Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

203* stat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #31  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by ernesteugene
Due to their lower FWHP those OBS engines rejected much less heat into their coolant compared to a late 99.5 truck! The graph below compares the 97 OBS truck to my E99 235 FWHP truck ...and a 99.5 auto is rated for 250 FWHP and the manual for 275 FWHP! ...and just because some of the OBS trucks haven't worn out yet doesn't dispute the "scientific fact" that higher temperatures cause higher wear rates!
The OBS pickups were 215hp from the factory, my 2000 is 20 horsepower more that that at 235. I don't know where you're getting the 250 for a 99.5 but that didn't happen until 2001. Regardless of that fact, I guess we can only expect the OBS trucks that are chipped to start dropping like files any day now because of too much heat, is that correct?

It's also a scientific fact that too low of temperature may cause accelerated wear rates, but you don't want to talk about that now I'll bet.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #32  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by ernesteugene
By not having an intercooler ...which blocks and heats the airflow going to the radiator on a 99.5 truck ...the OBS truck was better configured for running cooler!
So if I take my intercooler off, my egt's will be cooler and I'm ok to install a 203*?
Is that scientific fact?
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 05:17 PM
  #33  
bfife's Avatar
bfife
still plays with trucks
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 3
From: Twin Falls Idaho
Club FTE Silver Member

Talking to Eugene is like

love you!

Barney
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #34  
MADVAN's Avatar
MADVAN
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Levittown
Originally Posted by ernesteugene

I think you need to recheck you're "math" or your "logic" or both ...because as I "correctly" stated a "60*C increase" in temperature is in fact a "108*F increase" in temperature!

As I also previously stated ...the temperature in question is the TRR temperature of the upper portion of the cylinder liner within an inch or so of TDC ...not the coolant temperature!

..."To avoid scuffing of the ring and liner typical TRR temperatures in diesel engines are kept near 200*C by circulating coolant through the cylinder head. Tests conducted at 260*C have shown that the rings and liners experience wear at least 100 times greater than at conventional TRR temperatures."...

So the baseline "TRR temperature" was ...200*C=392*F ...and the elevated "TRR temperature" that was tested for increased wear rate was ...260*C=500*F ...and the difference between the baseline and the elevated temperature was ...500*F-392*F=108*F!
I read it as +60*c to an unknown base temp. I did not use the 200*C as a base. So my math and logic is correct as well as yours. 60*C = 140*F.
200*C to 260*C is a 108*F swing.

Originally Posted by ernesteugene
So the baseline "TRR temperature" was ...200*C=392*F
What is the TRR on a powerstroke? (80% Full load)
What is the exhaust to coolant ratio in a stock tuned powerstroke?(80% Full load)
What is the % of energy converted into heat in the psd?

My .02 is its more about egt control.
TRR has more to do with load and fuel.
The psd is dam efficient. To cold is as bad as to hot.(coolant)

Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #35  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by MADVAN
...
What is the TRR on a powerstroke? (80% Full load)
What is the exhaust to coolant ratio in a stock tuned powerstroke?(80% Full load)
What is the % of energy converted into heat in the psd?
Bill
I was just passing along some sound advice on stats ...and I see that several agree with me! Some of the other issues you raise will be covered here... https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...tock-7-3l.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #36  
MADVAN's Avatar
MADVAN
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Levittown
Originally Posted by ernesteugene
I see that several agree with me!
Agree with what?
At 260*C the wear comes from a lube problem!
The temp has surpassed the flashpoint of most lubes.
All though the flashpoint might rise with pressure. (unknown)
Just cannot see how your statement of remove your 203 stat and your top ring
will be happy. This opposed to a 195 stat.

