When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I noticed that the photos say to coat the electrode shell with anti-seize but not the threads. Aren't the heads on a 5.4 3V engine made of aluminum? Steel plug in an aluminum head? I thought that it is carved in stone to use anti-seize with dissimilar metals, as in this case?
I noticed that the photos say to coat the electrode shell with anti-seize but not the threads. Aren't the heads on a 5.4 3V engine made of aluminum? Steel plug in an aluminum head? I thought that it is carved in stone to use anti-seize with dissimilar metals, as in this case?
I don't care what anyone says...
Not for one second would I hesitate to use *standard silver anti-seize* on the steel threads going into an Aluminum Cylinder Head!
I noticed that the photos say to coat the electrode shell with anti-seize but not the threads. Aren't the heads on a 5.4 3V engine made of aluminum? Steel plug in an aluminum head? I thought that it is carved in stone to use anti-seize with dissimilar metals, as in this case?
I've also been wondering about this, but no one is haveing trouble with the threads on the plugs.......
I noticed that the photos say to coat the electrode shell with anti-seize but not the threads. Aren't the heads on a 5.4 3V engine made of aluminum? Steel plug in an aluminum head? I thought that it is carved in stone to use anti-seize with dissimilar metals, as in this case?
It's quite possible that the TSB says not to use anti-seize on the threads because it specifies a torque value for tightening the plugs. Generally, torque values apply only to clean, dry threads. Adding any type of lubricant can result in stripped threads if you don't decrease the torque used. I think you need to decrease the torque by 15% if my memory serves me correctly (too lazy to look it up right now). Personally, I think it's a good idea to use anti-seize on the threads when there are dissimilar metals involved.
I recall that with the previous problem in the 2 valve heads that what was happening was that because the factory didn't use never-seize on the spark plug threads and the threads would get exposed to water in their location, they would seize to the aluminum heads and tear some of the threads out with the plug. When the new plug was put back in, there would be very little of the threads left and eventually could blow out of the head, which some did. The way to stop it was to remove the plugs early on, before galvanic reaction took place, and put never seize on the threads and replace them. The other thing to do is to never wash the engine because the water would sit in the plug cavity (2V plugs are on top of the head) and corrode the crap out of it. That's another reason that I don't tailgate in the rain with my '02 Mustang, I don't want water splashed up under the hood on the engine.
I think that I would rather use the anti seize and reduce the torque by 2 or 3 foot pounds. If the factory had used the never seize on the spark plugs in the 2V engines, it's likely that problem would never have happened.
Last edited by Hematite; Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38 AM.
I beleive the build date will be on the sticker on the drivers door jamb or in your paper work??? I do not beleive u can tell by looking at the heads from the outside they look the same it is the plug seat that has been changed??
how can i tell when my motor was built or how can i tell if i have the updated heads and plugs
I would have to say that any engine built in October was going into a 2008 truck. Traditionally, production ends in July, possibly August, on a model year.
Does anyone have any data as to what percentage of 5.4 engines are having thie spark plug removel problem. And does the 4.6 engine have the same problem
The 4.6 engines do not have the same problems as the 3v 5.4s.
As for a %.... I'm not sure, I'd say all of them can have the problem if the proper precautions aren't taken.
It does seem that the people that attempt the spark plug change early aren't having to many problems.
Hmm, I wonder what the design difference is between the 4.6 3V and the 5.4 3V? I would have taken for granted that the 4.6 3V would also have the problem. Ford must have done something right on the 4.6?
I suspect that an early change of plugs and the use of never-seize will make a big difference.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.