Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

203* stat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 09:16 PM
  #61  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by ernesteugene

I was going to that analysis on my turbo thread ...but due to a resounding lack of interest that thread was put on the back burner ...after I get caught up on my engine-wear thread I'll do the with/without IC analysis!
I'm interested....

What about me?

Screw the engine wear thread, too many variables and opinions to make headway anyways.






 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 09:45 PM
  #62  
driximus's Avatar
driximus
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, Wa
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by clux
Everything I've ever seen from Ford says 235 for the auto, 250 for the manual transmission. But I guess Ford's probably wrong about that too.

Sticker on my engine says 250hp im pretty sure they didnt botch the sticker.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #63  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by driximus
Sticker on my engine says 250hp im pretty sure they didnt botch the sticker.
That is correct, they increased the horsepower in 2001MY, which I clearly stated in post #31, so I'm pretty sure they didn't botch the sticker either.

My 2000 sticker says 235.

On edit: I take that back. Apparently they did botch the sticker, at least according to dieselmann's site:


"In 1997 the horsepower was increased to 225 and the torque was increased to 480 ft/lbs.
Early 99 valve cover stickers were incorrect showing 250 HP. The engine was actually rated at 235 HP with all accessories installed.
The engines did develop 250 HP and 505 ft/lbs torque for automatic transmission and 275 HP and 520 ft/lbs torque for manual transmission in October 2000.
Engines with automatic transmissions were increased to 525 ft/lbs torque after January 02."

PowerStroke Horsepower and Torque
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:01 PM
  #64  
driximus's Avatar
driximus
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, Wa
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by clux
That is correct, they increased the horsepower in 2001, which I clearly stated in post #31, so I'm pretty sure they didn't botch the sticker either.

My 2000 sticker says 235.

On edit: I take that back. Apparently they did botch the sticker, at least according to dieselmann's site:


"In 1997 the horsepower was increased to 225 and the torque was increased to 480 ft/lbs.
Early 99 valve cover stickers were incorrect showing 250 HP. The engine was actually rated at 235 HP with all accessories installed.
The engines did develop 250 HP and 505 ft/lbs torque for automatic transmission and 275 HP and 520 ft/lbs torque for manual transmission in October 2000.
Engines with automatic transmissions were increased to 525 ft/lbs torque after January 02."
PowerStroke Horsepower and Torque
I take it back as well they did botch the sticker LOL
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #65  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...e-concept.html

For anyone interested in me blowing more hot air.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 10:30 PM
  #66  
DocB's Avatar
DocB
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 2
I'm running a 203* thermostat.
My housing was getting rusty and needed changing so I did them at the same time.
My research at that time showed that the 203* put the engine into a more ideal operating temp and did not at all effect the longevity. Sources included IH, multiple engine builders, multple Ford diesel mechanics and other diesel mechanics. So I went with it.
I do not have any hard data to prove one way or the other.
I did not know any Ford engineers at the time, but I will inquire now as this subject has got me to thinking.
The answer to the question as to why OEM uses a 195* Tstat was an emphatic emmisions only issue.
I always thought it was silly to burn more fuel to emit less pollution, read short term at the tail pipe.
BTW-I get 21.8 MPG and that's with worn tires. The new ones added about an inch in height so we'll see if we can break the 22 mark this summer.
Show me hard data and I'll switch it out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #67  
Supercab's Avatar
Supercab
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,373
Likes: 46
From: Palm Bay, Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

Anybody contacted Bob at Dieselsite to let him know about this descussion?
I'd be curious as to HIS take now some years after he sold the 203s to lots of us.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #68  
Action4478's Avatar
Action4478
Hotshot
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,764
Likes: 39
Originally Posted by Supercab
Anybody contacted Bob at Dieselsite to let him know about this descussion?
I'd be curious as to HIS take now some years after he sold the 203s to lots of us.
...Done......
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 12:23 AM
  #69  
DIESELSITE's Avatar
DIESELSITE
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
To start: A thermostat regulates MINIMUM operating temperatures. A Radiator regulates MAXIMUM operating temperatures.

Originally Posted by ernesteugene
and by using a 203*F stat you also give up a significant amount of coolant reserve heat capacity that might come in handy when towing long grades in the summer!
If you have to rely on reserve, God help you if the hill is too long. That's like saying we need to rely on the battery reserve to keep our lights on.

Originally Posted by ernesteugene
Will switching to a 203* stat guarantee that the temperature of the upper portion of the cylinder liner will never increase by more than 8*F?

A thermostat regulates MINIMUM operating temperatures. A Radiator regulates MAXIMUM operating temperatures. An F550 runs the SAME temperature pulling his 36’ tow hauler with a 192 and a 203. However, when the same truck is empty, he willl run hotter with the 203 than the 192, IOWs, he will run closer to his loaded temperatures.

A thermostat regulates MINIMUM operating temperatures. A Radiator regulates MAXIMUM operating temperatures.

It’s really that simple. There have got to be 3 million 444E/PSDs running around this country with 203 thermostats in them, whether from the factory, or from Dieselsite. There’s nothing to be scared of, nothing to be confused about, and posts about the thermostat causing overheating are downright false.



Originally Posted by clux
So those 94, 95, and 96 powerstrokes with no intercooler, a smaller radiator, and the 203* ought to start dropping like flies any day now, right?
And all those International trucks that do WAAAAY more real work than most all of us.



Originally Posted by CSIPSD
Pulled my 203 stat and threw it in the trash... it was junk.
How did it not perform? One of my best selling products. I get one to two calls a year having an issue with it not closing. I send them a new one and never hear back. There are tens of thousand of our 203 thermostats out there. I run it in all of my 7.3s and have for longer than anyone on these boards, since I ran it in my own truck for testing before I started selling them. Has anyone heard of any of these terrible theoretical conclusions becoming a reality? I certainly haven't, or I wouldn't be selling it. If I had a problem with any item, it wouldn't be on my site.


Originally Posted by ernesteugene
...so I'd like to see your analysis that using a 203*F stat won't shorten the engine's like expectancy.
Already been done. 444E and OBS trucks. Now show us analysis that using a 203*F stat WILL shorten the engine's life expectancy.

Here's the engineer's paper concerning and applied to this exact engine. This is not theory. He used the 203 thermostat for the research: https://www.dieselsite.com/pdffiles/...nginetemps.pdf

And for those that think they have to take the thermostat out before the weather warms up.
A thermostat regulates MINIMUM operating temperatures. A Radiator regulates MAXIMUM operating temperatures.

Does that make sense to anyone? Dig your thermostat out of the garbage and call the manufacturer if you have any questions. Dieselsite has always sold proven items.

Recent article in 8-Lug Mag. https://www.dieselsite.com/pdffiles/...0dec098lug.pdf

Here's a link to one of my best selling products year after year after year.... https://www.dieselsite.com/index.asp...ROD&ProdID=186


I feel so bad when people get confused reading these boards. They are on here looking for help, and so many don't know what to believe or not to believe. I try to put as much information on my website as I can. You can always look there for information on my products. You can also be sure that I would not sell something that would hurt your truck. I still have and always will have my 1st Powerstroke and know first hand how much your truck means to you.


Bob

 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 02:21 AM
  #70  
lostmybeer's Avatar
lostmybeer
Have a nice Beer!!!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,024
Likes: 1
From: WA Resident
Thank You Bob
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 02:29 AM
  #71  
twags6's Avatar
twags6
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 5
From: Slatington, PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Thanks Bob! I'm putting your t-stat in after my next oil change. My plan is to have 3 UOA's on the factory t-stat and 3 on your t-stat. The factory one is on its way out and doesn't close completely (engine never gets up to full temp even in the 50's).
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 04:37 AM
  #72  
Supercab's Avatar
Supercab
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,373
Likes: 46
From: Palm Bay, Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

Yes, Thanks Bob!! I for one have faith in you and your product!! also wanted to say that the great coolant filter setup you sold me has been mistaken for a factory install its so nice!
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 06:03 AM
  #73  
bfife's Avatar
bfife
still plays with trucks
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 3
From: Twin Falls Idaho
Club FTE Silver Member

Thanks Bob! I've always maintained exactly what you said. Tstat only controls how fast the engine warms up not how hot it gets. I've run the 203 in both my PSD's and you know how hard I work mine. just a little truck and 5th wheel.

Barney
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #74  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
***************crickets********************
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 07:45 AM
  #75  
MADVAN's Avatar
MADVAN
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Levittown
On average a full closed t-stat, "after it has opened" is 15*F (average).

203* is about 188*
192/195* is about 177*/180*

Closing temp is as important as opening temp.
A t-stat is a throttle valve for the coolant.

Bill
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE