7.3 Vs 6.0
#121
#122
Originally Posted by jvoigt
Come on people, go back and read the original post. This is not about personnal preference....its about which one has the best power potential.......more or less.
#123
#125
Heheh.. I'm just tired of the bickering.. Back and fourth about who's better then who.. Each person learns their own lesson in life.. Sure the 7.3 was a good block, so is the 6.0.. I know for a fact that my buddy who has a DP Tuner and a Wicked Wheel can't keep up with me.. We've already tested that theory.. I look at it this way.. If your going to compare apples to oranges, then take it to the track and prove your theory.. But this he said, she said b/s is childish.. I'm not saying 6.0 is better then the 7.3, nor am I sayin the 7.3 is better then the 6.0.. All I'm saying is prove it to me.. Put two vehicles modified the same next to each other.. Run the tree and see who comes out on top.. It's simple..
I'm more of a Science type of guy.. I rely on proven fact I see with my own eyes over ficitional mayhem drawn up from another..
But keep the fun going.. This is comical.. I'm enjoying it
I'm more of a Science type of guy.. I rely on proven fact I see with my own eyes over ficitional mayhem drawn up from another..
But keep the fun going.. This is comical.. I'm enjoying it
#128
Originally Posted by mrxlh
I agree, 7.3 guys, (Luke help me out here) list your dyno sheets and cost of mods. 6.0 guys do the same, then lets see what the totals in dollars and HP/TQ are? Would that be agreeable? The one part I don't think will ever be agreed upon is the dependability portion, not for at least 5-10 more years.
#129
*note disclaimer* I hate 7.3l's and modulars in superduties. I am also considered an ahole in general. I am ok with it, so don't bother pointing it out, I already know.
Originally Posted by mrxlh
No takers? Got awfully quite in here in a hurry. Darn that was easy.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v318/lukecline/Dyno%20Sheets%20and%20Pics%204-30-05/?action=view¤t=dyno2.jpg
Best was actually 596/1200+ but the dyno op didnt put it on the sheet though. Cost.... uhh well alot.
Last edited by lukecline; 09-04-2007 at 01:12 PM.
#130
Originally Posted by lukecline
At least your up front and honest about it lol.
Sorry, i didnt see your post. I quit following this thread along time ago, bercause I will never win a "my dong is longer than your dong" contest, that part of my body has dwarfism.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v318/lukecline/Dyno%20Sheets%20and%20Pics%204-30-05/?action=view¤t=dyno2.jpg
Best was actually 596/1200+ but the dyno op didnt put it on the sheet though. Cost.... uhh well alot.
Sorry, i didnt see your post. I quit following this thread along time ago, bercause I will never win a "my dong is longer than your dong" contest, that part of my body has dwarfism.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v318/lukecline/Dyno%20Sheets%20and%20Pics%204-30-05/?action=view¤t=dyno2.jpg
Best was actually 596/1200+ but the dyno op didnt put it on the sheet though. Cost.... uhh well alot.
#131
I want some proven facts Glass. Your speculating, assuming, etc., Brian kinney's truck has thousands of dollars dumped into the motor to achieve those hp numbers, for that matter so does Luke and I. Bottom line is that if you were to put the same amount of money into a 6.0 you'd have something untouchable. Like my country brother from another mother Storm said, were comparing apples to oranges.
Cowboy Steve
Cowboy Steve
#132
Originally Posted by lukecline
At least your up front and honest about it lol.
Sorry, i didnt see your post. I quit following this thread along time ago, bercause I will never win a "my dong is longer than your dong" contest, that part of my body has dwarfism.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v318/lukecline/Dyno%20Sheets%20and%20Pics%204-30-05/?action=view¤t=dyno2.jpg
Best was actually 596/1200+ but the dyno op didnt put it on the sheet though. Cost.... uhh well alot.
Sorry, i didnt see your post. I quit following this thread along time ago, bercause I will never win a "my dong is longer than your dong" contest, that part of my body has dwarfism.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v318/lukecline/Dyno%20Sheets%20and%20Pics%204-30-05/?action=view¤t=dyno2.jpg
Best was actually 596/1200+ but the dyno op didnt put it on the sheet though. Cost.... uhh well alot.
#133
Originally Posted by glasseater
nice, now if only we could get that guy with over 800 on nitrous with a 7.3 in here... it's been proven time and time again that the 7.3 will beat the 6.0 in all-out performance, towing, mpg, reliability, BUT it will not beat in bang for your buck...
The guy camping next to me this weekend with a 7.3 said he wished he was getting the mielage his son gets with a 6.0. Its not the first time I have heard this statement while in an RV park. So then who do I believe? Who is right? Is FTE the only people to form an opinion from? See where I am going with this. He also commented about the torqshift and the towhaul feature. He could not believe how easy it was to tow with a 6.0/auto truck, compaired to his 7.3/auto. He is just one person, but several others have said the same thing here and out on the road.
Last edited by mrxlh; 09-04-2007 at 04:04 PM.
#134
Originally Posted by mrxlh
Well now, where has it been proven?
Just because 10,000 people quote what someone else has done, proves very little
Very few guys from the 7.3 world give a 6.0 the time of day. Who has even really (and I mean beyond a tuner and an exhaust) worked on a 6.0 platform other than Matt from Spartan? Tell me something else, cause I am really dying to know,
why is it when someone with a 6.0 has something on a 7.3 then the 7.3 guys start touting the 12v cummins? WTF is that all about?
#135