Notices

Lost #2 intake lifter...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #16  
Redmanbob's Avatar
Redmanbob
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 4
From: Mddl A MexCans
Shop at Dizzy Land expect to have to check the work

Hope the Party's are a great time, and you make them all... No drinking and driving... leave our truck at the first stop you start enjoying yourself at.. (if you drink) BOL..
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:29 PM
  #17  
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
Alvin in AZ
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 8
From: Gadsden Purchase
Originally Posted by Redmanbob
Shop at Dizzy Land expect to have to check the work ;)
No drinking and driving... leave our truck at the first stop you start enjoying yourself at.. (if you drink) BOL..
Yep would have been cool if the parts would have been the right size... i would have been done more than 24 hours ago. Turns out they are actually .030" under, ~3/32" difference between those and my used .060" over rods.

My buddies don't drink or smoke, they've been accused of being Mormons but since they cuss like sailors, I don't think they are. ;)

I'm sure they'd figure out a way to get me a ride but i don't want that... I want to get there under my own FE steam. :)

This doesn't count as the truck leaving me stranded. It wasn't broke down, it was running fine, I just decided to tear into it for the fun of it. :)

In over 32 years my clunky old pickup has never broke down and left me stranded, anywhere, ever. :)

Anyway back to work, got a few things i want to do yet.

Like, one valve was standing pretty high out of 16, I'm fiddling with that.
(#8 intake)

Its lash is .065" (with the shims) and a .060" over push rod and about .220" with a new .030" under rod.

Numbers are starting to look more like it huh?
...now that we know the new rods are .030" under.

The rest on that side are ~.120" to ~1.40" with the shims and .060" over rods.

Thinking about shortening (grinding off and re-polishing) a .060"-over-rod... about .045". :)

A new standard pushrod would give me .120" tho.

Alvin in AZ
 

Last edited by Alvin in AZ; May 10, 2007 at 11:42 PM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 06:28 AM
  #18  
kotzy's Avatar
kotzy
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 970
Likes: 3
I just dug out an old dusty book 390 calls for 100 to 200 thousands. With that in mind I guess if we pulled a lifter apart I would guess the measurement of the plunger travel would be about 300 thousands, or perhaps more. What you are trying to do with different lenght rod is center the travel of the plunger in the lifter bore. Your 65 measurement was a bit tight removeing the 60 longer rod should bring it to 120. The most important part of the whole operation is having the lifter collapsed and the cylinder being measured at tdc compression when checking the lash. Kotzy
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #19  
Redmanbob's Avatar
Redmanbob
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 4
From: Mddl A MexCans
One very important part is that the rocker tip rides on the valve tip like it should. If your off center it's gonna make for a wonder wear pattern and last forever and ever...

Leave you stranded ? You must be thinking of one of those other trucks I can honestly say I yet to own a Ford that went out on me when I didnt have it comming
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #20  
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
Alvin in AZ
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 8
From: Gadsden Purchase
Kotzy and Bob, the dangged thing is clacking to beat hell.
.100 to .200" lash is just for stock Ford lifters? :)

Just got off the phone with CompCams and he said to measure the pushrod travel, he didn't care nuthing about the lash...
"we want the plunger pushed down into the lifter .030 to .060""
...when the lifter is on the cam's base circle.

"drop the push rod down on the lifter and mark it, tighten down the rocker shaft and mark the pushrod again"

That's about 1/32 to 1/16 of an inch.
There is more difference than that in the valve stem heights.

Hmmm... I need to call them again and find out how much total travel the plunger has, in the lifters I have. :)

This is my first experience messing with hydraulic lifters. :)

I think I like adjusting solid lifters better. ;)

Alvin in AZ
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #21  
seetwisted's Avatar
seetwisted
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: las vegas nv.
Milling the heads, gasket variations,valve seat and stem variations,etc. etc. The combinations are endless, to get the preload right each valve has to be checked individually. Then the correct push rod for each one to bring the adjustment to the correct tolerences. Yeah...been here too. I figured they'd all be the same and hydralic lifters are supposed to take care of that...right? I ended up with the tighty loosey tappeys...and found pictures of a close to home dummy on the bottoms of my lifters. thats why if your motors going back with the same parts you keep all the parts in order to not mess up the preload...along with other reasons I have laboriously learned. I got mad and went with adjustable rockers and learned more things the hard way. But read here how to fix them all...
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #22  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
If the heads are done right, all the valve stems will be the same height, so if you check one and it's right, the rest will be too. Only now a days there are very few shops doing it right anymore. Back in the old days in the 60's and early 70's you could send your heads in and get them back done right, now, it's a bigger crap shoot than going to Vegas to win.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Davidwent
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
8
Sep 8, 2011 10:08 AM
voodoosurfer
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
3
Nov 18, 2008 03:32 PM
welavalle
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
3
Sep 17, 2006 02:30 AM
edward327
Bronco II
12
Feb 20, 2004 05:25 PM
elsmith
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
Feb 21, 2001 03:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE