Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Warming up a PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #76  
slowolf's Avatar
slowolf
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central California Coast
Originally Posted by laredo7mma
This might give some better information to allow people to draw their own conclusion:
Maybe you can explain your graph for us novices. Also this appears to be oil pressures related to Cummins diesel. What does that have to do with Powerstroke?
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #77  
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Originally Posted by slowolf
Also this appears to be oil pressures related to Cummins diesel. What does that have to do with Powerstroke?
Dont get so hung up on this is a cummins, who cares? that is so much better data than the typical "IMHO" we always see on this site. At the end of the day, an engine is an engine, they all use oil pumps and have cranks, pistons, valves and valvetrains.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #78  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
That is an interesting graph, makes a good argument for using 5w-40 oil in the winter (which I do).

Got any idea at what engine rpm's this data was gathered? Could it be at idle speed?

Do you suppose at higher than idle speeds, pressure might come up sooner?
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #79  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by duffman77
Dont get so hung up on this is a cummins, who cares? that is so much better data than the typical "IMHO" we always see on this site. At the end of the day, an engine is an engine, they all use oil pumps and have cranks, pistons, valves and valvetrains.
What I have said here "IMHO" has been based on UOA of oil from my engine--which I consider to be a very good indicator of what is happening in my engine, and might even be an indicator of what may happen in other 7.3 powerstrokes.
Should a graph based on a cummins more believable than my own UOA? Your mileage may vary, but I know which one I'm hanging my hat on.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #80  
ryaneverk2's Avatar
ryaneverk2
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 3
Go easy, fellas.

About that graph, I'm assuming that the origin is just before you start the engine. It seems to show that the longer allowed to idle, the higher the oil pressure at the rocker shaft, for each oil, respectively. It also shows that each oil peaks out at about 45, 65, and 90 seconds, respectively. Lastly, it shows that 5W-40 synthetic builds pressure quicker than 10W-30 dino, which builds pressure quicker than 10W-40 dino.

So I think that the conclusion one could draw from that chart is that starting that particular cummins engine and letting it go for up to a minute and a half will be necessary to reach max pressure at the rocker shaft, and some oils will do it quicker than that.

While it's true that this is not one of our powerstrokes, I agree with duffman that it is similarly applicable to all engines, and probably the bigger the engine, the moreso or rather the longer it takes to build pressure, just because of the distance oil must travel.

That's what I gather from that particular graph, anyway.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:03 AM
  #81  
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Originally Posted by clux
What I have said here "IMHO" has been based on UOA of oil from my engine--which I consider to be a very good indicator of what is happening in my engine, and might even be an indicator of what may happen in other 7.3 powerstrokes.
Should a graph based on a cummins more believable than my own UOA? Your mileage may vary, but I know which one I'm hanging my hat on.
Why do you think that, that comment was directed at you? I was quoting someone else who asked in post 53 for proof, was given about the best proof you can get on this topic and complained it wasnt his motor specific.
The comment is very general to this site, alot of bad advice or alot of hearsay is given here and no proof or rational discussion to support it. Proof in point, I gave the same explanation as his graph in my post 23, because it was just words with no real back up, probably 80% of the readers though WTF is he talking about and ignored it.

Since you are calling me out on this, I will bounce it back to you, (I am not familiar with the engine the graph is based on but I am assuming it is probably out of a tractor trailer or similar HD app). If you think that your powerstroke gets oil up to the top end significantly faster than a HD engine, how do they typically go twice as many miles as our pickup diesels before rebuilds if there oil systems are so inferior?
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #82  
F250Wheels's Avatar
F250Wheels
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 652
Likes: 1
I think this graph shows A good point, and that is how cold is cold. My truck has never seen -15C, here in socal maybe +40F, if I was starting my truck at -15C I probaply wouldn't be so quick to start and go after 30 sec.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #83  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by duffman77
Since you are calling me out on this, I will bounce it back to you, (I am not familiar with the engine the graph is based on but I am assuming it is probably out of a tractor trailer or similar HD app). If you think that your powerstroke gets oil up to the top end significantly faster than a HD engine, how do they typically go twice as many miles as our pickup diesels before rebuilds if there oil systems are so inferior?
I'm not saying anything about the inferiority/superiority of any oiling systems, all I'm saying is that to my way of thinking, my own UOA is far better information to base decisions about my engine on than oil pressure data from an 11 litre I-6 cummins. That's all. My analysis reports tell me that what I am doing is is resulting in much less than average wear. Perhaps you can give me some sound reasons why I should believe this graph over what oil analysis is telling me?

As far as why OTR truck run a lot more miles than our pickups, I believe the answer there is opportunity. Could it be because the typical otr truck is running down the highway stacking on miles at the same time the typical pickup is sitting in a driveway at an idle while it warms up? How long would it take the typical pickup buyer to put a million miles on compared to an otr truck? I think our engines will run with any other engine in terms of total mileage if it is driven in the same manner.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #84  
slowolf's Avatar
slowolf
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central California Coast
Originally Posted by duffman77
I was quoting someone else who asked in post 53 for proof, was given about the best proof you can get on this topic and complained it wasnt his motor specific.
Easy Big Fella... I wasn't complaining. Just asking a rational question.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #85  
utahtom's Avatar
utahtom
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 2
From: Northern Utah
This thread sure seems to bounce around...
The question was about Warming up a PSD. I have started a cold 6.0 at 30 degrees F, short warm-up and drive for a total run-time of approx 20 minutes. I then immediately changed the oil and found that it was luke warm. It takes a lot longer to bring 14-15 quarts of oil up to operating temp compared to a typical 5-6 quart gasser.

FWIW I usually plug mine in when under 32 degrees (for a couple hours w/timer).
 

Last edited by utahtom; Oct 5, 2006 at 12:17 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #86  
NHRstein's Avatar
NHRstein
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Originally Posted by clux
I'm not saying anything about the inferiority/superiority of any oiling systems, all I'm saying is that to my way of thinking, my own UOA is far better information to base decisions about my engine on than oil pressure data from an 11 litre I-6 cummins. That's all. My analysis reports tell me that what I am doing is is resulting in much less than average wear. Perhaps you can give me some sound reasons why I should believe this graph over what oil analysis is telling me?

As far as why OTR truck run a lot more miles than our pickups, I believe the answer there is opportunity. Could it be because the typical otr truck is running down the highway stacking on miles at the same time the typical pickup is sitting in a driveway at an idle while it warms up? How long would it take the typical pickup buyer to put a million miles on compared to an otr truck? I think our engines will run with any other engine in terms of total mileage if it is driven in the same manner.


I think you are right about the manner in which a truck is driven, does dictate the miles you will get out of it. I am not sure if it's internet legend or not, but there was a story about a guy in the 80's driving a mercedes 250 miles each way to work every day. He got 1 million miles out of his vehicle at some point, when mercedes gave him a brand new s class and took his car back to place on show in a gallery somewhere. As for warm up time, I am lucky, I can idle down my streets at 5 mph for a little while before I apply any pressure to the accelerator, i let it warm for up to 2 minutes then roll for a bit. Climb a large hill, then enter the highway, I am usually at operating temp by the time i reach the highway. Stiff but smooth roll-on acceleration getting onto the highway and keep the speed up until the speed limiter kicks in, then let it slow down to about 80. Throw a game of cat and mouse in there and it's a trip to work. I don't think high idling hurts our engines, but standard idling does.
my .02
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 05:44 PM
  #87  
killaford's Avatar
killaford
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by clux
Perhaps you can give me some sound reasons why I should believe this graph over what oil analysis is telling me?


perhaps you would have even better results with a longer warm up idle period. we are talking about physics here and they seem to dictate the outcome of the posted graph.


UAO may not be the see all, be all of engine wear as i see it.


from what i have read at this site and others the 7.3 has below average wear anyway, plus the title of this thread is warming up the 6.uhoh.
 

Last edited by killaford; Oct 5, 2006 at 05:50 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 05:58 PM
  #88  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by killaford
perhaps you would have even better results with a longer warm up idle period. we are talking about physics here and they seem to dictate the outcome of the posted graph.


UAO may not be the see all, be all of engine wear as i see it.


from what i have read at this site and others the 7.3 has below average wear anyway, plus the title of this thread is warming up the 6.uhoh.
Um, I'm not sure where you've been posting, the title of the thread I've posted in was "Warming up a PSD".
Not that it really matters, except to maybe you.

I've also been told that I am destroying my engine because I don't pre-fill my oil filters at oil changes and because I run a 10,000 mile OCI. I can't figure out where wear metals might be going in my engine if they don't go into my crankcase oil. So, I think I'll stick with believing my UOA, thanks.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #89  
Anchorman's Avatar
Anchorman
New User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Just a thought on your UAO.

It's possible the results could be better with longer warm-ups and more frequent changes. The fact that you are happy with them is "good for you".
It doesn't mean that you have the ultimate engine strategy.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #90  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by Anchorman
Just a thought on your UAO.

It's possible the results could be better with longer warm-ups and more frequent changes. The fact that you are happy with them is "good for you".
It doesn't mean that you have the ultimate engine strategy.
That is possible. However, anytime my engine has been allowed to idle for long periods, my analysis typically come back with higher fuel percentages in the oil. With the start&go strategy, fuel percentage typically comes back aroun 1/2 a percent at 10,000.

I certainly don't believe I have the ultimate engine strategy, but I am happy with the results of what I am doing. I am simply claiming that start&go isn't resulting in any unusual wear. And I think my analysis backs that up.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE