpaw posted..

PawPaw....Any other places or things to check, if my logic that the parts swapping I've done is solid, and the vacuum tests show nothing????
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Do the above tests, post the results & lets see what they suggest you should do next.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 05:40 PM
  #15  
ibanguitar's Avatar
ibanguitar
New User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
DPFE info

try DPFE2 not DPFE15. The older 1991-1999 require .5v ref. Most of the newer DPFE's (DPFE15) that say they replace the older ones are actually out of tolerance or very close at "key on". If their output is over 1 volt at "key on" they will more than likely cause a CEL in a 1991-1999 ford egr system
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spooktn
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
5
Aug 15, 2017 08:18 AM
Stroked99
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
6
Oct 10, 2016 03:08 PM
dwimood
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
Nov 22, 2011 02:20 PM
deejdeej
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
4
Jun 10, 2010 09:51 PM
marklar65
1997 - 2003 F150
0
Feb 13, 2010 05:44 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE