Notices
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

Muffler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #1  
Breech's Avatar
Breech
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Denair, CA
Muffler

Okay, so I'm still working towards increasing my fuel economy. I'm working from a difficult foundation with the C6 and a 4.10 rear end. I just installed a set of new BF Goodrich Commercial T/A 235/85/16 tires and economy has already picked up from the shorter tires I had on there prior. I have an extra air cleaner assembly and am going to be looking to do a dual intake ram air set up in the near future but the grill on the 87 is so small that the routing looks like it's going to take some planning. So for now I'm going to work on freeing up the exhaust side. I'm not necessarily looking for more power so much as some improved economy so for now I'm staying with the stock 2.5" system. I just have had a hard time finding the right muffler for my needs. I certainly don't want loud............those days are long past, so straight pipe or a 40 series Flowmaster aren't going to cut it. I want improved flow, which shouldn't be hard considering my muffler appears to be the stock unit of 20+ years ago, and a mellow tone at most. I looked into diesel specific mufflers at first but they are pricey and most of them assume you have a turbo sittin ahead of it in the exhaust stream. So, for now the best candidate for the swap that I have found it this Dynomax 17788 - Dynomax HD Super Turbo Mufflers - JEGS . Any other opinions are welcome guys. Just trying to improve the flow a bit without a whole lot more sound.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #2  
Blueovals&Blacksmoke's Avatar
Blueovals&Blacksmoke
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Troy MT
well... heres what i read on a sign once.

" you have 3 options and you can only have 2 at once,
good cheap and fast,

good and fast, not cheap,
good and cheap, not fast
cheap and fast, not good"

you get what you pay for, i myself would go with a 3 inch system and a borla or gibson muffler all those " diesel specific " mufflers out there dont do much good over a high flowing performance muffler
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 02:04 AM
  #3  
David85's Avatar
David85
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 3
From: Campbell River, B.C.
Is the dual range an underdrive or an overdrive?

What are your MPGs right now?

I have a magnaflow in mine and its fairly quiet. Killed the turbo sound though

Opening up the exhaust might help a little, but for light cruising, you won't see that big a gain from simply swapping the muffler. Ram air I found would make a difference above 60 MPH of 1-3 MPG depending on conditions.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #4  
Breech's Avatar
Breech
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Denair, CA
Originally Posted by Blueovals&Blacksmoke
you get what you pay for, i myself would go with a 3 inch system and a borla or gibson muffler all those " diesel specific " mufflers out there dont do much good over a high flowing performance muffler
The diesel specific mufflers are generally very high flowing and are designed to withstand EGT's and exhaust pressures that would kill a normal muffler quickly. They aren't cheap though, take a look at what a nice Donaldson will set ya back. Borla and Gibson make decent products but I'm not gonna flush money down the tubes for a big name and a fancy look. I work too hard for it.


Originally Posted by David85
Is the dual range an underdrive or an overdrive?

What are your MPGs right now?

I have a magnaflow in mine and its fairly quiet. Killed the turbo sound though

Opening up the exhaust might help a little, but for light cruising, you won't see that big a gain from simply swapping the muffler. Ram air I found would make a difference above 60 MPH of 1-3 MPG depending on conditions.
Unfortunately it's an underdrive unit David. However, it may become a lot more useful to me when I get around to putting that 3.08 gear in.......but I'm just taking it one step at a time. The reason I feel the muffler may make a difference is that the truck looks like it's still equipped with the factory muffler, so we are talking about 20+ years of soot going through the thing. I'm sure it wasn't very high flowing to start with so God only knows how restrictive it is now. If I stand next to the tail pipe I can't hear any engine noise at all.........just sounds like a bunch of air rushing out of the tip. I had a large Magnaflow on my 460 and it was fairly mellow, I just wasn't sure how it would hold up on the the ol diesel.

I need to recheck my fuel mileage on the next fill up as it will be the first with the new tires but it already seems to be showing some improvement on the gauge over the shorter, wider tires that I replaced. I've consistently seen in between 11-14 mpg around town as it was before.

The ram air will be up next but I have to figure out how I'm going to route the intake hose and where I can place the openings. As I said, the redesigned grill for 87 has a lot less surface are than the 80-86 trucks had so it makes it that much more difficult. I really wanted to try to do it without doing much cutting of the rad support if any but I don't think that it's a possibility.

Seems to me that my old 85 460 had not only a larger grill but a good deal more open are in the engine bay compared to this ol girl.

