Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

boost gauge hook up?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 09:44 AM
  #1  
johnd7854's Avatar
johnd7854
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
boost gauge hook up?

hey guys i have 2001 7.3 power stroke super duty and tring to hook up isspro boost gauge, were on motor does the connection go, any pics would help.if thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #2  
guzzle92's Avatar
guzzle92
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 1
From: Northern Colorado
Clay at RiffRaff Diesel Performance has a great little fitting to eliminate the Air Intake Heater and at the same time, gives you a 1/8" NPT opening to hook the boost gauge to. It is a much better place to sense boost than simply splicing into the MAP sensor line.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #3  
just another truck's Avatar
just another truck
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,499
Likes: 10
From: Sterling Heights,Mi
Sorry, no pictures, but running from the passenger side of your truck there is a red hose, it is a the MAP sensor line, this is what you need to tap into. Mean while, I will look for a link.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #4  
just another truck's Avatar
just another truck
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,499
Likes: 10
From: Sterling Heights,Mi
Gauge Installations at DieselManor- 1999-2003 7.3L Powerstroke

Sorry it took so long.

Bob, I have read, and re read, I believe, everything on this I can.. It doesnt seem to make a difference if you remove the AIH, or does it?
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #5  
big poppa's Avatar
big poppa
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,977
Likes: 5
From: Lancaster, Pa.
Here yaa go, got it Pat. I installed my boost fitting with Clay's AIH delete like Guzzle said, nice clean install. With the stock Air Intake Heater element removed
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
just another truck's Avatar
just another truck
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,499
Likes: 10
From: Sterling Heights,Mi
By the way, if you have the tools, the plug is nothing more then a Cummings Oil Drain plug.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 10:15 AM
  #7  
johnd7854's Avatar
johnd7854
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
so i don't need the heater
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #8  
guzzle92's Avatar
guzzle92
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 1
From: Northern Colorado
Originally Posted by just another truck
Bob, I have read, and re read, I believe, everything on this I can.. It doesnt seem to make a difference if you remove the AIH, or does it?
There are arguments as to whether or not the AIH is much of a restriction on the air intake or not. I am one that does not think it does.

What does make a difference is where the boost gauge is sensing true boost. The closer that you can get to the intake plenum, the better. The AIH hole is just a handy place to do it without pulling the spider and tapping it and most that have eliminated the AIH have found that it is a pretty useless item on the truck.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 11:08 AM
  #9  
johnd7854's Avatar
johnd7854
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
ok guys i talked to clay and bought it and thanks alot for info.....
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #10  
renyren's Avatar
renyren
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Mountain House, CA
I also bought the delete plug from Clay, it made the install much easier and cleaner.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 06:58 PM
  #11  
Riffraff Diesel's Avatar
Riffraff Diesel
PREMIUM SPONSOR
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,038
Likes: 73
Originally Posted by just another truck
By the way, if you have the tools, the plug is nothing more then a Cummings Oil Drain plug.
The hard thing on the drain plug is drilling and tapping it. Been there and had fun trying
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #12  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by just another truck
...Bob, I have read, and re read, I believe, everything on this I can.. It doesnt seem to make a difference if you remove the AIH, or does it?...
Originally Posted by guzzle92
...There are arguments as to whether or not the AIH is much of a restriction on the air intake or not. I am one that does not think it does...
I hope Bob doesn't mind that I'm reveling his following PM to me but it explains why I'm butting in here!

Originally Posted by guzzle92
Here is one for you Gene. AIH delete.

Now I don't even know if you can even make a call on this one without extensive measurements on the AIH itself or air flow data. It may take some assumptions which is probably most difficult if not impossible with your background. Myself....assumptions are all I have to go on.

Just for grins and giggles, it would be interesting to see what kind of feedback you received if you are able to make any kind of educated call on this one without posting all of the supporting documentation on your reasoning..... but you would probably get chastised for the lack of that too.....interesting nevertheless.
Well yesterday was a travel day and I'm still recuperating but here goes! First I'll calculate the spider's flow restriction without the AIH element installed and here I'm just considering the path from where the spider receives its "cool air" input from the CAC tube to the "output hoses" leading to the plenums. I modeled this path as having a flow restriction that's comparable to that of a 3-ft length of straight pipe where the pipe diameter is somewhere between 2.5" to 3.0".

The R Inches H2O restriction of this path depends on the VAF=Volume Air Flow (CFM) flow going through the spider and into the cylinders and for a 444 in^3 engine with a VE=Volumetric Efficiency of 80% when operating at 2,900 rpm this is a... VAF={(0.1285)(VE)(RPM)}={(0.1285)(0.8)(2,900)}=300 cfm.

In the graph below if you look across from 300 CFM until you come to the blue curve (3.0" dia) and then down to the black AFV=Air Flow Velocity curve you see a AFV=70 mph and then look down to also see a R=0.5" H2O and if you look across from 300 CFM until you come to the red curve (2.5" dia) and then down to the black AFV curve you see a AFV=100 mph and then look down to also see a R=1" H2O ...and this bounds the spider's flow restriction without the AIH element installed as being between R=0.5" H2O with a 70 mph AFV and R=1" H2O with a 100 mph AFV.



Now here's where someone needs to measure the actual AIH element and post the result but for now I'll assume the element has a 0.25" dia and is 2" long and this gives an Ap=Projected Frontal Area of... Ap=(0.25)(2)=0.5 in^2=0.0035 ft^2 ...and I'll also assume... Cd=0.75 ...where Cd=Drag Coefficient which is a dimensionless ratio that takes into account the objects shape.

This equation gives the ADHP=Aerodynamic Drag HP of the AIH element... ADHP={(Ap)(Cd)(MAP)(MPH^3)}/{(MAT+460)(4,150)} hp ...and I'm assuming a BP=28 psig which gives a MAP=14.7+28=42.7 psia and that MAT=140*F due to a long duration steady state flow like you encounter when climbing a long grade.

Here's the ADHP calculation for the worst case of R=1" H2O with a 100 mph AFV... ADHP={(Ap)(Cd)(MAP)(MPH^3)}/{(MAT+460)(4,150)}={(0.0035)(0.75)(42.7)(100^3)}/{(140+460)(4,150)}=0.045 hp ...and you can relate a given ADHP to a "drag restriction" Rd from this equation... Rd={(ADHP)(6,343)}/(VAF) Inches H2O ...so the Rd for a ADHP=0.045 hp is ...Rd={(ADHP)(6,343)}/(VAF)={(0.045)(6,343)}/(300)=1" H2O.

So the addition of the AIH element causes an additional "drag restriction" of Rd=1" H2O and without the AIH element installed the restriction was R=1" H2O so with the element installed the total restriction is Rt=2" H2O and the restriction doubles!

For the case of R=0.5" H2O with a 70 mph AFV you get... Rd={(0.015)(6,343)}/(300)=0.3" H2O ...and without the AIH element installed the restriction was R=0.5" H2O so with the element installed the total restriction is Rt=0.8" H2O and the restriction increases by a factor of (0.8)/(0.5)=1.6!

So having the AIH element installed causes a large "percentage" increase in "spider restriction" ranging from a 60% to a 100% increase but so what!!! For the stated conditions the gauge pressure at the turbo outlet is 30 psig and comparing that with a BP=28 psig in the spider means the intercooler restriction is 2 psi=55" H2O ...and what really counts is the gauge pressure inside the cylinder at BDC of the intake strokes which is only 80% of the spider pressure or 22.4 psig so you can view the intake valve as having a 5.6 psi=155" H2O restriction ...so when you consider the total 7.6 psi=210" H2O restriction from the turbo outlet to inside the cylinders it really doesn't make much "bottom-line" difference if you have an additional 1" H2O restriction which is only a 0.5% increase due to the AIH element!

Please ask some questions ...especially if you don't understand why the CFM flow going through the spider and into the cylinders doesn't depend on boost and is only 300 cfm and not a number like the 600 cfm that everyone talks about when discussing air filters!
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 10:40 PM
  #13  
guzzle92's Avatar
guzzle92
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 1
From: Northern Colorado
GENE! You forgot to leave out all of your supporting documentation!!!!!!!!!!!! (I know, you couldn't help yourself)

So what I get out of that is that is does create a restriction but it is so little, it does not make a difference, especially with the SOTP gauge.

The only assumption that may be off, since I don't have an AIH here to measure, but from what I remember, the AIH is about 3/4" in diameter and 2 1/2 to 2 3/4" in length.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #14  
ernesteugene's Avatar
ernesteugene
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
From: Fulltime RVer
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by guzzle92
...The only assumption that may be off, since I don't have an AIH here to measure, but from what I remember, the AIH is about 3/4" in diameter and 2 1/2 to 2 3/4" in length...
I'll plug in these dimensions when I get a chance but first let me modify the following statement which I wrote while watching the football game last night!

Originally Posted by ernesteugene
...First I'll calculate the spider's flow restriction without the AIH element installed and here I'm just considering the path from where the spider receives its "cool air" input from the CAC tube to the "output hoses" leading to the plenums. I modeled this path as having a flow restriction that's comparable to that of a 3-ft length of straight pipe where the pipe diameter is somewhere between 2.5" to 3.0"...
The above statement should've said... a flow restriction that's comparable to that of a 3-ft length of straight pipe (flowing atmospheric density air) where the pipe diameter is somewhere between 2.5" to 3.0"... and for the 2.5 times higher air density in the spider due to a BP=28 psi this corresponds to a 3/2.5=1.2 ft length of straight pipe!

The "physical" flow path through the spider isn't 1.2 ft in length but the actual path isn't straight and even the slightest bend plus the "Y" divider increases the restriction so I think an "equivalent" 1.2 ft length of straight pipe is a pretty good model for the actual spider restriction!

However the real reason I'm using a 1.2 ft length of straight pipe is that I already had a graph for a 3-ft length pipe flowing atmospheric density air that was done a long time ago for an unrelated effort and as the old saying goes ...if your only "tool" is a "hammer" then every problem looks like a "nail" ...so I used that previous graph as convenient a "tool" for this new problem!

Originally Posted by guzzle92
...So what I get out of that is that is does create a restriction but it is so little, it does not make a difference, especially with the SOTP gauge...
If you're talking about achieving more HP due to generating more BP in the spider then consider that Increased HP comes from an increased fuel supply and increasing the BP so as to provide more air supply than is required to combust the fuel supply that's currently being injected actually "reduces" your net flywheel power because... increasing the BP increases the exhaust back pressure which increases the engine's "pumping loss" ...and it takes more power to run the turbo compressor to compress that extra air supply which also releases more heat into the intake air supply ...and during the engine's compression strokes it takes more power to compress that extra air supply!

Check out my post #26 here... https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...w-8k-lb-2.html ...where I wrote...

Originally Posted by ernesteugene
...Well here's yet another "penalty hp equation" to consider and this "penalty hp" results from running "excessive BP" and this "penalty hp" also places additional stress on the rods and reduces your MPG. I'll call this the CSHP*=Compression Stroke HP* penalty where the * denotes that it's a "penalty hp" associated with running an actual BP that's higher than the BP* which is the "smoke free BP" needed to combust the actual fuel flow being used to produce the actual FWHP.

CSHP*={(VE)(CID)(RPM)(BP-BP*)}/(173,000) hp

I'm very familiar with this "penalty hp" because it's a "designed in feature" on my C7 which has a maximum FWHP=300 at an RPM=2,200 and this FWHP could easily be produced without any smoke at all by using an actual BP=22 psig but in order to meet the 2003 NOx emissions without using EGR CAT runs the wastegate so that the turbo produces a BP=28 psig! This gives a... CSHP*={(VE)(CID)(RPM)(BP-BP*)}/(173,000)={(0.8)(442)(2,200)(28-22)}(173,000)=27 hp!

In addition to placing additional stress on the rods this 27 hp "emissions penalty" also increases the fuel consumption by 1 MPG compared to the older 3126 which runs at a lower BP for the same 300 FWHP! Of course if CAT had used EGR to meet emissions there'd also be a 27 hp "emissions penalty" and I'd rather have the extra fresh air going into the cylinders instead of exhaust gas! ...
Originally Posted by guzzle92
...GENE! You forgot to leave out all of your supporting documentation!!!!!!!!!!!! (I know, you couldn't help yourself)...
Here's some more references on the topic of airflow and fuel flow...

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...gine-need.html

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...ing-smoke.html

...and I just noticed that this last thread has a long reply that I never got around to answering!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheTowingCowboy
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
30
Jun 27, 2017 12:37 PM
mattwoodsd
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Sep 14, 2016 05:50 PM
bettywhite
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
13
Mar 30, 2016 06:36 AM
sudsmcduff
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
12
Sep 29, 2015 02:36 PM
pip-clark
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
16
Sep 7, 2007 09:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE