V-6 years

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 28, 2001 | 08:58 AM

dpattonfl

Thread Starter

Senior User

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 114

Likes: 0

V-6 years

In the 80's, what years did Ford offer a V-6 in the F-150? I believe that dropped the I-6 for a few years before switching back to the I-6.

Jul 28, 2001 | 09:40 AM

460v10

Senior User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 111

Likes: 0

V-6 years

The 3.8 V6 was offered in the F100 and F150 2wd light duty lines in 1982-3 only. The 300 I-6 was still available during that time.

Jul 28, 2001 | 10:58 AM

82F100SWB

Post Fiend

Joined: Jan 2000

Posts: 5,330

Likes: 17

From: Dryden, ON, Canada

V-6 years

Ford apparently thought that the V6's good fuel mileage would be an attraction, but, it's miserable 112 hp and lackluster torque must have sold people on the 300 or 302. I've only seen 3.8's in F100 FlareSides with the small bolt pattern(GVW lower than 4750,) but, I've seen NP435's behind them.
You can also find the carburated 3.8 in 83 Mustang's, with 84 supposed to be CFI, but my 84 LX has a 2bbl....
Evan MacDonald
82 F100 FlareSide 2wd
HD 300-6 9.5:1 CR
Clifford 270H cam
Hedman Hedder
SBC valved 66 240 head
Headlight Relays - Delanty Style
NP435(6.69 low)
3.55 Geared ARB'd 9"
31x10.50/15 Cooper Discoverer LT's

Jul 28, 2001 | 12:16 PM

brown 4x4

Posting Guru

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 2,358

Likes: 3

From: Nebraska

V-6 years

[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 28-Jul-01 AT 01:17 PM (EST)[/font][p]Ford also offered a 255 V8 during I believe those same years. I personally have never seen either the 3.8 or 255 in a pickup, they must be pretty rare. Is this 3.8 V6 the same as the current 3.8 Ford uses (used?) in cars, etc?

Jul 28, 2001 | 12:35 PM

82F100SWB

Post Fiend

Joined: Jan 2000

Posts: 5,330

Likes: 17

From: Dryden, ON, Canada

V-6 years

The 255 is something along the lines of a small bore 302 with a, get this, hollow crank. The 3.8 is an older version of the current Mustang one(FWD's use a different bellhousing pattern) with different heads intake etc.
Evan MacDonald
82 F100 FlareSide 2wd
HD 300-6 9.5:1 CR
Clifford 270H cam
Hedman Hedder
SBC valved 66 240 head
Headlight Relays - Delanty Style
NP435(6.69 low)
3.55 Geared ARB'd 9"
31x10.50/15 Cooper Discoverer LT's

Jul 28, 2001 | 10:33 PM

otto

Posting Guru

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 1,686

Likes: 1

From: Racine WI

V-6 years

yup and the 3.8's are still damn lackluster and shortlived, damn sad they put the 3.8 in continentals there for awhile, fords 3.8 cant hold a candle to gm's 3.8 gen II

Jul 29, 2001 | 10:35 AM

82F100SWB

Post Fiend

Joined: Jan 2000

Posts: 5,330

Likes: 17

From: Dryden, ON, Canada

V-6 years

Yup, I'd much rather a Buick 231(turbo maybe?) than any Ford 3.8, the carbed Ford 3.8's actually are pretty reliable, but they have no power whatsoever, that's why the Mustang is getting a TT 351W :-)
Evan MacDonald
82 F100 FlareSide 2wd
HD 300-6 9.5:1 CR
Clifford 270H cam
Hedman Hedder
SBC valved 66 240 head
Headlight Relays - Delanty Style
NP435(6.69 low)
3.55 Geared ARB'd 9"
31x10.50/15 Cooper Discoverer LT's

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Verdad Gallardo

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Joe Kucinski

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Brett Foote

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Michael S. Palmer

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Joe Kucinski

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Brett Foote

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Joe Kucinski

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Joe Kucinski

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Michael S. Palmer

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Joe Kucinski

May 11, 2002 | 09:15 PM

thoseapples

Senior User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 235

Likes: 0

V-6 years

Hey now, those old three-eights were some good engines. I hear about lots of them going to 200K before failure, regardless of whether they were carbureted or EFI. And they take some abuse! My old '88 Cougar had the EFI version, in fact. It was at 177K beaten and half-way maintained miles when I sold it. Only quirk was a slight rod knock for two seconds at cold start-up. It idled properly and had good power. Never left me stranded, although some a**hole reached through the grille and unplugged the TFI module once while I was at work. But let me tell you, this engine took some insane punishment when I had it... 24K miles of neutral drops, high-revving chases, mud, water, overheating, lack of oil, one-wheel burnouts and I could go on. So the power output leaves some to be desired, but I personally would buy another one in a heartbeat.

May 22, 2002 | 10:02 PM

#10

brknfrd

New User

Joined: Feb 2002

Posts: 19

Likes: 0

V-6 years

Although I've never seen a f-100 or otherwise w/ a 3.8 or 255 I've had/have 2 Thunderbirds with them, one was a 89 LX with 140k miles which was purchased with 30k miles and beat repeatedly for many years (I would still own this car if it wasn't for the driver seat falling through the floor due to rust) the other is a 91 T-bird with a 3.8 which is still in excellent shape (23k miles) keep in mind these are 4k lb cars and the 3.8 moved them with decent efficiency. (I should mention the 91 bird is also a 5 spd and is Supercharged=very fun to push the go pedal)

brknfrd