When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i bought my truck to work it, and I do. Sure, the 6-12 mpg sucks, but it gets the job done and done well. If you are one of these putzes that buys a truck to go grocery shopping, shut up and suck it up or better yet, get an econo-box.
If Ford ever made the superduty (read: WORK truck, not commuter car) weaker, that would just ruin it. We WORK GUYS buy trucks to work them. The rest of you panzies, get a mini-van to take your kids to soccer practice.
gotta love the crowd that buys a truck and then posts on the forums complaining about mpg.
I can tell you guys first hand that there is a fine line between knowing what customers want and knowing what they will settle for. The 09 F150 is far from perfect, yet customers will still buy it. Ford has no motivation to increace fuel economy because no one else is.
Lets also realize that there is no real competition here. As much as we may like to think there is, there just isn't. Each automaker is basically selling the same thing. It is made of steel (rusts away) driven by an engine (10 life expectancy), and fueled by something that gets more expencive every day.
If I walked into a dealership and asked for a truck that is completely rust proof, I would be laughed at. If I asked for a truck that gets 50 MPG, I would probably be thrown out. Both are possible, If we can walk on the moon, we can do this too. But there is no reason to change as long as the trucks keep selling. Ford knows that we always have, and always will continue to settle for less.
The fact that MPGs have changed so little in the last 20-30 years is proof that MPGs will not improve much in the years ahead.
David, I've got to think that truck sales falling off 15-20% in the last 3 quarters should give them a clue?
Like I've said before. If they built a truck that got mid 20's MPG, Peeps would be lined up around the block waiting to buy them.
A lot of people, like me, need a vehicle with a lot of space to carry stuff, but don't need to tow giant trailers, or drag race on the road, or show off how "macho" we think we are. I want a full sized truck with a weaker engine and good gas mileage!
David, I've got to think that truck sales falling off 15-20% in the last 3 quarters should give them a clue?
Not necessarily. As I said, since toyota, GM and dodge are basically offering the same high horsepower vehicles, their sales are in decline as well. Toyota is in fact in some trouble of their own. Chrysler is a company that nobody even wants, and mercedes recently flogged them to an organization that has no connection to the auto industry! GM recently posted he biggest single loss in the history of the auto sector (possibly inflated to justify cuts in labor costs). Fuel cost is playing a role, but if we are to look at the big picture here, the general downturn in the economy is also largely to blame (in no small part to the cost of energy). Folks may also be holding off until the 09 F150 comes out because when they buy new they tend to want the newest.
The auto sector in general is in trouble, its not strictly ford's problem.
When it comes to long term survival of companies like ford, the name of the game is market saturation and built in obsolesce. Its acceptable if they post losses and their sales decline. Just as long as they don't loose that market share to a competitor, and since auto sales are in decline for everybody, ford will probably just scale back its production, lay off a few thousand workers and carry on as usual. In another few years this could all be a distant memory.
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
Like I've said before. If they built a truck that got mid 20's MPG, Peeps would be lined up around the block waiting to buy them.
I might very well be one of them. Even then I can't see myself making payments on something that devalues faster than I can pay it off. But we would all benefit from a reduction if fuel consumption in this continent. Might even help the economy in the states get back in the black.
There is no reason an F150 needs to keep getting more and more horsepower all the while not gaining in mpg. The arguement that if you want better mpg, then buy a car is so ignorant its not even funny. I don't understand why such a small truck needs more than 325 HP...even 300 is probably enough. Then the cry is that you want to tow more...if you need to tow more than the 8000 pounds my 5.4 SCrew is rated to tow, buy a freakin SuperDuty. I can't imagine why anyone towing heavy loads or hauling at or near max capacity on a regular basis would even bother with the F150.
If you need that much power & tow/haul capacity, then trade up to a superduty. F150's are light duty trucks that can sstill work hard when you need, but in comparison get driven more daily than any other vehicle...I say put some technology and effort into keeping a 300-325hp engine that gets a solid low to mid 20's in mpg...
I agree with this statement. I can remember back in the mid 70s/early 80s when 250hp was a bunch, and we all got by with that level of power whether as a commuter vehicle or as a professional. I don't begrudge anyone that wants 500hp in their truck. If they are willing to give up their hard earned cash for it, and can afford to feed it, then by all means let them have it. What burns me is the lack of choice that most of us are given. Back in the 60s and 70s, we were typically given up to six power plant options, four transmissions, (especially GMs) and multiple trim packages for each powertrain option. Today, it boils down three engines and four trim packages that are "bundled". No, I cannot get a 4.2, manual transmission, and a Lariat trim (which would be ideal for the way I use a truck). Or better yet, a 3.0L I6 (200hp maybe?) with a manual and cushy trim. I believe I could coax 25mpg out of this rig and still travel in style, and it would haul all I need.
The point is, I bought my 5.4 Lariat because I really like it. Since Ford (nor any other OEM) makes a truck exactly the way I want, I "settled" for what is available and I quite frankly haven't been disappointed. It's well built, quiet, actually somewhat luxurious (yes I like the fluff now that I'm getting older), and it performs pretty darn well for a truck. It is overpowered for what I use it for, but so what. I wish I could continue to drive it everyday. However it has sat in the garage for the past three weeks while I drive something that gets better fuel economy (mostly 2-wheel transportation). I use it when I need to haul something.
If others are doing the same thing, it doesn't bode well for Ford. I've only put 6000 miles on the F150 in the past year. In the past, I would have typically put on 25,000 miles a year. At this rate, my F150 will last 20 years so Ford has lost a potential buyer for a long time.