1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Go to Fuel Injecton or stay carb?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:53 PM
Redneck1465's Avatar
Redneck1465
Redneck1465 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can put new into old I am not worried about that and that cats are not an issue because the 85 has cats. I was just wondering if the wiring and such would be easier if the 90 EFI was emissions free. They do not do an under the hood inspection all they do is sniff the tailpipe.
 
  #17  
Old 06-24-2010, 10:12 AM
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
LARIAT 85 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Shark Racer
The adaptability and combustion control are why cars leave the factory with EFI.
...and don't forget EMISSIONS. Since EFI is constantly self-tuning itself for optimum economy and emissions, they tend to run cleaner without the owner having to do anything about it. In the past, most people didn't take the time to properly tune their vehicle for changing conditions, and that is a big reason older carbureted vehicles were considered "dirty."

Originally Posted by Shark Racer
You misinterpreted me and even then, didn't quite give correct advice. You're not tuning to just an engine - you're tuning to an engine, a transmission, a car, an elevation, a fuel type, etc.
Your splitting hairs here, Chief. I think you knew what I meant. But yes, you are correct if you want to get 100% technical about it.

Originally Posted by Shark Racer
EFI isn't as scary as you think it is. If you can swap gears in a rear axle and wire up an aftermarket tach, you can deduce what's going on with an EFI system.
I don't think EFI is really all that "scary." Between my wife and I, we have four vehicles between us and only my F150 is carbureted. I would never switch out a perfectly good EFI system in favor of a carburetor. What I have learned is that with the right tuning, a carbureted vehicle can run just as good as any modern vehicle, PROVIDED you understand what a carburetor can and can't do without input from YOU.

Swapping gears in a rear axle is nowhere NEAR as easy as wiring up an aftermarket tach! Properly changing gears is an art all by itself; it is very easy to ruin expensive gear sets if not set properly, not to mention the labor involved is much more than wiring up an aftermarket tach. There are a lot of old timers who cut their teeth on carburetors who can wire up an aftermarket tach all day long, but scratch their heads when it comes to modern electronic fuel injection.

Changing the subject a little...
Since it sounds as if you have been around a lot longer than I have, and was driving vehicles before I was old enough to know, what was/is your opinion of the once state-of-the-art "feedback" carburetors that shared characteristics of carburetors AND electronic fuel injection that were common in the mid 1980s, and that was once on my own 1985 F150?
 
  #18  
Old 06-24-2010, 01:18 PM
Shark Racer's Avatar
Shark Racer
Shark Racer is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85
...and don't forget EMISSIONS. Since EFI is constantly self-tuning itself for optimum economy and emissions, they tend to run cleaner without the owner having to do anything about it. In the past, most people didn't take the time to properly tune their vehicle for changing conditions, and that is a big reason older carbureted vehicles were considered "dirty."
When running closed-loop, there is no need to re-tune modern EFI systems. They run closed loop 99% of the time, outside of competition scenarios.

This 99% scenario is where a carburetor will have to be retuned; there is some adaptability via the air-bleeds and other systems, but nowhere near as much as EFI.



I don't think EFI is really all that "scary." Between my wife and I, we have four vehicles between us and only my F150 is carbureted. I would never switch out a perfectly good EFI system in favor of a carburetor.
Why did you post about being forced to take your car to a technician then? There are plenty of EFI solutions that are easily troubleshooted by the home mechanic.

What I have learned is that with the right tuning, a carbureted vehicle can run just as good as any modern vehicle, PROVIDED you understand what a carburetor can and can't do without input from YOU.
I don't disagree with this.

Swapping gears in a rear axle is nowhere NEAR as easy as wiring up an aftermarket tach! Properly changing gears is an art all by itself; it is very easy to ruin expensive gear sets if not set properly, not to mention the labor involved is much more than wiring up an aftermarket tach. There are a lot of old timers who cut their teeth on carburetors who can wire up an aftermarket tach all day long, but scratch their heads when it comes to modern electronic fuel injection.
I never said that wiring an aftermarket tach and changing a gear-set were equivalent abilities. I said if one was capable of doing both, they should have the capability to maintain an EFI system. Probably more apt to say that if you have the ability to wire a tach and change a headgasket, as keeping EFI running is nowhere near as difficult as swapping a gearset.


Changing the subject a little...
Since it sounds as if you have been around a lot longer than I have, and was driving vehicles before I was old enough to know, what was/is your opinion of the once state-of-the-art "feedback" carburetors that shared characteristics of carburetors AND electronic fuel injection that were common in the mid 1980s, and that was once on my own 1985 F150?
I did own an 80 Corvette for a short period of time with the Rochester CCC q-jet. (Computer Command Control, I believe. and I may have been mistaken on the model of carb my 78 'vette has, it was most likely an M4MC. My memory coming back is telling me the E4MC was the CCC q-jet...)

Anyhow.

I think feedback carburetors were a decent "bridge" design between carburetion and injection, but were limited by the technology of the time and also still had many of the limitations presented by carburetors. (obviously)

The CCC was basically a regular Quadrajet with computer controlled primary jets. The secondary operation was completely mechanical. I never had an opportunity to drive the 80 'vette to elevation but I'd bet it would have had slightly better off-idle response.

The biggest issue with carbs is the fact that mixture flow depends primarily on vacuum signal from the motor and no other input factors.
 
  #19  
Old 06-24-2010, 02:22 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,951
Likes: 0
Received 979 Likes on 773 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneck1465
I was just wondering if the wiring and such would be easier if the 90 EFI was emissions free.
The engine wiring harness on a '90 is almost completely seperate from the rest of the vehicle.. the exceptions are power and ground and the check engine light, and since you have a donor vehicle right there this won't be too hard and should not cost you anything. The '90 also has a much simpler fuel system than your '85.. just a high pressure pump in the tank and two lines up to the motor.. no selector valve or booster pump on the frame, so I'd also suggest you move that over. The emissions system(air injection)on this motor does not affect engine operation so most of it can be deleted, that includes the air pump and all the plumbing and valves on top of the motor and those that run down to the exhaust. To avoid computer codes you just need to retain the TAB and TAD solenoids mounted next to the coil and keep them electrically connected. I'd also suggest you ditch the complete stock exhaust system and install shorty headers and an aftermarket Y pipe, doing so will really wake the motor up.
 
  #20  
Old 06-25-2010, 12:20 AM
Redneck1465's Avatar
Redneck1465
Redneck1465 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Conanski if I have any questions when I go to try and install this on my truck can I PM you for some help?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeffp8
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
09-14-2015 04:17 PM
Jagesage
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
08-13-2015 02:59 PM
Canus
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
12-07-2014 09:39 AM
Mister_King
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
11-20-2014 11:17 AM
k-mann10
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
05-15-2014 07:09 PM



Quick Reply: Go to Fuel Injecton or stay carb?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.