 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #5  
a711112a's Avatar
a711112a
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
i had a hooker aero chamber muffler on a 5.0l truck loved the sound it had a deep tone
unlike flow masters that have that ringing sound i think they flow just as good as the flow masters
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
Breech's Avatar
Breech
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Denair, CA
Originally Posted by a711112a
i had a hooker aero chamber muffler on a 5.0l truck loved the sound it had a deep tone
unlike flow masters that have that ringing sound i think they flow just as good as the flow masters
I agree I had them on my 74 Duster and was so impressed I put one their catback system on my 96 Camaro too. For a gasser I wouldn't use anything else........great tone, not too loud, and none of that Flowmaster drone, they were perfect. The only problem is that I can only find them in a 14" case length so I'm thinking the muffler might just be a bit too small in this situation I do appreciate the suggestion though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #7  
a711112a's Avatar
a711112a
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
on that truck i y piped the headers to a 3 inch pipe that i ran to one aerochamber muffler the muffler sounded so good when i sold the truck the sound was the selling point
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #8  
a711112a's Avatar
a711112a
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
why does it kneed to have a bigger case length? if a smaller package gets the job done what does it matter?
mine had a 3 inch inlet and outlet
if i remember right they flowed 500+ cfm
let us know what u finally end up with and if u see any improvements in mpg
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
Breech's Avatar
Breech
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Denair, CA
Originally Posted by a711112a
why does it kneed to have a bigger case length? if a smaller package gets the job done what does it matter?
mine had a 3 inch inlet and outlet
if i remember right they flowed 500+ cfm
let us know what u finally end up with and if u see any improvements in mpg
Generally, the larger the case, the quieter the muffler will be and vice versa. I measured the one currently on my truck and it has roughly a 32 inch case length so the Hooker would be less than half as long........I can only assume it would greatly increase sound levels which I'm trying to stay away from. My stereo just isn't that good Plus I leave for work early in the morning so I'd like to stay on good terms with my neighbors. My buddy suggested I straight pipe it and I had flashbacks to my teenage years running my old VW Beetle with a non baffled stinger pipe and it made me cringe. I know to increase flow you generally have to sacrifice some sound deadening but I'm just trying to find the happy medium. The Dynomax HD Super Turbo that I provided the link for has a 31" case length and utilizes and 3" internal flow tube so I think it may be the right compromise but I'm still open to suggestions.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #10  
David85's Avatar
David85
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 3
From: Campbell River, B.C.
The magnaflow I got is stainless steel inside and out so it will survive the EGTs just fine, but its also for a 4" system. I had to make adaptors to make it work on my 3" pipe ($140 if I remember right). Magnaflow has a wide range of SS mufflers.

I hate to break it to you, but if you are mostly driving in city conditions (30-40MPH) than 4.10 gears are already pretty ideal for that. Unless the gear splitter is fully automatic, then you could get away with taller gears. But I'll tell you 3.08s do nothing for me in town. Short trips of 5 miles or less and it can easily go down to 12 MPG. The warm up time on diesels can put them at a disadvantage for short commuting when it comes to MPGs compared to gassers.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #11  
Breech's Avatar
Breech
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Denair, CA
Ya know, I call it city driving because it's not technically freeway but in reality they are old country roads. Strips of pavement that run anywhere from 1/4 mile to a couple of miles in length separated by the occasional stop sign. I spend more time at 55 mph than I do at 25 so I figure the 3.08's are still a valid idea. Not to mention that as it sits I hate taking my truck onto the freeway, it sure would be nice to have those rpms down a bit. I'll take a look at the magnaflows and see what I can find. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #12  
S.P.'s Avatar
S.P.
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver,WA.
Oct. issue of DIESEL WORLD mag. has all the cfm flow charts for straight pipe, by diameter, and "factory or calculated intake and exhaust flow" charts...
6.9 NA IDI -3000 rpm intake. 328 cfm.
exhaust. 886 cfm.
EGT. 1000*
I hope this helps. (the mag was a good read)
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #13  
Breech's Avatar
Breech
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Denair, CA
Thanks for the info S.P.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #14  
David85's Avatar
David85
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 3
From: Campbell River, B.C.
Well in that case, by all means go with the 3.08 swap. You will not regret it. Simply put, 56 MPH becomes 75 MPH. Its way cheaper than any other upgrade to drop the RPMs. The RPM could still be a little lower for higher freeway speeds even with 3.08s, but you won't be afraid of the on ramp anymore because it will just keep going till you run out of speedometer.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stu13
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Mar 27, 2014 10:26 AM
fordboy300
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
10
Jun 8, 2012 10:22 AM
Bsentman888
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
2
Feb 23, 2012 09:10 PM
ottocycle
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
10
Apr 23, 2010 09:11 AM
1966Tbird
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
Apr 7, 2009 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.