Nitrogen filled tires?
I don't check my tires as often as I should, but I'd say virtually all of my low-pressure problems have been due to punctures (jobsites...), bad valves, bad beads and the like. Why? Because all my tires on a given vehicle are the same brand and model, and it's usually only 1 or 2 tires that are low. And, if I find some low, they will always be the ones that are low the next time I check. Oh, there is one more cause of low pressure--fall/winter weather and the ensuing temperature drops will cause low pressure, too. pV=nRT, you know.
Jason
Just amazing.
When the tires are filled with the N2 at Cosco, do they completely evacuate the tires first? If not then wouldn't you still have approximately 1/3 or 1/4 of the volume of the air in the tires being atmospheric? So you'd still have roughly 5-7% of the air in the tires being other than straight N2. Right?
And regarding the study Consumer Reports did, I believe they may have said that N2 in tires is only effective on Toyotas and Nissans and that it would have no effect on tires installed on American made cars...

The race car I work on runs tire pressures of about 20 PSI gauge. That shows a boiling point of about 225F. We routinely see tire temps above that.
When the tires are filled with the N2 at Cosco, do they completely evacuate the tires first? If not then wouldn't you still have approximately 1/3 or 1/4 of the volume of the air in the tires being atmospheric? So you'd still have roughly 5-7% of the air in the tires being other than straight N2. Right?


Jason
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Just amazing.
You must have magic tires that never leak air. It's the only reasonable explanation, because if your tires are low, it CAN'T be because air molecules have escaped. Never mind that this is proven to occur with every tire, automotive or otherwise, that has ever been manufactured on this planet.
Now, go back and read what I (and someone else originally brought up) wrote about air being 78% nitrogen, and how if that doesn't leak out, but the 20+% of oxygen does, you should be left with a tire that is "low", but not "flat". Now, if you re-fill that "low" tire with compressed air (78% nitrogen/20+%oxygen), you'll be at about 95% nitrogen. What I'm doing here is carrying the pro-nitrogen folks' statements to their logical conclusions, and I don't believe that to be a big stretch.
Andy, as far as I'm concerned, you're the one being argumentative--before that, I think there was a good discussion going on. Heck, I'm a painting contractor. You think I've never been nit-picked? I could tell stories...
There's no nit-picking in this thread--just some details of the science behind the debate getting hashed out. You know, variety is the spice of life and all that. Mark just pointed out that I'm right on a point and agreed with me, which confirmed the moisture part--racers see tire temps that would boil water, I, as a civvie, don't. Even on the hottest days, I've always been able to hold a hand to my tires, even ones that are somewhat low and have a lot of sidewall flex going on. Okay, so I'll concede that there may be a benefit to using nitrogen in racing applications, but I don't think that any of us here are challenging that--just challenging that there's a real benefit to using nitrogen in civilian tires for normal driving.
Jason
And, yes, I am wearing my skepticism on my sleeves here...
Jason

"We evaluated pairs of 31 tire models of H- and V-speed rated, all-season tires used in our tread wear test from 2006."











