6637 question

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 8, 2009 | 10:14 AM

#16

jkidd_39

Posting Guru

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,392

Likes: 0

From: NW Arkansas

Quote:

Originally Posted by SGnAZ

So,what is the problem with this mod?I see lots of guys and gals here have done this and haven't read any negatives on it yet

He is saying that the heat shield is there to protect the cold air from the heat coming off the exhaust manifold.

This is a very true statement, however most believe it is incredibly ugly and remove it because of that fact.

In all reality it does affect air temps sitting at idle. But if you perform the ZooDad mod then you greatly increase air flow to the engine compartment. Thus negating the problem.

Disclaimer:
*All comments are my personal opinion. They seem to make logical sense in my head.*

Apr 8, 2009 | 10:14 AM

#17

F250_

Hotshot

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 11,286

Likes: 263

From: North of Greenville

If you search for ernesteugene's posts on the subject, he has plenty of reading for you, and I wouldn't dare even try to summarize it.

Apr 8, 2009 | 10:15 AM

#18

jkidd_39

Posting Guru

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,392

Likes: 0

From: NW Arkansas

I Dare to!!! Boosh!!

Apr 8, 2009 | 10:17 AM

#19

SGnAZ

Posting Guru

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 1,825

Likes: 2

From: Az

Quote:

Originally Posted by F250_

If you search for ernesteugene's posts on the subject, he has plenty of reading for you, and I wouldn't dare even try to summarize it.

I have tried to read his posts but, they sometimes read like a rambling manifesto-no offense eugene

Apr 8, 2009 | 10:17 AM

#20

MiamiPSD

More Turbo

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 506

Likes: 5

From: South Florida

WOW! and I was getting ready to ask if I would be better off with the 6637 or my AFE2.

Gotta stop reading all this stuff, It's stressing me big time.

Apr 8, 2009 | 10:18 AM

#21

superduty4x4

Hotshot

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 12,177

Likes: 40

From: Newport, WA

The driver's side CAC tube is the hot side anyways...

Apr 8, 2009 | 11:14 AM

#22

Riffraff Diesel

PREMIUM SPONSOR

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 6,037

Likes: 73

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiPSD

WOW! and I was getting ready to ask if I would be better off with the 6637 or my AFE2.

Gotta stop reading all this stuff, It's stressing me big time.

Just depends if you want to spend $300 or $45

__________________

Clay

Riffraff Diesel: Contact Us

Join Us On Our Facebook Page

Apr 8, 2009 | 11:20 AM

#23

Pocket

Post Fiend

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 9,293

Likes: 10

From: Parker, CO

Quote:

Originally Posted by SGnAZ

So,what is the problem with this mod?I see lots of guys and gals here have done this and haven't read any negatives on it yet

That's because most of the negatives come from people who have never run it.

Probably 99% of the folks who have used or currently use the 6637 like it.

FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Joe Kucinski

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

Brett Foote

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Michael S. Palmer

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Verdad Gallardo

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Joe Kucinski

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Brett Foote

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Michael S. Palmer

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Joe Kucinski

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Brett Foote

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Joe Kucinski

Apr 8, 2009 | 11:21 AM

#24

superduty4x4

Hotshot

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 12,177

Likes: 40

From: Newport, WA

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiPSD

WOW! and I was getting ready to ask if I would be better off with the 6637 or my AFE2.

Gotta stop reading all this stuff, It's stressing me big time.

6637 is a dang fine setup, especially for the price. If you feel like spending the money on the AFE then by all means do it, but don't feel like you have to.

Apr 8, 2009 | 11:26 AM

#25

MiamiPSD

More Turbo

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 506

Likes: 5

From: South Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riffraff Performance

Just depends if you want to spend $300 or $45

What do you mean? I have the AFE2 already installed and my question was is it worth the performance gain or are they equal?

Apr 8, 2009 | 11:30 AM

#26

superduty4x4

Hotshot

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 12,177

Likes: 40

From: Newport, WA

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiPSD

What do you mean? I have the AFE2 already installed and my question was is it worth the performance gain or are they equal?

The 6637 is not any better, or any worse, than an AFE2. The 6637 wins for most of us because its so dang affordable.

Apr 8, 2009 | 11:37 AM

#27

MiamiPSD

More Turbo

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 506

Likes: 5

From: South Florida

Thanks, always looking for performance. Will stick it out for now with the AFE2.

Apr 8, 2009 | 12:05 PM

#28

superduty4x4

Hotshot

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 12,177

Likes: 40

From: Newport, WA

If you already have the AFE2 then yes, keep it. When you get tired of washing filters, look into the 6637 filter in your AFE intake

Apr 8, 2009 | 12:08 PM

#29

F250_

Hotshot

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 11,286

Likes: 263

From: North of Greenville

Quote:

Originally Posted by SGnAZ

I have tried to read his posts but, they sometimes read like a rambling manifesto-no offense eugene

... hence my hesitancy at trying to summarize!!

Apr 8, 2009 | 03:35 PM

#30

ernesteugene

Postmaster

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 2,647

Likes: 0

From: Fulltime RVer

Quote:

Originally Posted by ernesteugene

Before doing the "6637 mod" I suggest reading post #29 here... https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...637-mod-2.html ...and before doing the "foil delete mod" I suggest reading post #65 here... https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...ml#post7160776 ...and if these posts don't convince you that both of these mods are "counter-indicated" then please ask for additional information.

Please note that the above post was my first and only planned post on this thread and it was intended to provide a relatively new member with an easily way of obtaining useful information and offer to answer any additional questions he might have.

Clearly if the OP so chooses he can click on my reference links and read for himself and draw his own conclusions and ask questions if he wants to! Now just what's so offensive about my original post and my method for trying to disseminate useful information that I deserved to have someone jump in my face over it?

What purpose is served by just getting in someone's face for the thrill of it and in the process not contributing any technical information at all? I thought the primary purpose of this forum is discussing technical information not getting in each other's faces!