Notices

302 Head Swap Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 10:12 PM
  #1  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
302 Head Swap Problem

Dear SBF Gurus
As stated in title I have a prob or two....... I am assembling a pre-75 302 which had a severe valve failure rendering one head pretty much useless.......I have a newly machined set of what are supposed to be 91 Mustang 302 heads....... they bolted up perfect...... but there were no rockers with them.....so digging thru my parts pile I found a set of pedestal rockers(bolts) for an 85 351W.... I used the push rods from the pre-75 engine which had non-pedestal rockers (nuts)....the push rods seem quite loose.....do I need a set from a roller 302??? or are the 351W rockers not compatible???
Also the sparkplugs I got for a 91 Mustang do not want to thread into the holes????? They look like the right ones, they thread into the 85 351W heads fine..... but I can not get them to start in the 91 heads......... seems like the threads are either too far in for the plugs to reach or they are a different thread ????
Any ideas to fix these probs.... Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:04 AM
  #2  
fordeverpower's Avatar
fordeverpower
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
From: iowa
The pushrods may be loose because the lifters have bleed off. You could get a adjustable pushrod, and check the length with the rocker torqued down and the cam lobe on the base circle. measure the pushrod and add about .020 for lifter preload.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 07:52 AM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
What is the casting number on the heads you got? By the description of the plug hole I suspect you have either E6(1986) heads or Gt40p heads.. both of which require special plugs. Any Ford SB pedistal rocker will do but you will likely need custom pusrods, get a pushrod length checker to figure out what you need.

 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 08:09 AM
  #4  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
Thanks for the info...... it isn't my engine so I will get the casting number the next time I drop by my friends place........ kind of figured the pushrods were too short as I thought all the SB rockers were interchangeable...... but my "rememberer" isn't what it use to be
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #5  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 35
From: British Columbia
The pushrods should be the type used with pedestal rockers, i.e. from about 1978 and up. The early ones you used match up to the earlier "sled type" rocker arms.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #6  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
Little update I got some numbers from my friend but they do not match the chart posted here....... it is either E7531 or F7531 and those numbers are around the outside of a circle about 1/2 in diameter next to the valve springs, to the right of it is 5K7 and at the opposite end of the head is a ford oval... there are no stripes or lines on the ends of the heads.......and no other numbers I can see... other than an S on one end of the head next to the lower head bolt and a 6 on the other end.....
I am confused as I thought 302/5.0L heads were fully interchangeable.............. never even heard of GP40, or whatever, heads till he had this problem........ any other ideas??? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #7  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
I should have mentioned but the casting numbers are on the head gasket side near one of the center intake ports..

 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
Ok I guess it is time to dig out the mirror :-) Thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 09:53 PM
  #9  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
Ok got the casting numbers, I hope
E6SE-AA
So I guess they are from an 86 something or other...... so why the werid spark plug holes?????
Thanks again for any answers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 11:43 PM
  #10  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 35
From: British Columbia
E6SE heads

Uh oh... I think you'll hear a little bit of criticism about those heads.

I believe they are 1986 only items. A friend has them on his 1986 HO Mustang motor and is happy with the engine, but he's not revving it high (it's in a 1983 TBird with an AOD).
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 10:37 AM
  #11  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
I do not think high reving comes into the equation, as they are now in a 66 Mustang that never sees rain let alone high revs
So the spark plugs I need are from an 86 GT then I guess......
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #12  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes, you need the long reach plug (Motocraft AWSF44C or Champion RS14LC). These heads were a 1 year experiment in combustion chamber design, it's kidney bean shaped instead of D shaped. The idea is this will promote more A/F mixture and better ignition flashover which should make more TQ... and it does. But because the chamber is more recessed in the head it also shrowds the intake valve, and for some reason Ford decide to put a massive air injection hump in the exhaust port that year as well, so these heads really choke the motor and limit peak HP. Bottom line is if this isnt going to be a high performance motor these heads will be fine, but somebody lied to you or just didn't know any better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #13  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
Thanks for the info that fixes the spark plug problem..... on to the push rods next.... they appear to be .060" or so too short........ so on another note can a fellow just grind off those massive air injection humps????
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #14  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by sparky
on to the push rods next.... they appear to be .060" or so too short........
Because of the recessed combustion chamber the valves are further off the deck so longer pushrods will be needed.


Originally Posted by sparky
so on another note can a fellow just grind off those massive air injection humps????
Yes.. but you want the heads off the motor and the valve removed to do it, don't want all the metal going in the motor.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 05:24 PM
  #15  
sparky's Avatar
sparky
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 3
From: Comox Valley, Canada
No wasn't planning on doing the grinding with the heads installed....just wondering as I may end up with the heads in the future if this doesn't work out for him
So are would the push rods for the engine these heads came off the correct length??
Thanks again.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.