.02
Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #37  
Supercab's Avatar
Supercab
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,373
Likes: 46
From: Palm Bay, Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

I remember just over 2 years ago when I had just bought my late '99 all the talk about switching to the DIESELSITE 203* Tstat and their billet housing which I did and really haven't noticed any change in how my engine runs or a difference in coolant temp.
So, IF we want to now return to a "stock" Tstat which temp do we need to seek out? the 192* or 195*?? what came in it originally?? what brand should we get? Ford?
I sure don't want to "damage" my engine!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:54 PM
  #38  
Action4478's Avatar
Action4478
Hotshot
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,764
Likes: 39
Originally Posted by Supercab
I remember just over 2 years ago when I had just bought my late '99 all the talk about switching to the DIESELSITE 203* Tstat and their billet housing which I did and really haven't noticed any change in how my engine runs or a difference in coolant temp.
So, IF we want to now return to a "stock" Tstat which temp do we need to seek out? the 192* or 195*?? what came in it originally?? what brand should we get? Ford?
I sure don't want to "damage" my engine!!
Stick with the 203 ,.... won't hurt it a bit , may get better mileage
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 06:51 PM
  #39  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by MADVAN
...Agree with what? ...Bill
Well let's review the bidding... I said...

Originally Posted by ernesteugene
The next time you have it apart to fix the leak I suggest reinstalling the OEM thermostat...your top compression rings will say "thank you" and they'll reward you by not wearing out as quickly as they otherwise would with the hotter 203* stat installed!
...and then these were posted...

Originally Posted by driximus
I had heard some bad scooby stuff about the 203 stat some time ago. I decided to stick with the stocker. When I heard this a couple years ago there were alot of Neigh sayers.

Originally Posted by big poppa
Subscribing also, I've been told by numerous folks here to switchout my 203* and when the weather gets a little warmer I will. Also, Ford just came out with, not to long ago a new stock 192* temp. stat. I wonder whats the story on that, maybe Gene can enlighten us...
..which to me sounds like agreement with my advice!


Originally Posted by MADVAN
...Just cannot see how your statement of remove your 203 stat and your top ring
will be happy. This opposed to a 195 stat.
.02
Bill
If you go from a stock 192*F/195*F stat to a 203*F stat how many more crankshaft degrees per revolution does the piston spend in the wear-inducing regime of mixed or boundary lubrication? What effect does the temperature increase have on abrasive wear ...and on corrosive wear? Well keep reading my engine-wear thread because I'll be trying to figure out the answers to these and many other questions as well!

Originally Posted by Action4478
Stick with the 203 ,.... won't hurt it a bit , may get better mileage
As a general principle ...I think that anyone who advises members to modify the OEM Ford design also has a burden of proof to justify that their suggested mod isn't harmful to the long term like expectancy of the engine ...so I'd like to see your analysis that using a 203*F stat won't shorten the engine's like expectancy.

For what it's worth ...the normal coolant temperature as specified by Cat for my 7.2L C7 is between 180*F and 205*F ...and at 205*F the ECM activates the air-clutch and turns on a huge radiator fan which quickly reduces the temperature below 200*F. Cat is so concerned with a hot running engine that if the temperature somehow manages to reach 215*F the ECM de-rates the fueling until the temperature is below 205*F again ...and if the de-rate is ineffective and the temperature keeps increasing past 215*F the ECM gives a warning to pull to the side of the road ...and the ECM shuts off the engine! Cat also uses 2 thermostats in parallel to guard against running hot and recommends that they be replaced every 3 years even if no overheating has been encountered.

The paper work from when I changed my C7 stats is buried somewhere in the truck ...and when I did a search all I could find were comments like below ...which tells me these engines should'nt be run any hotter than is necessary...

I have a Silverleaf engine monitor which is much more accurate that the dash gauge and my C7 quickly reaches 180 degrees and then ranges between 180 and 190.

My C-7 runs at 195.

I have a 400 Cummins that runs at 185 all day long. On a hill climb on a hot day ( climbing from Phoenix to Flagstaff ) it will only come up 5 degrees.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #40  
CSIPSD's Avatar
CSIPSD
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 2
From: Bend, OR
Pulled my 203 stat and threw it in the trash... it was junk.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #41  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
I always wondered what would happen if you ran lower temps and thinner oil.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:06 PM
  #42  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
Eugene;

What are you're thoughts on heating intake air from exhaust pipe and switching to normal intercooled air once it hits 2-5 lbs of boost?

I'm thinking it might help to warm up, and combust fuel better while driving lightly......
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #43  
MADVAN's Avatar
MADVAN
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Levittown
Originally Posted by ernesteugene
Well let's review the bidding...
I said......and then these were posted...
..which to me sounds like agreement with my advice!.
Coke or pepsi.


Originally Posted by ernesteugene
If you go from a stock 192*F/195*F stat to a 203*F stat how many more crankshaft degrees per revolution does the piston spend in the wear-inducing regime of mixed or boundary lubrication? What effect does the temperature increase have on abrasive wear ...and on corrosive wear? Well keep reading my engine-wear thread because I'll be trying to figure out the answers to these and many other questions as well!.
The reduction of the T-Stat's opening temp in the psd was done for emission reasons!

You have your work cutout for you!
Pressures and temps are allways changing in the bore along with rpm's
per mile of the piston.
It also has to do with how quick the coolant can absorb heat from the
cylinder wall. Example: 50% water and 50% ethylene glycol vrs 60% water
and 40% ethylene glycol. The 60/40 is more efficient at extracting the heat
from the cylinder. 100% water beats them both! NPG is another route.


Originally Posted by ernesteugene
As a general principle ...I think that anyone who advises members to modify the OEM Ford design also has a burden of proof to justify that their suggested mod isn't harmful to the long term like expectancy of the engine ...so I'd like to see your analysis that using a 203*F stat won't shorten the engine's like expectancy.

For what it's worth ...the normal coolant temperature as specified by Cat for my 7.2L C7 is between 180*F and 205*F ...and at 205*F the ECM activates the air-clutch and turns on a huge radiator fan which quickly reduces the temperature below 200*F. Cat is so concerned with a hot running engine that if the temperature somehow manages to reach 215*F the ECM de-rates the fueling until the temperature is below 205*F again ...and if the de-rate is ineffective and the temperature keeps increasing past 215*F the ECM gives a warning to pull to the side of the road ...and the ECM shuts off the engine! Cat also uses 2 thermostats in parallel to guard against running hot and recommends that they be replaced every 3 years even if no overheating has been encountered.

The paper work from when I changed my C7 stats is buried somewhere in the truck ...and when I did a search all I could find were comments like below ...which tells me these engines should'nt be run any hotter than is necessary...

I have a Silverleaf engine monitor which is much more accurate that the dash gauge and my C7 quickly reaches 180 degrees and then ranges between 180 and 190.

My C-7 runs at 195.

I have a 400 Cummins that runs at 185 all day long. On a hill climb on a hot day ( climbing from Phoenix to Flagstaff ) it will only come up 5 degrees.
Its not apples to apples here with a C7!
The C7 has forged steel pistons (2 piece welded) and thin rings!
Its a ACERT T emission reduction motor.
Completely different animal to a powerstroke.

Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 11:37 PM
  #44  
twags6's Avatar
twags6
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 5
From: Slatington, PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Supercab
I remember just over 2 years ago when I had just bought my late '99 all the talk about switching to the DIESELSITE 203* Tstat and their billet housing which I did and really haven't noticed any change in how my engine runs or a difference in coolant temp.
So, IF we want to now return to a "stock" Tstat which temp do we need to seek out? the 192* or 195*?? what came in it originally?? what brand should we get? Ford?
I sure don't want to "damage" my engine!!
This is what i've been asking for a while too. What temp thermostat was the engine DESIGNED for??? I've also read that ford put the 195 in there for emissions reasons, which makes sense. Lower combustion temps means lower NOx, but less efficient fuel burn.

Who knows what temp it was designed to have in it??
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 08:55 AM
  #45  
MADVAN's Avatar
MADVAN
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Levittown
The tune on a T444e is not the same as the PSD.
It produces less hp/tq, and peak rpm is less.

Besides the emission reason for the change of the stat was
the start of the diesel hp/tq wars. It was the old run it cooler
so you can extract more power from it. This reduces its lifespan.

Bill
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE