Inside job my ***, was there any Americans holding the box cutters, NOPE! All Muslims. I just cannot figure out...... better not say anything else.......

Charlie Sheen, Yeah, what a figurehead, requests a meeting with mr media for an investigation. I can just see it now, instead of two teleprompters, there will be four! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

Really, and if it exist, people in hell want ice water too!

 

Charlie Sheen?, Obama,?.........................Just add in Joe Biden and its another episode of " 2 1/2 men "

 

And how do you wise guys explain molten steel? Box cutters? Jet fuel? Not!

 

I'll admit that it blow's my mind box cutter's set off the whole incident. Although, considering there hasn't been any kind of incident similar to 9/11 in US history, people probably didn't really consider their plane would be used as a missile.

Thankfully, flight 93 was a different story after the passengers learned of the earlier attacks.

Bdox: Since me and Paul seem to be missing the obvious signs of a cover up, can you give me the cliff notes of what went down on that day.

1) Who planted the explosives?
2) Why? Guessing you think the same as the other loons out there and think Bush had some secret oil deal.
3) Also considering the release of the Lockerbie bomber, don't you think it would be easier to work out a deal similar to that alleged fiasco then try to coordinate such a elaborate plan?

Obviously you feel very strongly in your opinion, I just want to try and understand your thinking....

 

There was masses of molten steel. Jet fuel could create enough heat to cause steel to deform but not the kind of heat to shear steel beams. The beams from the fallen building were cut up in fairly uniform length and the ends were severed by heat. Like a cutting torch or perhaps thermite. These phenomenon have not been adequately explained.

Ask any police investigator how you handle a crime scene. Every policy was violated as far as preserving and recording the details of the crime scene.

There had never in history been a high rise building brought down by fire. Three fell on 9/11, and the official report claims it was the result of fires. No mention of the heat shearing of steel.

I have stated several times that I don't know who planted the explosives. But that is not proof of anything. Why do you keep bringing up Bush and oil. I never said one word about that.

If you are really interested in understanding my thinking, focus on the facts and the physical evidence.

If you read the official 9/11 Report, you will see that the conclusions that make up the "story" are based on a lot of conjecture.

Also, take a long look at the tenants in WTC 7, what records were kept there. Also the fact that the building was only slightly damaged and the fires were not that serious and the building was completely evacuated including all firefighters at the time that the building came down at free fall speed and fell into it's own footprint.

And how did the news have the entire story of the "highjackers" and all their plans and identities and methods and history within two or three days after the disaster took place. Just a little too clever.

There are a million questions that have not had sensible answers, so pardon me if I keep looking for some answers. The people who died that day deserve nothing less than getting ALL the questions answered, not just enough to satisfy the news requirements of inquiring minds.

 

I never saw any pics of molten steel, a lot of twisted I-Beam steel that looked like it had been subjected to extremely high heat, but not molten. The same goes for the rebar. Nothing different. Now there was pics of molten aluminum. The building and plane was full of it.

I also find it quite amusing regarding the planting of explosives. Really, I want to know who, what, where and how it was done. It would take quite a bit to do this. And since it was a conspiracy, it would have taken a lot of people to pull this off, not just a bunch of misguided hijackers. It has been eight years, surely someone involved would have rolled by now. Until then, conspiracy, NOPE!

 

This thread has wandered far off track.

Just look at the list of lives lost...
Respect.

 

Jim, it sure has. The Conspiracist attacked, as usual.

 

There's a lot of insanity going on in this thread......

Bdox...I used to think a lot better of you with the whole common-sense thingee......

A couple of you here, I don't know who you are.......

 

This conspiracy BS is just too much. I do not believe it and anybody that does, well.....

Unsubscribing!

 

Steve, it is a transparent tactic that you have resorted to here. I expect better from you. Even though we often disagree I usually don't mind your jabs when they address something specific. This is just like yelling "booo" from the sideline. Be a sport and address something specific if you want to take part. I know a lot of participants don't have the intellect to do that but based on your past I know you are up to it.

 

What you fail to realize is that the "official version" is a conspiracy theory. Your lame innuendos just make you look, well...

 

I'm not being 'transparent' in any tactics, Bruce.......

And I'm not going to argue the points all over again. That was done ad-nauseaum in the 'WTC 7' thread a year or two ago.

Let's just say that the brilliant scientific deductions you guys are latching onto fall apart into utter BS when the obvious and 'transparent' inconsistencies and 'proof' are right before your eyes.

 

I have to think you have not looked into it at all if that's what you believe. I don't want to re-hash the whole scene, but you said something about my "common sense" which is working just fine. If you want to point out something that I have said to enforce your statement, I'd like for you to put it up here. Notice that some others here make their lame generalizations and duck out, but you can't expect too much from that type. But in your case I usually am not disappointed in the quality of debate.

 

Bruce, when the 'truth' is so obvious, there isn't really a debate. Debating the 'bizarre'.....Especially when you've done it (too much) before is futility.